Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/24/2025 11:45:10 AM PDT by Rummyfan
Jackson went ballistic after her colleagues reversed another district court judge who issued a sweeping injunction barring the Trump Administration from canceling roughly $783 million in grants in the National Institutes of Health.
Again writing alone, Jackson unleashed a tongue-lashing on her colleagues, who she suggested were unethical, unthinking cutouts for Trump. She denounced her fellow justices, stating, “This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this administration always wins.”
For some of us who have followed Jackson’s interestingly controversial tenure on the court, it was crushingly ironic. Although Jackson accused her colleagues of following a new rule that they must always rule with Trump, she herself is widely viewed as the very embodiment of the actual rule of the made-up game based on the comic strip of Calvin and Hobbes. In Jacksonian jurisprudence, it often seems like there are no fixed rules, only fixed outcomes. She then attacks her colleagues for a lack of integrity or empathy.
To quote Calvin, Jackson proves that “there’s no problem so awful that you can’t add some guilt to it and make it even worse.”
Jackson has attacked her colleagues in opinions, shattering traditions of civility and restraint. Her colleagues have clearly had enough. She now regularly writes diatribes that neither of her fellow liberals — Justices Sonia Sotomayor or Elena Kagan — are willing to sign on to. Indeed, she has raged against opinions that her liberal colleagues have joined.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
If she has managed to alienate Sotomayor and Kagan that is really something.
KBJ was a bad pick by Joe Biden because her idiocy got Sotomayor and Kagan to agree with the Conservative Majority on a couple of decisions.
The other 8 should sit back and see what Ketanji wants — and then vote the other way. I’d like to see a lot of 8-1 decisions.
She needs to sing the “I’m Sorry” song.
Can’t they just vote her out of Fight Club?
It's already starting to happen.
I thought she didn’t know what a ball was.
Americas first, and hopefully last, DEI Supreme Court Justice!
DemocRAt judges are aptly described by the phrase, “Glittering jewels of colossal ignorance”.
In actuality, however, it’s worse, because we know that they know that their logic isn’t even on the level of mainstream press crap, but they pretend that it is...because one can always befuddle the mainstream media. After all...journalism degrees...Hello!!!
“I thought she didn’t know what a ball was.”
And this is from The Hill - even they can see that Katoken has no business being in the Supreme Court building except as a charwoman (which she also couldn’t define).
Kadisha Jackson brown. Male or female? Don’t ask ‘her’ cause ‘she’ can’t define it. Useless? YUP! Epitome of dei.
That was obvious, she doesn’t know what a woman is, which puts her intellect below that of a 5 year old.
KBJ: “This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this administration always wins.”
####################
It is NOT her job to keep political score, and by clear implication, she is allowing politics to guide her decision.
Her job is to interpret the Constitution. She is obviously NOT doing that. She is putting the political climate AHEAD of the Constitution.
Unfortunately, impeachment of a Supreme Court Justice requires a 2/3 vote of the US Senate, so that will never happen.
The three Republican senators who voted for Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson were:
Susan Collins of Maine
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
Mitt Romney of Utah
The first rule of Fight Club is: you do not talk about Fight Club.
The second rule of Fight Club is: you do not talk about Fight Club.
Dems who support her don’t care what she says or writes, only what her vote produces. It’s the same with their hoped for voters: They don’t care if they’re educated - in fact, the less the better - only how they vote. Ditto illegal aliens: Doesn’t matter the economic, cultural or criminal effect, just the vote.
Because dems have only one rule: win.
FTA-—Jackson accused her colleagues of following a “new rule” that “they must always rule with Trump,” she herself is widely viewed as the very embodiment of the actual rule of the made-up game based on the comic strip of Calvin and Hobbes. In Jacksonian jurisprudence, it often seems like there are no fixed rules, only fixed outcomes. She then attacks her colleagues for a lack of integrity or empathy.
To quote Calvin, Jackson proves that “there’s no problem so awful that you can’t add some guilt to it and make it even worse.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.