Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Republicans considering bill to keep SNAP benefits flowing amid the shutdown
Politico ^ | 10/22/2025, 8:11pm ET | Jordain Carney

Posted on 10/22/2025 8:11:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

Mistake.

That constituency will NEVER vote Republican.


21 posted on 10/22/2025 9:29:03 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A “life-line” for the democrats,,,,,,disgusting!


22 posted on 10/22/2025 9:32:16 PM PDT by volare737 ( Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Agreed. If the Republicans are the first to BLINK,,,,,,the fight is over.


23 posted on 10/22/2025 9:35:21 PM PDT by volare737 ( Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
…the first order of business will be to swear in Arizona Democrat Representative Adelita Grijalva, who already declared that she would immediately file a discharge motion to force the Epstein files out of committee for a full floor vote.

I understand Johnson is holding up her swearing in for some form of leverage, but that discharge motion is going to be filed - sooner or later.

24 posted on 10/22/2025 9:44:19 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Broken record....if there welas dirt on trump or ant republican of significance, it would have been put out during obama admin...were it so, would have been easier and more effective than russiagate. Of course if deep state people in fbi have since changed info, or victims are willing to embellish on a list that they have (because no one can call them liars) then that explains the unprecedented urgency. Transprent.


25 posted on 10/22/2025 9:55:56 PM PDT by angrymarine (I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wouldn’t it be best that the ghettopotami go without of food for a bit to slim down?


26 posted on 10/22/2025 9:59:05 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Need to use this as a immediate local basis for recall petitions. You want SNAP turned back on? Sign this petition to recall idiot that wont let you have it. Desrving poor and single moms plus republicants ought to be enough to recall 3 to 5 senators. The excercise will slap them awake.


27 posted on 10/22/2025 9:59:38 PM PDT by angrymarine (I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen
73% of SNAP households have household income below the Federal Poverty Level.

Usual emotional responses posted here aside, that's a good analytical breakdown of SNAP use. I came up with just over 9% of the population are on the program while over 12% are said to be under the poverty line.

If that's true then SNAP is better managed than I thought it was and we shouldn't be so hasty to break out the torches and pitchforks over it. The blatant abusers of the program (welfare queens, illegals, etc.) make it appear that it's just a trough for scammers, but most recipients are not represented by those criminals.

The volunteer food banks have been overwhelmed since the last years of the Biden regime. The economy IS recovering - just not fast enough for a society grown too used to instant gratification.

28 posted on 10/22/2025 10:07:40 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (Conspiracies are too often facts yet to be confirmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Owen
From AI:

Please describe a typical SNAP recipient:

Typical AI bullshit

GIGO

29 posted on 10/22/2025 10:42:21 PM PDT by HIDEK6 (God bless Donald Trump )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MikelTackNailer

✅📌


30 posted on 10/22/2025 10:47:47 PM PDT by Varsity Flight ( "War by 🙏 the prophesies set before you." ) I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite warriors. 10.5.6.5 These Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Newscum’s got the California National Guard handing out food at food banks. They should be helping ICE round up illegals. I’m sure the food they’re handing out will be going to illegals who shouldn’t be getting it.


31 posted on 10/22/2025 10:59:37 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury
True, but I don't think it's for leverage.

From what I read, Johnson is taking a hard line because he sees the discharge motion as an attack on his authority and ability to set and control the agenda.

The problem for Johnson is that, despite Grijalva, there are enough Republicans who are willing to side with the Democrats on this.

-PJ

32 posted on 10/22/2025 11:09:14 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

42,000,000 people in the United States have SNAP benefits? 1 out of 8? Ridiculous.


33 posted on 10/22/2025 11:24:58 PM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Trump & Vance, 2024! (Formerly) Goldwater & Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Tue disgrace is that there are 42 million Americans, mostly women, using the SNAP program.


34 posted on 10/22/2025 11:54:41 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No. Just no.


35 posted on 10/23/2025 12:29:44 AM PDT by Rocco DiPippo (Either the Deep State destroys America or we destroy the Deep State. -Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Excellent point. I guarantee that the rate of morbid obesity among the SNAP crowd is off the charts. A little fasting would be good for those folks. But let’s be honest - even if SNAP’s shut down for a while, none of the recipients will go hungry. Food banks, churches, donations, etc.


36 posted on 10/23/2025 12:33:28 AM PDT by Rocco DiPippo (Either the Deep State destroys America or we destroy the Deep State. -Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

No military pay, no snap. Funding the military was in the Constitution…….not free food.


37 posted on 10/23/2025 2:18:20 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: angrymarine

You can not recall a US Senator or Congressman.


38 posted on 10/23/2025 2:39:23 AM PDT by Iceclimber58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If it’s the “Schumer Shutdown”, why would anyone advocate softening the effect? Let the Ghettopotomai lose a few pounds, by cutting off their grape soda and Cheetos.
I have yet to see any photos of malnourished children sitting along the curbs in Chicago.


39 posted on 10/23/2025 2:45:48 AM PDT by Fireone (1.Avoid crowds 2.Head on a swivel 3.Be prepared to protect & defend those around you 4.Avoid crowds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t think there will be food riots, exactly...but I do think there will be massive shop lifting and theft of people in parking lots. There is a lot of feral braggadocio on Youtube about it.

42 million folks is a lot of dependents. An absurd amount. And a lot of these folks treat EBT and a birthright, not aid. It is really time to tighten the rules and cull folks who could work but don’t.
Now is a perfect opportunity.


40 posted on 10/23/2025 4:06:50 AM PDT by Adder (End fascism...defeat all Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson