Skip to comments.
Canada’s Mark Carney Can’t Even Challenge American Hegemony Without American Help
The Federalist ^
| 02/10/2026
| Chris Bray
Posted on 02/10/2026 9:55:15 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Sometimes a punchline arrives a few weeks after the joke.
A little less than three weeks ago, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney made the globalist media swoon by standing on a stage in Davos and declaring the sudden new limits of American power. For years, Carney said, American hegemony was a stabilizing force in the world, so other countries tolerated America’s many failures to live up to its declared ideals — in Carney’s words, “the gaps between rhetoric and reality.”
But no more. In the age of a certain bad orange man, America has lost the trust of its erstwhile allies. “This bargain no longer works,” Carney announced. “Let me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.” The time to end Canada’s reliance on American power has arrived, as an urgent strategic challenge that can’t be avoided. The world order has ruptured, and America’s out.
Pivoting away from America, Carney declared the coming emergence of a new security alliance, a coalition of “middle powers,” that would challenge an arrogant hegemon. Canada, the prime minister warned, had decided to “fundamentally shift our strategic posture,” aggressively changing policy “to build our strength at home.”
Idiots celebrated. Professional dullard David French declared in the pages of The New York Times that Carney had “marked out a path of allied integration and cooperation that could create, in essence, a new great power rival to the United States.” American power in the world used to matter, until it was killed in a single year by Donald Trump being boorish, after which Canada came up with a replacement.
So a notice published in the Federal Register on February 9 is at least a little funny. A formal Arms Sale Notification prepared by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency announces the proposed transfer of $2.68 billion in American weapons and other military equipment to Canada, that bold new rival to American power. Along with thousands of bombs and JDAM guidance sets, the proposed deal with Canada would provide “classified and unclassified software and software support; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; United States (U.S.) Government and contractor technical, engineering, and logistics personnel services; and other related elements of logistics and program support.”
Canada’s brave new challenge to American military power requires American tech support. American military contractors will send bombs and guidance systems, with engineering and logistical assistance, to the leading nation in Mark Carney’s new anti-American coalition of middle powers. Not that it matters: “The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the basic military balance in the region,” the announcement declares. Someone tell David French. Gently, I mean.
A similar announcement from a week earlier describes the proposed sale of another $1.75 billion in American weapons to Canada, starting with “Twenty-six (26) M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS).”
Both proposed deals were being negotiated well before Carney arrived in Davos, which means that the Canadian prime minister gave a tub-thumping speech about building strength to challenge arrogant American power while knowing that he needed to use American weapons and ongoing technical support to do it.
Chris Bray is a former infantry sergeant in the U.S. Army, and has a history PhD from the University of California Los Angeles, not that it did him any good. He also posts on Substack, at "Tell Me How This Ends," here.
TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: australia; canada; davos; hegemony; lol; markcarney; ukappendage; unitedkingdom
To: SeekAndFind
Someone tell David French. Gently, I mean. Only if I can do while gently playing his head like a bongo.
While walking down the stairs.
2
posted on
02/10/2026 10:07:29 AM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(The tree accused of killed Sonny Bono was planted.)
To: SeekAndFind
He’s all touque and no poutine.
3
posted on
02/10/2026 10:13:39 AM PST
by
xp38
To: SeekAndFind
Worst thing a Yank can say to an Anglophone Canadian:
Hey! You guys are just like us! And if they launch into an anti-American rant, just point out it's an American style anti-American rant.
Such as can be heard on any college campus in the USA. { snicker }
4
posted on
02/10/2026 10:33:14 AM PST
by
Salman
(Trump is good, but we need Pinochet. )
To: SeekAndFind
Canada has no choice, they don’t have the size, tech base, etc to “go it alone” and be “sovereign” in national defense.
These weapon systems today are extremely complex and extraordinarily expensive. They require specialized hardware that not everyone has.
Is Canada going to put in their own global satellite communication system in space? What about GPS?
Sadly, this sort of stupidity is what people think is cool today: https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/why-experts-say-canadas-plan-to-ditch-the-f-35-is-a-strategic-disaster/
Canada will possibly settle for a vastly inferior platform, still be dependent on the US, but also face compatibility issues and possible logistical strain as they go with a Grippen.
Of course the consequences of this stupidity are felt years to come, long after the jerks making these decisions today and pretending to be some sort of Canadian John Wayne are out of office.
These “idiot moves” are so politicians can grand stand and exploit populist sentiments, at the expense to their nations security and even military personnels’ lives.
