Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crime Crackdown in D.C. Shows Trump Administration’s Uneasy Relationship With Guns
The New York Times ^ | Sept. 1, 2025, 9:36 a.m. ET | Glenn Thrush

Posted on 09/01/2025 2:52:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

If President Trump’s actions were intended to drive a law-and-order wedge between Democratic big-city leaders and their constituents, it has also exposed a division in his own coalition.

The Trump administration’s crackdown on crime in Washington has been propelled, in part, by an aggressive clampdown on guns, with city and federal officials confiscating around 150 weapons since the president declared a crime emergency in the capital nearly three weeks ago.

“I’m pleased to report another 105 arrests have been made and 12 illegal guns taken off the streets of Washington, DC,” Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on social media on Thursday. It was part of her near-daily tally of gun seizures, an effort spearheaded by Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia.

Under almost any other president, heralding a gun sweep would not be notable. But the shift toward gun enforcement — and publicizing the aggressive street sweeps — marks an abrupt departure for an administration that has courted Second Amendment maximalists and sharply downgraded federal firearms enforcement.

President Trump’s political appointees rolled back Biden-era regulations and diverted officials assigned to weapons cases to immigration raids. The White House has also proposed steep cuts to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and installed disengaged, inexperienced leaders to oversee its increasingly marginalized work force.

While these moves have not exposed major political divisions, they have caused some uneasiness among gun-rights supporters who are concerned that law-and-order officials like Ms. Pirro, who once supported restrictions on assault rifles, will create a chilling effect on legal gun owners in the district and in the surrounding area.

“It sends a message we don’t like,” said Luis Valdes, the Florida director of Gun Owners of America, an influential gun rights group that has pushed for the repeal of most federal gun_laws...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; crime; dc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
DC has draconian gun laws that are just being enforced.

No one is above the law, after all.

1 posted on 09/01/2025 2:52:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The New York Times has an uneasy relationship with reality.


2 posted on 09/01/2025 2:53:15 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sounds like the NY Slimes don’t realize that there are LEGALLY OWNED GUNS and ILLEGAL GUNS. In fact, I don’t think The NY Slimes know that Legal and Illegal are opposites.


3 posted on 09/01/2025 2:55:18 PM PDT by Semper Vigilantis (Peace - through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We have a ‘thing’ about ILLEGAL guns, not legal guns. This cub Reporter is a dumb*ss.


4 posted on 09/01/2025 2:56:54 PM PDT by silent majority rising (When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Most murders in this country are committed by felons.

A felon with a single round of ammo is subject to five years in federal prison.

Obama and Biden Maladministration both ignored this and let felons off without prosecuting.

I suspect that the gun crackdown is against felons and known criminals.


5 posted on 09/01/2025 2:57:59 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Second amendment supports are fine with illegal guns being taken. The New York Times just likes to cause division.


6 posted on 09/01/2025 2:59:06 PM PDT by vaskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hey, NY Slimes?

I have absolutely NO PROBLEM with illegal guns taken from the cold, dead hands of working domestic criminal terrorists and loony-tunes trans killers! THIS is one of the things I voted for!

Leave the rest of us ALONE!


7 posted on 09/01/2025 3:00:46 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It has been ruled by the Supreme Court that criminals, until they complete their sentences, can be disarmed. What Trump is doing is perfectly Constitutional.


8 posted on 09/01/2025 3:03:00 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Pornography feeds abortion. Abortion is Satan's ultimate effort to hurt God. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The New York Times has an uneasy relationship with reality.


Exactly right. They love guns in the hands to their chosen authoritarians/totalitarians.

They hate guns in the hands of ordinary people.


9 posted on 09/01/2025 3:03:08 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semper Vigilantis

Lol …. Just like immigrants


10 posted on 09/01/2025 3:06:04 PM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

OK, a stupid question here. What is an ‘illegal gun’? Is it a firearm possessed by someone barred by law from possessing a firearm? Is it a firearm that was obtained by illegal means—theft, straw purchase, etc.? Or a firearm whose whole type has been declared illegal such as a machine gun/glock switch?

In any case, I think the crackdown really involves people who are illegally in possession of a firearm. I seriously doubt that the firearms themselves have committed any crimes, though they may have been used by humans in the commission of crimes.


11 posted on 09/01/2025 3:06:54 PM PDT by hanamizu ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

For DC safety and freedom, id like to see EVERY legal citizen, 100%, own and be well trained with firearms


12 posted on 09/01/2025 3:11:11 PM PDT by C210N (Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

More distortions to the point of lies by the times. Gee, what a surprise.


13 posted on 09/01/2025 3:14:20 PM PDT by GrumpyOldGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Causin, you know, it’s always them darn guns. Them guns just keep shootin folks. If there were no guns there would be no murders.


14 posted on 09/01/2025 3:19:44 PM PDT by Sir Bangaz Cracka (Poor 'lil Travon bees slamming dat white cracka'a head into dat sidewalk causin he be scared)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Crime Crackdown in D.C. Shows Trump Administration’s Uneasy Relationship With Guns"
15 posted on 09/01/2025 3:25:46 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
12 illegal guns taken off the streets of Washington, DC,” Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on social media

In DC, that's the equivalent of removing 12 grains of sand from a beach.

16 posted on 09/01/2025 3:26:09 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising

Gee, I wonder if they were registered? Fidiots!


17 posted on 09/01/2025 3:42:30 PM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍! Winning currently!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

NY Slimes has no clue about what the word ILLEGAL means.


18 posted on 09/01/2025 3:44:01 PM PDT by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vaskypilot

There is the problem that some folks would say “Then we will just make all guns illegal”.

So I wouldn’t like to lean too hard on that particular argument.


19 posted on 09/01/2025 3:46:18 PM PDT by Inquiring Minds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The NYT must have a division of making crap up.


20 posted on 09/01/2025 3:50:28 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson