Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Double Tap Strikes and Maritime Law [my title]
X ^ | Dec 8, 2025 | John Ʌ Konrad V

Posted on 12/08/2025 10:16:32 AM PST by FreedomPoster

Everyone knows that so called “double tap” strikes on land are legal, Obama did it all the time, but CNN keeps inviting land lawyers on to say narco terrorists have special privileges at sea.

Let’s look at the admiralty law: 🧵

Source: International law studies

@NavalWarCollege

“Rudderless and Adrift: States’ Unwarranted Timidity Respecting Stateless Vessels

Andrew Norris”

Ships without a recognized flag, “stateless vessels”, are the outlaws of the ocean. They don’t have a clear nationality, so no country claims responsibility for them.

International law already allows governments to stop, board, and enforce laws against these vessels.

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War
KEYWORDS: colorrevolution; deepstate

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
This is an excerpt of a long X thread by a recognized maritime expert. Worth a read, especially if you are following the deep state color revolution op against Hegseth.

Will require an X account, which you should probably have, even if you don't post there.

1 posted on 12/08/2025 10:16:32 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Here’s the whole thread in another easier to read format.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1997996613076189249.html


2 posted on 12/08/2025 10:18:22 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Good stuff.


3 posted on 12/08/2025 10:30:38 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Democrats seek power through cheating and assassination. They are sociopaths. They just want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

As usual, The Gaslight Media is spewing lies.

Never did that to Droolin’ Joe Biden, though.


4 posted on 12/08/2025 10:32:33 AM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Hey, it’s a historic tradition of the sea. Japanese Zeroes strafe men in lifeboats. At Midway the Captain of a Destroyer threw the weighted-down crew of an SBD into the water after interrogating them.
The Nazi U-boat U-852 machine ginned survivors in the water.

Not the look America has traditionally had, but hey, times are different.


5 posted on 12/08/2025 10:48:13 AM PST by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

We shot our share of Jap sailors in WWII.


6 posted on 12/08/2025 10:50:04 AM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

This is an organized effort to go after Hegseth. It has been going on since the minute he was sworn in...even before if you remember the skank who met him in the bar and went to his room to get plowed, then concocted a rape story for her husband.

This thing in Venezuela is about oil and geopolitics, not dope. Glad these boats are being interdicted, but this is a stupid self inflicted wound. We have more than enough combat power to stop these boats and capture the loads if it was about dope.

This is a distraction.


7 posted on 12/08/2025 10:53:55 AM PST by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Here’s the whole thread safely archived offshore where neither X nor the Feds can flush it down the Memory Hole:

archive.ph/Hk0fb


8 posted on 12/08/2025 10:56:03 AM PST by HKMk23 (https://youtu.be/LTseTg48568)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yeah, as someone else pointed out General Kinney did so at Bismarck Sea. But he said that was in direct retaliation for Japs shooting at American pilots in parachutes and further because the survivors were 15-25 miles from Lae where they would rejoin the battle.

But in general, shooting guys floating on the wreckage is not what American forces do.


9 posted on 12/08/2025 10:58:09 AM PST by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

War is Hell, don’t start them.


10 posted on 12/08/2025 10:58:49 AM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Not to mention marooned Jap sailors or downed pilots would regularly attack the sailors of a US sub trying to rescue them.

They made the choice -for- our men.


11 posted on 12/08/2025 11:00:30 AM PST by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino; Jane Long
I think you miss the profound and enormous difference between uniformed military in a declared war and an illegal combatant / pirate / drug runner. Oh, and FWLIW, the grandfather of a close friend was on MacArthur's staff at Corregidor, survived 3+ years in a Japanese POW camp, and gave significant testimony in war crimes trials that led to a number of his captors being hanged by the neck until dead. Because those differences matter. You should consider them carefully. Which is what this post is about.

But here, just to help you with some historic US precedence, here is a nice picture of President Thomas Jefferson's Navy and Marines giving full due process to Islamic pirate slavers. Show it to Rand Paul if you get a chance.


12 posted on 12/08/2025 11:19:02 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Give us the operational details on how you propose to stop those boats.


13 posted on 12/08/2025 11:20:10 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Long standing tradition.
During WWII:
if a german pilot bails out over england, he is protected since it is assumed he will be captured and cannot return to the war.
if a Geman pilot bails out over German occupied territory he is not protected and can be fired upon since it is assumed he will return to combat.


14 posted on 12/08/2025 11:30:04 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things thePy agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

The British government ended slavery with a simple plan of action: If a slave ship was discovered on the high seas, it was boarded and the crew were hanged.

That ended slavery transport on the high seas.


15 posted on 12/08/2025 11:30:41 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Two to the chest, head gets the rest.......


16 posted on 12/08/2025 11:41:31 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱🙏! Winning currently!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

The Geneva Conventions now in effect I believe date from 1949.

What was legal in WW2 may no longer be.


17 posted on 12/08/2025 11:43:25 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

18 posted on 12/08/2025 11:46:13 AM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

I don’t believe the discussion in the OP I linked references the Geneva Conventions.


19 posted on 12/08/2025 11:51:18 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

“(ii) Anyone who is defenceless because of unconsciousness, shipwreck, wounds or sickness. This category is based on the Hague Regulations, common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I, which prohibit attacks on defenceless persons”

“immunity from attack is conditional on refraining from any hostile act or attempt to escape”

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule47


20 posted on 12/08/2025 11:53:31 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson