Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin says Tomahawk supply to Ukraine would destroy U.S. relations
Reuters.com ^ | October 5, 20254:01 AM CDT | Reuters

Posted on 10/05/2025 5:08:58 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

MOSCOW, Oct 5 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said that if the United States supplied Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine for long-range strikes deep into Russia then it would lead to the destruction of Moscow's relationship with Washington.

Less than two months since U.S. President Donald Trump met Putin at a summit in Alaska, peace looks even further away with Russian forces advancing in Ukraine, Russian drones allegedly flying in NATO airspace and now Washington talking about direct participation in striking deep into the world's biggest nuclear power.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

Trump has said he is disappointed with Putin for not making peace and has cast Russia as a "paper tiger" for failing to subdue Ukraine. Putin last week hit back, questioning if NATO was not the "paper tiger" for failing to stop Russia's advance.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance said last month that Washington was considering a Ukrainian request to obtain long-range Tomahawks that could strike deep into Russia, including Moscow, though it is unclear if a final decision has been made.

"This will lead to the destruction of our relations, or at least the positive trends that have emerged in these relations," Putin said in a video clip released on Sunday by Russian state television reporter Pavel Zarubin.

The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the United States will provide Ukraine with intelligence on long-range energy infrastructure targets in Russia, as it weighs whether to send Kyiv missiles that could be used in such strikes. Two officials confirmed the Journal report to Reuters.

But one U.S. official and three other sources told Reuters that the Trump Administration's desire to send long-range Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine may not be viable because current inventories are...


(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: proxywar; ukraine; welfarewar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 10/05/2025 5:08:58 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Good think it won’t be happening from the US.


2 posted on 10/05/2025 5:11:23 PM PDT by xone ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’d like to know anything that has come from these supposedly “good relations”.


3 posted on 10/05/2025 5:30:26 PM PDT by Williams (Thank God for the election of President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What good relations?


4 posted on 10/05/2025 5:37:13 PM PDT by null and void (The only man in all of Scotland is a 14 year old girl...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Because we get along so well now.

It’s time for Moscow to feel some pain.


5 posted on 10/05/2025 5:39:04 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How would we react if we knew an organization, another country was selling long-range ordnance that could strike anywhere in the USA, and someone planned to use it?
I think Pootie poot is saying something quite different than, ‘It would be regrettable if we could no longer be friendly.’


6 posted on 10/05/2025 5:41:00 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Putin has already destroyed U.S. relations. When you attempt to play President Trump the result is a bad reward.


7 posted on 10/05/2025 5:41:40 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftniks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

You can’t just reverse things for countries like North Korea and Russia and iran and China.


8 posted on 10/05/2025 5:44:11 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

“How would we react if we knew an organization, another country was selling long-range ordnance that could strike anywhere in the USA, “

The Tomahawk can’t do that!


9 posted on 10/05/2025 5:44:29 PM PDT by TexasGator (The 750 hp Florida Gnat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

“How would we react if we knew an organization, another country was selling long-range ordnance that could strike anywhere in the USA, and someone planned to use it?”

Putin could call off his invasion of Ukraine ...


10 posted on 10/05/2025 5:51:02 PM PDT by TexasGator (The 750 hp Florida Gnat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“or at least the positive trends that have emerged in these relations,”

LOL! Putin has destroyed any possible relationship with Trump.


11 posted on 10/05/2025 5:53:32 PM PDT by TexasGator (The 750 hp Florida Gnat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not our fight. And Tommies are 40 year old tech and not the threat they used to be. Scrap them and replace with drone mothership hypersonic that can launch dozens of drones as they near the target. Probably cheaper and more deadly.


12 posted on 10/05/2025 5:57:58 PM PDT by Battlestar (Tired of transgenders, drug addicts, and mentally ill taking over our streets, schools, government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Battlestar

They aren’t 40 year old tech, they are built to be easily upgraded with available future tech.


13 posted on 10/05/2025 6:03:34 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The two Dwarf Leaders are both dictators.
The EU has washed their hands of it monetarily.
No reason why the US should be involved anymore because EU leaders are making fun of and blaming Trump because he has tried to stop the war.
May the best dwarf leader win……no one gives a shit anymore…..and the US should not be involved in a proxy dwarf war with Russia.


