Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House tables Mace push to remove Omar from committees over Kirk comments
The Hill ^ | 09/17/25 | Emily Brooks

Posted on 09/17/2025 9:44:25 PM PDT by fluorescence

The House on Wednesday voted to table a resolution brought forward by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) to formally reprimand Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and remove her from her committee assignments after Mace alleged she “smeared Charlie Kirk and implied he was to blame for his own murder” in re-posting a video on social media.

Mace had forced action on the matter through a privileged resolution to censure Omar and strip her committee assignments, but Democrats moved to table the matter, thereby rejecting it.

The House voted 214-213 to table the resolution, with four Republicans voting with Democrats to defeat Mace’s anti-Omar effort.

Those four Republicans were Reps. Mike Flood (Neb.), Jeff Hurd (Colo.), Tom McClintock (Calif.) and Rep. Cory Mills (Fla.) who was facing a retaliatory censure and was the deciding vote at the last minute.

Omar after the vote thanked her “colleagues for having my back and not furthering lies on the House floor.”

“Appreciate them safeguarding first amendment protections and the usage of the censure. Finally some sanity in the House,” she posted on X.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries excoriated Mace in a statement ahead of the vote.

“Nancy Mace is a complete and total disgrace. Her racist, unhinged and xenophobic comments about Congresswoman Ilhan Omar are beneath the dignity of the Congress. Is this what civility looks like in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives?” Jeffries said.

“We live in an era of intense political violence as we have seen with the recent assassinations of Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. Nancy Mace’s crazed rhetoric has put a target on the back of Rep. Omar. Mace must cease and desist her inciteful behavior immediately,” Jeffries said.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: charliekirk; ilhanomar; nancymace; omar; republicants; thesquad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 09/17/2025 9:44:25 PM PDT by fluorescence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Dang! Would have enjoyed seeing this pass. Boo, hiss to the House.


2 posted on 09/17/2025 9:48:27 PM PDT by gildafarrell (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Really hate Congress they embrace evil and corruption no matter the Party.


3 posted on 09/17/2025 9:59:00 PM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

If demonicRATS move to remove Mace from her committee assignments, I’ll bet Republicans will neuter themselves and vote yes.


4 posted on 09/17/2025 9:59:14 PM PDT by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

McClintock. I don’t get him. Been there too long I guess.


5 posted on 09/17/2025 10:02:38 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Nancy is good for the Party when she is laser focused on problems and events outside of her own personal experience.
This (removing Omar from committee assignments due to her slanderous remarks on Kirk) was a good topic to be raised for discussion, even though it lacks enough support to remove Cong. Omar at this particular time.


6 posted on 09/17/2025 10:04:50 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Rino turn coats!


7 posted on 09/17/2025 10:07:49 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing)like he had it with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Four GOP scumbag traitors need to have hard lives in the future...


8 posted on 09/17/2025 10:18:14 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Uniparty wants to uniparty. Just enough.


9 posted on 09/17/2025 10:25:08 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Worthless people


10 posted on 09/17/2025 10:28:45 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Dont worry omar, the uniparty has your back... spit!


11 posted on 09/17/2025 10:31:08 PM PDT by Bob434 (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
Nancy is good for the Party when she is laser focused on problems and events outside of her own personal experience.

In her case, it's an asset because she's not corrupt or prone to blackmail.

However due to her trauma (most likely due to being the first female cadet at Citadel) she does not have the temperament required to be an executive (Governor).

12 posted on 09/17/2025 10:33:59 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence
Mike Flood - (202) 225-4806

Jeff Hurd - (202) 225-4676

Tom McClintock - (202) 225-2511

Cory Mills - (202) 225-4035

13 posted on 09/17/2025 10:45:13 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (Everyone that voted Trump/R in '24 needs to show up in '26.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I agree. Nancy has many fine abilities as a politician, but wherever she goes in life, she carries some heavy emotional baggage with her. Most of it has never been unpacked, inventoried and examined.

She paid a high price to become the ‘First’ female cadet. I admire her ambition, but I still think some branches of service should remain structured for one sex only, either for men or for women.


14 posted on 09/17/2025 10:46:33 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence
Those four Republicans were Reps. Mike Flood (Neb.), Jeff Hurd (Colo.), Tom McClintock (Calif.) and Rep. Cory Mills (Fla.) who was facing a retaliatory censure and was the deciding vote at the last minute.

Conservatives residing in any of those four states: Take note!

Regards,

15 posted on 09/17/2025 11:11:10 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence


16 posted on 09/17/2025 11:37:00 PM PDT by Iron Munro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Grand Old Pukes do it again.


17 posted on 09/18/2025 3:38:40 AM PDT by cp124 (Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Anti-American Scum

Mike Flood - (202) 225-4806
Jeff Hurd - (202) 225-4676
Tom McClintock - (202) 225-2511
Cory Mills - (202) 225-4035


18 posted on 09/18/2025 3:40:33 AM PDT by cp124 (Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fluorescence

Ugh….Cory Mills is the one currently facing legal action from an ex-girlfriend for assault. No wonder he voted not to censure and remove….lthe dems were trying to censure him.


19 posted on 09/18/2025 3:46:29 AM PDT by liberalh8ter ( This tagline has taken the month off to attend the inauguration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cp124
You have to wonder that only four representatives switched sides on this matter. It is likely that Speaker Johnson did not want the censure and ensured that the minimum four representatives from purple districts jumped sides. President Trump has bigger issues and likely did not want to expend political capital on what amounts to theater. In the case of McClintock, he may be gerrymandered out of his district if the California Legislature goes through on the threat of redistricting to eliminate Republican seats. There are likely several dozen other RINOs who would have voted against censure but did not want to take the political risk unless necessary.
20 posted on 09/18/2025 3:53:05 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson