Posted on 01/21/2026 9:31:33 AM PST by Heartlander
Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has attempted to hold Pax Americana together with a simple, deeply flawed strategy: pay everyone off and hope they behave. Allies, adversaries, neutrals—it didn’t matter. Subsidies, aid, trade asymmetries, security guarantees, sanctions waivers, and diplomatic indulgences were handed out on the assumption that gratitude would follow. It didn’t—entitlement did.
Bribery diplomacy rests on a childlike premise: if you keep paying, people will stay in line. In reality, when money flows freely and consequences never arrive, it stops being leverage and becomes reverse tribute. Nations don’t become loyal. They become resentful, arrogant, and defiant. And the moment you threaten to turn off the spigot, the outrage begins. “How dare you?” “You’re betraying us.” “You’re imperialist.” “You’re fascist.” The language is predictable because the psychology is.
Europe is the archetype. After World War II, the United States rebuilt the continent and underwrote its security. That made sense at the time. What didn’t make sense was continuing to subsidize Europe indefinitely while tolerating trade imbalances, defense freeloading, and open hostility toward American interests. When Trump demanded NATO countries pay their share, it was treated as the end of the “world order.” When he demanded reciprocal trade instead of one-way free trade, elites panicked. The system wasn’t collapsing; the subsidy was.
What changed wasn’t American behavior; it was American clarity. The current administration made explicit what had long been implicit: access to American markets, protection, and capital requires alignment. Some countries understood this immediately. Middle Eastern, Eastern European, and East Asian nations recalibrated. Traditional allies, by contrast, were offended. They mistook indulgence for permanence and reacted by publicly rebuking “America First” while privately relying on it.
Iran is the most damning case study. Under George W. Bush, billions flowed into Iraq and were then directly funneled to Tehran without consequence. Under Obama, the United States openly paid the regime and wrapped capitulation in the language of diplomacy via the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and rebuked the election of the democratically elected ally Allawi in favor of Iranian stooge Maliki (so much for promoting democracy). Iran expanded its terror network accordingly. Under Trump, the architect of Iran’s global terror strategy, Soleimani, was killed, and Iran did nothing of consequence because they couldn’t. Later, U.S. backing enabled Israel and Saudi Arabia to dismantle Iranian proxies, from Hamas to the Houthis, and take the fight directly to Tehran. Once confronted with real force, the “regional power” revealed itself as brittle.
Venezuela followed the same pattern. For decades, administrations denounced Chávez and Maduro while allowing them to align with China, Russia, and Iran, turning a once-rich country into a failed, hostile state in America’s backyard. Diplomacy dragged on without building real regional allies or applying real pressure, only talk and worthless denunciations. Trump ended the illusion in under two hours by capturing, arresting, and indicting Maduro on narco-terror charges. No ground invasion. Just consequences, and Russian and Chinese defense measures left exposed as totally inadequate against the U.S.’s ability to enact justice.
The result is uncomfortable for those who prefer fairy tales. The United States doesn’t need to be the “nice guy” to be effective. Paying the junkie with more crack doesn’t cure the addiction. It deepens it. Power unexercised becomes doubted. Power exercised becomes deterrence.
The Washington establishment will insist that this approach is reckless, unsustainable, and destabilizing. They said the same about confronting the USSR, withdrawing from the Iran deal, and moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem. They were wrong then. They’re wrong now. The real risk isn’t that America acts; it’s that America stops paying people who dislike us. Bribery never buys loyalty. It buys temporary compliance but long-term resentment. Trump didn’t end diplomacy. He ended the lie that money without consequence counts as diplomacy at all.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Bribery “Diplomacy” Is Over
___________________________
And economic sanctions and tariffs have effectively taken its place.
Thanks DJT.
Once you pay the Danegeld you never get rid of the Dane.
L
“Power unexercised becomes doubted.
Power exercised becomes deterrence.”
Well-crafted.
I don’t think it is over yet.
It still works with the states. The DoEd, DOT, FAA, and all sorts of other agencies rest on pretty much the same principle of bribery diplomacy.
If the states do not do what the feds want then certain money will be withheld.
This is not going anywhere, any time soon. It may only be on temporary hold while Trump’s presidency is in effect. But that’s only 3 years remaining.
But if you pay Denmark 700B and own Greenland in exchange, it’s win-win. And no one can call that imperialistic.
And actually, all of welfare rests on the exact same principle of bribery diplomacy.
The government has gained for itself exorbitant powers over (for example) farmers through the farm subsidy. You won’t do what big daddy boss government wants you to do?
Guess what’s going to happen to your subsidy pal. Yeah that’s right, bow down and kiss the ring and take your dirty money.
To my knowledge farmers can’t even plant new crops from their own seed, they’re forced to buy more. Regulation coupled with bribery is a powerful force indeed. And here you want this SNAP EBT debit card? Thank you for voting for democrats.
This is not going anywhere for a very long time. I’ll believe it when I start seeing Congress abolish whole agencies and a president demanding wide-scale abolitions.
Trump even promised to abolish the Department of Education. You seen any administration people ask Congress for an abolish bill? Nope, me neither.
It’s not going anywhere. The status quo comes back in 3 years.
Yep.
True.
“To my knowledge farmers can’t even plant new crops from their own seed, they’re forced to buy more.”
That is not the government forcing farmers to buy seed every year. That is private industry creating hybrid crops that they own the patents for. They contractually prevent farmers from harvesting seeds and replanting them.
Tariffs are more effective anyway. And lucrative!
Appeasement never works. My tagline.
It’s been blackmail, not bribery, for decades.
That is also true.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.