14 posted on 10/05/2025 6:05:20 PM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Relations between US and Russia? And the EU --- Well, here's a few links.

"Last year, the U.S. imported about $1.27 billion in Russian fertilizers, slightly more than the $1.14 billion in 2021. The U.S. also imported enriched uranium and plutonium from Russia worth about $624 million in 2024, compared to $646 million in 2021. Russia also exported palladium to the U.S. worth about $878 million in 2024, compared to $1.59 billion in 2021."

What Russian goods the U.S. and EU continue to import despite war in Ukraine New Voice of Ukraine, via MSN, 15 September 2025

"Mainly, nitrogen fertilizer supplies increased – by a quarter, to $66.4 million. Purchases of potash fertilizers also increased – by almost 5%, to $18.5 million in January. The US almost did not buy mixed fertilizers – it is about $613 thousand tons against 568 thousand tons previously.

"The main buyers of Russian fertilizers were China, Brazil and India."

US companies increased fertilizer purchases from Russia by 20% Ukrainian Shipping Magazine, 12 March 2025

"This result allowed exporters from Russia to take second place in Top of the leading suppliers. Canada came in first place with $325.1 million, and Saudi Arabia came in third. Compared to February 2025, shipments to the United States doubled, and compared to March 2024 - by 25%. We are talking about shipments of urea and potassium chloride."

The states are buying up massively produced in Russian fertilizers EAD, 7 May 2025

"...there is significant dependence on Russia for certain stable radioisotopes used to produce medical radioisotopes for cancer treatment and the EU needs to increase efforts to develop EU production of such medical radioisotopes for the benefit of all Member States."

Source: COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS European Commisson, 12 May 2025.

"The Proposal will now be subject to the ordinary legislative procedure that requires approval from the European Parliament as well as a qualified majority of the EU Member States.."

Source: EU Proposes Regulation to Phase Out Russian Natural Gas Imports: Key Measures and Implications Mayer-Brown, 27 June 2025

The US and Europe are still doing billions of dollars’ worth of business with Russia despite years of war CNN, 14 August 2025.

"The Russian Federation retains dominant market positions in several strategic categories. It supplies: 83.85% of U.S. imports of phosphatic fertilizer mixes; 49.58% of urea-ammonium nitrate fertilizers; 45.34% of unwrought palladium; 44.67% of buckwheat,"

Source: U.S. Imports from Russia Surge in 2025, Led by Fertilizers and Metals GTAIC, 20 August 2025.

"When examining the top US imports from Russia, several key products stand out as significant contributors to the trade relationship between the two countries. As per Russia customs export data for 2024, among the biggest products that the US imports from Russia are fertilizers, metals and minerals such as iron, steel, and precious metals, as well as coal. These imports play a vital role in various industries across the United States and underscore the interdependence of the global economy. "

Source: US-Russia Bilateral Trade: What products does the US import from Russia? US Import Data, 13 March 2025.

And good old NATO member Turkey is buying and trading Russian energy products.

This is a bit like the old, old joke about "Fish on Friday Catholics" where the family "blesses" the beef roast as "fish today."

15 posted on 10/05/2025 6:06:44 PM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sorry, Pooty, Trump is working on the FO stage of your “relationship” now.

You screwed the pooch.


16 posted on 10/05/2025 6:06:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (Terrorism has been institutionalized by the left. Ask no quarter. Give no quarter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Putin could block the delivery of Tomahawks by withdrawing from Ukraine.


17 posted on 10/05/2025 6:26:39 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Correct but are those upgrades what the Ukes would be getting?


18 posted on 10/05/2025 6:38:37 PM PDT by desertsolitaire (hite sea. My grandfather shouted warning to anyone who would listen that the Titanic was going to st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

POTUS is not stupid.

Ukraine will not get Tomahawks.


19 posted on 10/05/2025 6:51:48 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“The Tomahawk can’t do that!”

1,500 mile range puts all of European Russia in range.


20 posted on 10/05/2025 6:54:12 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson