Posted on 01/11/2026 9:28:49 PM PST by ProgressingAmerica
WASHINGTON — Sen. Chris Murphy said in an interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that if the U.S. annexed Greenland, “it would be the end of NATO.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
What does NATO bring to the table anyway? The NATO countries are more communist than Russia.
Good.
Weve outgrown NATO so let the Euroweeniwashers make empty threats against POtUS while they should be deporting Muzzlimz that are wrecking their civilization.
You don’t need to sell us.
We’re sold.
We’re sold.
Two birds, one stone.
That’s acceptable.
Win-win.
He says that like it is a bad thing.
He says that like it is a bad thing.
Murphy should resign from the Senate in protest . . .
“End of NATO”
Good
I’m sure the end of our democracy also. /s
Hey Chris, we are NATO you idiot.
What would be bad about igniting a race to get nuclear bombs among former NATO allies, including Turkey, igniting nuclear proliferation among other countries in the Mideast and around the world as a knock-on effect?
What would be bad about denuding 350 million people of the cohesion and unity that exists because of the withdrawal of America's nuclear umbrella and America's intelligence gathering power, thus causing nation after nation to go their own way for security and economic survival, inevitably causing many of them to partner with Russia and China?
What would be bad about antagonizing 350 million of our trading partners?
What would be bad about our finding Europe now opposes our initiatives in Latin America and in Asia because they can profit individually by doing so?
What would be bad about converting the Atlantic nations' common modus vivendi of a rules-based world into a Hobbesian world?
Invading Greenland seems like a really bad idea.
Oh well!
So it’s a win win win situation all the way around! What are we waiting for?
“Your terms are acceptable.”
Can Murphy have a fatal accident tomorrow morning?
That’s what he wants for Republicans!
We accept your terms.
And that’s a bad thing?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.