Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 02/17/2026 12:16:13 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Global energy markets were put on alert after Iran temporarily restricted movement in parts of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the most strategically important oil transit routes on Earth.
The move came as Tehran simultaneously engaged in sensitive diplomatic talks with the United States over its nuclear program, underscoring how quickly geopolitical tensions in the Middle East can ripple through global markets.
While the disruption was limited and short lived, investors, energy traders, and policymakers immediately focused on what the action signals about regional stability, oil supply risks, and the broader geopolitical chess match between Iran and the West.
The Strait of Hormuz is not just another shipping lane. It is one of the most critical chokepoints in the global energy system, connecting oil producers in the Persian Gulf to major markets across Asia, Europe, and beyond.
Roughly 13 million barrels of crude oil per day moved through the strait in 2025, accounting for about 31 percent of global seaborne crude flows, according to shipping intelligence firm Kpler. Any disruption, even temporary, immediately raises concerns about supply stability and price volatility.
Iranian state media said parts of the strait were restricted due to “security precautions” tied to military drills conducted by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The exercise, described as “Smart Control of the Strait of Hormuz,” aimed to improve operational readiness and strengthen Iran’s deterrence posture.
This marked the first time Iran had partially shut sections of the waterway since tensions escalated earlier this year following warnings from President Donald Trump about potential military action related to Iran’s nuclear activities.
The temporary closure coincided with ongoing negotiations between U.S. and Iranian officials in Geneva, Switzerland. The talks are focused on resolving disputes surrounding Iran’s nuclear program and reducing the risk of broader regional conflict.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said both sides had reached an understanding of the “guiding principles” during the discussions, though he cautioned that significant work remains and a final agreement is not imminent.
The dual track of diplomacy and military signaling reflects a familiar pattern in Middle East geopolitics. While negotiations aim to deescalate tensions, both sides often maintain pressure through demonstrations of strength.
For markets, this creates a complex environment where headlines can shift sentiment rapidly, even without concrete changes in oil supply.
Energy traders closely monitored developments as news of the temporary restriction spread. Oil prices initially rose on concerns about potential disruptions but later retreated after it became clear the closure was limited in scope.
Brent crude fell 1.8 percent to around $67.48 per barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate slipped 0.4 percent to roughly $62.65. The pullback reflected market confidence that global supply would not face immediate interruption.
Shipping industry officials also downplayed the severity of the situation. Jakob Larsen, chief safety and security officer at Bimco, said the impact would likely be modest.
“The exercise establishes a live firing exercise area overlapping the inbound part of Strait of Hormuz’s Traffic Separation Scheme, and requests that shipping keeps clear of the area for the duration of a few hours,” Larsen said.
“Given the level of tension in the area, it is expected that commercial shipping will comply with the Iranian request to keep clear of the exercise area.”
In practical terms, this means minor delays rather than large scale disruption. Still, markets remain sensitive because even small interruptions in such a critical corridor can escalate quickly if tensions worsen.
Even temporary restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz matter because of what they represent. The region remains one of the most geopolitically fragile and economically vital parts of the world. Any sign of instability can affect multiple asset classes simultaneously.
The Middle East remains a central focus for global energy security. Iran sits at the crossroads of several major geopolitical dynamics including nuclear negotiations, regional military rivalries, and global oil supply balance.
The U.S. maintains a significant military presence in the region, and any escalation involving Iran carries the risk of broader confrontation. At the same time, global demand for energy remains high, making stability in the Persian Gulf essential for the world economy.
Iran has historically used the Strait of Hormuz as a strategic lever. Even limited restrictions serve as a reminder of the country’s ability to influence global oil flows without firing a single shot.
For markets, the key question is whether this incident represents a temporary tactical move or an early signal of rising geopolitical tension.
Several factors will determine how markets react in the coming weeks:
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Methinks Iran might suffer more than we would.
This was a live fire exercise by the mullahs. I bet the US got lots of intel from this.
i.e. this is a non-story.
“I let Prime Minister Netanyahiu know that negotiation is my preference,” Trump said.
Still, “bomb-happy Bibi” reportedly brought (cough) “intel” to the Trump meeting intended to convince Trump to target Iran’s ballistic missile stockpiles (Israeli news outlet i24News propaganda reported).
Reality Check
Iran has a large military in terms of personnel, tanks, and regional
proxies, plus Iran has larger numbers in its missile arsenal.
Yet, Israel is generally seen as militarily stronger due to its annoyingly persistent lobby embedding
Israel’s “qualitative edge” in US law without the knowledge and acquiescence of US taxpayers.
Israel slobbers at the US funding trough 24/7 and is dependent on US tax dollars to advance its air power, the paper tiger of its super-hyped intelligence apparat, and its presumably “cutting-edge” technology financed with US tax dollars.
Israeli military is totally dependent on US tax dollars and thus can throw around its military weight against anyone who stands in the way of Israel’s quest for world domination.
Israel makes a sophomoric show-and-tell of “strong US support”.
US taxpayer outlays for its multi-layered air defense system are massive.......
thus making Israel appear to be superior in technological and military effectiveness.
Patriots, Call Congress
US Capitol switchboard
(202) 224-3121
Contact the Trump DOJ
Phone 800-514-0301
TDD 800-514-0383.
Call the Trump White House
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
TTY/TTD Comments: 202-456-6213
Send a letter to the White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500
Message: US Taxpayers want it known: we do not exist to be preyed upon, and are not constitutionally obligated to finance the propaganda of “reliable allies”—— with their greedy pols lusting after billions of our tax dollars.
Threaten Iran by shutting down another California refinery.
Good, China suffers from that move.
Take out Kharg island, their refineries and pipelines,and Iran collapses. You can’t fight a war without fuel.
ZIM and PBR-A bump
Volatility is profit
Now hold on a minute, we were told just few months ago Iran’s nuclear facilities were totally destroyed. Supposedly many years before it could ever rebound.
So, what the h3!! is all this negotiation of a nuclear program about. That has been decided.....
Pepperidge Farms remembers.
And another thing:
2 weeks ago or so the entire Iran regime was on brink of collapsing. Why would we now give them legitimacy by negotiating with them?
How did the Germans lose the historic Battle of the Bulge
despite having 500,000 men and the advantage of surprise?
The Germans launched the Ardennes offensive with 450,000 men and another 70,000 in reserve, along with 150 King tigers, artillery, light armor etc etc...... Americans there were not only poorly supplied, and massively outnumbered, but they were also quite green and hadn’t seen much action.
A German offensive of this size had not been seen since Kursk the year prior and the Germans inflicted nearly a million casualties on the Soviets.
How did the Germans not just steamroll them and go right into Antwerp before letting Patton arrive with reinforcements? How did 20,000 poorly supplied Americans hold out long enough for the the third army to break through?
The Germans ran out of fuel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.