It’s the sort of thing you expect a Bad Bunny (what a retarded name) to do at the Superbowl, but not a PM leading a nation, making decisions affecting the entire country, and where lives could be at stake in the future.
5
posted on
02/10/2026 11:20:10 AM PST
by
Red6
To: SeekAndFind
I almost bought some Canadian cheese the other day, then I remembered who their Prime Minister is, and I put it back on the shelf. It was bad enough that I had to buy Wisconsin cheese, but at least Wisconsin dairy farmers aren’t from Canuckistan.
6
posted on
02/10/2026 11:27:45 AM PST
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." The Weapons Shops of Isher)
To: Red6
Canada politicians do Indigenous Land Acknowledgements everywhere they go.
If they don’t think they own their own land why should we or any other nation think so.
They are ripe for the picking.
7
posted on
02/10/2026 11:37:29 AM PST
by
cgbg
("Your identity is how power treats you.")
To: All
Problem is, this sort of rant sounds like this outside of Amagica ...
TRUMP .. We wish you middle powers in NATO would stand on your own two feet and we’re certainly not trading with you.
CARNEY .. The middle powers will henceforth have to band together and stand on our own two feet, and find new places to trade.
TRUMP PROPAGANDA FRIEND .. See they hate America now they’re trading with China, I would say more but Walmart have a big sale on the latest batch of imported Chinese goods.
And we’re supposed to say we’re sorry, eh? Well that’s only on South Park now. Good luck in the hockey by the way.
8
posted on
02/10/2026 11:46:15 AM PST
by
Peter ODonnell
(Vision quest this month, results are happening faster than expected, I will report on it soon)
To: SeekAndFind
The 51st state is the best Canada can do.
9
posted on
02/10/2026 11:55:42 AM PST
by
NavyShoe
To: NavyShoe
We might be able to get two or three Red States out of congenial Canadian provinces. We should make the provinces that don’t make the cut into American territorial protectorates.
To: sauropod
11
posted on
02/10/2026 2:06:11 PM PST
by
sauropod
To: Peter ODonnell
Nice try canuck. Trump's argument is Canada (and the rest of NATO) needs to adhere to their agreements and meet their GDP spending goals on defense. If you don't, there will be penalties. US defense is a safety net, not a hammock. Why should we bear the burden while Canada continues to coast and make excuses?
Canada has only met NATO spending goals TWICE since 1989. Only twice in 37 years. Some friends.
Canada: How dare our friends expect us to adhere to commitments we made? How dare our friends that we have tariffed for years enact tariffs against us? We don't understand why our security partners don't want us to undermine our collective defense and security arrangements by partnering with our biggest adversary......
Never forget - America fought for its independence. Mum basically had to encourage and kick Canada out of the house like a lazy 30 year old still living in the basement.
To: Repeat Offender
Canada has been an independent country since 1867. Just because you have an arbitrary set of rules for independence doesn’t mean people in other countries have to follow those rules. We are quite happy to be a member of the British Commonwealth under a form of government known as constitutional monarchy. You wouldn’t be, but so what?
13
posted on
02/10/2026 6:17:40 PM PST
by
Peter ODonnell
(Vision quest this month, results are happening faster than expected, I will report on it soon)
To: Red6
Go over to You Tube and see the videos posted about what terrible shape Canada is in.
It’s pretty incredible.
14
posted on
02/10/2026 10:55:15 PM PST
by
jmacusa
( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
To: Peter ODonnell
Constitutional monarchy’’?! What? There’s no such thing and just who the hell are you?
15
posted on
02/10/2026 10:59:23 PM PST
by
jmacusa
( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
To: All
I won’t be able to reason with a person who says “there is no such thing as a constitutional monarchy.” What the poster really means is probably that he doesn’t like the idea of a constitutional monarchy. Fine by me, I am not surprised given this is an American discussion site. But you can’t define reality by your likes or dislikes, otherwise for me, basketball would not exist.
If anyone smarter shows up and wants to discuss issues I raised in an intelligent manner, I would be happy to do so.
It may be a while until I bother to check in though. I am sort of between a rock and a hard place not liking either conventional globalist politics, nor the brand of jingoism being practised by Donald Trump. I would love to see something different from both of those but nobody strong enough to withstand the Insult Storm emerged in 2016 and so we’re stuck with this brand. I’m sure it won’t end well.
16
posted on
02/10/2026 11:22:46 PM PST
by
Peter ODonnell
(I'm sure it won't end well. Don't be too surprised when it doesn't.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson