Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas judges can now refuse to perform same-sex marriages
Fox 4 ^

Posted on 10/29/2025 2:12:54 PM PDT by TigerClaws

AUSTIN - Judges in Texas are now able to refuse to perform marriages for religious reasons, the state's highest court decided Friday.

While the Texas Supreme Court's addition to the judicial conduct code does not include reasoning for the change, it follows a years-long debate over whether judges within the state are obligated to perform same-sex ceremonies. Texas Supreme Court ruling

What we know:

The ruling, amending Canon 4 of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, was signed Friday, Oct. 24. Click to open this PDF in a new window.

The comment reads as follows:

"It is not a violation of these canons for a judge to publicly refrain from performing a wedding ceremony based upon a sincerely held religious belief."

The ruling is effective immediately.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2ndpeter2vvs6thru9; genesischapter19; godlessreprobates; homosexualagenda; homosexualpolicy; intercession; judges; lgbt; lgbtq; marriage; romans1; sodomandgomorrah; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
ROE is no longer the law of the land.

Is "gay marriage" the next to fall?

1 posted on 10/29/2025 2:12:54 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Why does it have to be a religious objection?

Why not just objection?


2 posted on 10/29/2025 2:14:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I donโ€™t see why this isnโ€™t nation-wide. Religious expression should include refusing to do the devilโ€™s work.


3 posted on 10/29/2025 2:15:58 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
["It is not a violation of these canons for a judge to publicly refrain from performing a wedding ceremony based upon a sincerely held religious belief."]

Son of Satan DEMOCRAT Barack Hussein Obama will probably make a Godless Reprobate comment on this...goes against his agenda for Destroying Normal Society...


[Obergefell v. Hodges -
DECIDED ON FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2015]


Look at Barack Hussein Obama as a Muslim Foreign Agent seeking to destroy America from within and then everything he did, didn't do, dragged his feet on, ALL makes complete sense




All According to SATAN'S Plan

DEMOCRAT Barack Hussein Obama's Rainbow White House HAPPENED ON FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 2015 - turning the White House into a Godless Reprobate Abomination



DO NO HARM, Christians, but REJECT this
Godless Reprobate Agenda. WALK AWAY.

(For the thread)


4 posted on 10/29/2025 2:18:20 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution. Always seemed like a 10th Amendment situation to me. If MA wants to legalize it, that's their choice. Other states don't need to go along. But NO! Supreme Court said every state had to join the party!

Meanwhile, the right to keep and bear arms IS mentioned in the Constitution, and it shall not be infringed. But, of course, each state and municipality has their own view of this, and the right gets infringed in a million ways, and everyone just has to deal with it.

5 posted on 10/29/2025 2:19:42 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Democrats seek power through cheating and assassination. They are sociopaths. They just want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
It'll take the fag lobby 10 minutes to find a Biden/Obama/Clinton appointed Federal judge to overrule this.
6 posted on 10/29/2025 2:19:47 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Import The Third World,Become The Third World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I don’t think that “religious conviction” is the best way to frame this.


7 posted on 10/29/2025 2:26:12 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (The Democrats' official policy is now, โ€œHate, Violence and Murder". Change my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Good!


8 posted on 10/29/2025 2:30:16 PM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page to help me go home again. https://www.givesendgo.com/GCRRD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
[the fag lobby]

But DEMOCRAT Barack Hussein Obama sez he knows
what's best for the children! C'mon man!!!




[All pictures are posted for Educational Purposes
in accordance with Fair Use]


DO NO HARM, Americans
BUT Be SITUATIONALLY-AWARE

(For the thread)

Demand that Democrats STOP
๐Ÿ›‘๐Ÿšฆ๐Ÿ›‘๐Ÿšฆ๐Ÿ›‘ GROOMING Children
for the LGBTQ+ HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA

9 posted on 10/29/2025 2:32:01 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Just bake the goddam cake.


10 posted on 10/29/2025 2:32:22 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

๐Ÿ˜†


11 posted on 10/29/2025 2:33:44 PM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page to help me go home again. https://www.givesendgo.com/GCRRD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Excellent!


12 posted on 10/29/2025 2:37:19 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands (If someone says that there are no absolutes, ask them if they are absolutely sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative; SaveFerris

>> It’ll take the fag lobby 10 minutes to find a Biden/Obama/Clinton appointed Federal judge to overrule this.

Yep! And it’ll end up in the Supreme Court, which IMO may just be ready to repeal Obergefell, which was HUGE judicial overreach, just as was Roe v. Wade. (Remember Roberts voted against Obergefell last time it came up there...)

So sodomites and lezbos, go ahead and sue! Make my day!


13 posted on 10/29/2025 2:40:30 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Hope, as a righteous product of properly aligned Faith, IS in fact a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

If MA wants to legalize it, that’s their choice. Other states don’t need to go along. But NO! Supreme Court said every state had to join the party!


Yes, SCOTUS did, but it is the Constitution that says that every state has to recognize the official actions of other stated. If you get married in MA, you are legally married in the other 49 states.

Lot’s of movies from the 40s referred to a wife moving to Reno to get a divorce because Nevada divorce laws were much more lenient than other states, especially NY where it was virtually impossible to get a divorce. Divorced in NV, you were divorced in NY.


14 posted on 10/29/2025 3:04:19 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

The problem is the Respect for Marriage Act mandates same-sex “marriage” recognition in all 50 states, passed as a Lame Duck session in 2022 so Democrats can impose their will for all.


15 posted on 10/29/2025 3:05:11 PM PDT by WhiteHatBobby0701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WhiteHatBobby0701
The problem is the Respect for Marriage Act mandates same-sex โ€œmarriageโ€ recognition in all 50 states, passed as a Lame Duck session in 2022 so Democrats can impose their will for all.

How, under the 10th amendment, can the Federal Government make such a law?

16 posted on 10/29/2025 3:14:22 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesnโ€™t become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

This is a big win. One should not be forced to condone or enable behavior that is objectionable to one’s conscience.


17 posted on 10/29/2025 3:24:25 PM PDT by JayGalt (For America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu
Yes, SCOTUS did, but it is the Constitution that says that every state has to recognize the official actions of other stated.

My big issue is that if you have a firearms permit in AZ, and drive to another state (ex. MA) you can be in big trouble because the states in-between may or may not recognize the official actions of the other state. National reciprocity works for marriage licenses and drivers license, but not gun permits. Makes no sense.

18 posted on 10/29/2025 3:37:20 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Democrats seek power through cheating and assassination. They are sociopaths. They just want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ›๐Ÿ›๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™โœ๏ธโœ๏ธ


19 posted on 10/29/2025 3:39:01 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

National reciprocity works for marriage licenses and drivers license, but not gun permits. Makes no sense.


I understand and agree, but AZ issues a concealed-firearms permit that allows you to carry concealed in AZ (and those states that choose to recognize AZ’s permits to be valid in their states). California refuses to recognize any state’s CFP. And of course it refuses to recognize the fact that most states no longer require any permit to carry a concealed firearm.

As for drivers licenses, a few states, oddly the ones most opposed to concealed carry from other states, are now under fire for granting commercial drivers licenses for illegal aliens who are killing people with their reckless driving.

It is a symptom of how divided our nation has become. Blue states want us disarmed, have men in girls/women’s sports and bathrooms, and benefits for illegals.

A bit of an oddity for you. I live in MO and it is perfectly legal for me to buy ammunition, in Illinois by just showing my drivers license. A resident of Illinois is required to show something called a FOID to legally buy ammo.


20 posted on 10/29/2025 3:54:51 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson