Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 01/20/2026 9:29:33 AM PST by Whatever Works
Good information on voter identification.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
“Well, I learned something.” — LOLOL...me, too. What did we learn today?
A lot more numbers supporting what I already knew. But I’m old, so they are gone again.
Here is the link, although you could click on The Liberty Daily in the post and it would take you there.
Illegals voting...
Both illegals and non-citizens with a valid visa should not be voting. To label voting an illegal immigrant issue destroys credibility.
Motor Voter is the cause. When a non-citizen applies for a drivers license he is automatically registered to vote. The software design makes is difficult for a non-citizen to go out of his way and state that voter registration is not wanted.
In my experience, registered non-citizens do not vote. VOTE HARVESTERS vote on behalf of non-citizens, just as they do the dead, movers, vacant houses, vacant lots that are registered.
They are not immigrants.
Immigrants enter the country LEGALLY
Take an oath to uphold AMERICAN values.
Are required to learn ENGLISH
and are required to follow AMERICAN LAWS.
The people being deported are ILLEGAL INVADERS
Who hate America,
Refuse to learn English,
Ignore American laws,
And steal from American citizens AND immigrants.
The left has an interesting dichotomy.
They have to defend the ability for illegals to get drivers licenses. “They need to have IDs!”
While at the SAME TIME speaking AGAINST voter ID under the guises of “Black people can’t get IDs, so this is an attempt to stop blacks from voting”.
She Finally Learned Republicans Were Trump47 Was Right About Illegal Alien Voters
There! Fixed it.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Regarding illegal alien voters, the patriot in the video probably doesn't understand that patriot Republicans who would make sure that Section 2 of the 14th Amendment (14A) is being enforced, that section a penalty for states where ballot box fraud has occurred, became extinct generations ago imo.
In fact, note the zero tolerance "hair trigger" wording in that section which should be a warning for any state thinking about rigging an election, triggers that Pence and the J6 Congress wrongly ignored (imo) when they voted to accept Biden's electoral votes in 2020 despite allegations of vote-counting problems.
is denied to any
or in any way abridged,
Section 2 of 14A: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election [all emphases added] for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. [Apportionment of Representatives]
Section 5 of 14A: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
The problem with Section 2 is that it has historically been ignored for the most part, evidence of the uniparty imo.
In fact, here is third-party opinion that Section 2 of 14A is wrongly being ignored, evidence of the uniparty protecting its ongoing abuse of the repealable (hint)16th Amendment (direct taxes) imo.
No serious effort was ever made in Congress to effectuate § 2, and the only judicial attempt was rebuffed.2 , cert. denied, 328 U.S. 870 (1946). —Apportionment Clause
The Section had long been dead. But there are two camps of legal scholars who wish to revive it. The first consists of those who would like to see Section Two enforced to punish states that abridge their citizens’ right to vote, especially in the wake of Shelby County v. Holder. Recently, Joshua Geltzer, the executive director at Georgetown’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection and the former senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council, added himself to this camp. The second camp is using Section Two, which distinguishes on the basis of gender, as evidence that Section One’s Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit gender-based discrimination. Jonathan Mitchell spearheads this movement. —The Worrisome Ghost of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Second Section
Regarding the wrongly ignored Section 2, Thomas Jefferson had warned against cherry-picking some parts of the Constitution at the expense of ignoring other parts (my words).
The general rule [is] that an instrument is to be so construed as to reconcile and give meaning and effect to all its parts. --Thomas Jefferson to -----, 1816. ME 14:445
Democrats are EVILLY CLEVER!! We are SLOW WITTED AND SLOW FOOTED!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.