Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump vs. the Populist Mob
American Thinker ^ | August 2, 2025 | Douglas Schwartz

Posted on 08/02/2025 10:02:48 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Today’s Trump isn’t the original Trump.  Watch ancient videos, on Oprah (1988) or testifying before Congress (1991).  (Believe it or not, Democrats were then thoughtful legislators, not Marxist juveniles or foreign-born terrorists.)

Trump was originally a public intellectual.  What happened?  Pro wrestling.  And secondarily, the Apprentice series (2004–2014).  The World Wrestling Hall of Fame (2013) was an Oval Office stepping stone.  Adopting an intellectual public persona would have been political poison.  Today’s Trump is an assumed persona feeding the mob’s appetites.  By 2007, he was grounding and pounding Vince McMahon in the Battle of Billionaires.  Along his path to the presidency, Trump was a beauty pageant impresario (1996–2015) and founding chairman of the Rosie O’Donnell Fan Club. 

By 2015, discussions of depreciation schedules, passive losses, and housing policies were abandoned:

When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best.  They’re not sending you.  ... They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us.  They’re bringing drugs.  They’re bringing crime.  They’re rapists.  And some, I assume, are good people.

(Trump’s tricolon of “They’re bringing A, B, C” represents a 21st-century rhetorical flourish, bookending Lincoln’s “we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow.”)

The public Trump belongs to a separate genus from familiar political species.  Congressman James Traficant was one of the few political actors who also went full populist.  Congress eventually expelled him for bribery, but for political theater he was Academy Award material.  No court could convict Traficant of not being entertaining.  “Beam me up, Mr. Speaker.”  Traficant was so popular that when running for re-election from prison, he received 15% of the vote.  Whether he was buried with his toupée remains unknown.  Traficant’s estate could sue Trump for appropriating his act.  The Three Stooges’ Moe Howard never realized he...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: americanstinker; douglasschwartz; dumbingdownfr; multiplenicks; nevertrumper; populism; randpaulsucks; trollfarm
...Why would Trump want to bury the Russian hoax? Or the Epstein cottage industry? Because he has more pressing matters...

...There’s reasons we’ve witnessed the most effective debut of any administration. Trump is focused, racing against time. Interest on the debt is about to collapse the system. Control of Congress is fragile, awaiting the 2026 election. If the House is lost, it’s game over. There’s plenty of global chaos keeping him busy. Trump looks ahead. The blob looks behind, braying for red-meat clickbait. Gabbard’s confirmation of what everyone already knew provided the coda to a chapter, not a new one...

For the "Ready! Fire! Aim!" crowd.

1 posted on 08/02/2025 10:02:48 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
(Believe it or not, Democrats were then thoughtful legislators, not Marxist juveniles or foreign-born terrorists.)

No, they were America-hating traitors even then. By 1991, they had already set the table for the continuing disaster of illegal immigration and everything associated with it when they renegged on the deal for securing the border after Reagan granted amnesty for illegal aliens.

2 posted on 08/02/2025 10:20:18 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Great things about Trump are his ability to fight on multiple fronts simultaneously along with continuing the fight after a setback. On too many other fights the Republicans pick one and only one topic and the Democrats, media and courts (but I repeat myself) make a joint attack with the Republicans rereating on the first minor defeat like General McClellan.

I don't like Trump retreating on Epstein, but hopefully the recent Ghislaine Maxwell action is setting up a new line of attack.

3 posted on 08/02/2025 10:23:56 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (I refuse to call the left "progressive" because I do not see slavery to the government as progress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Excellent article. What it takes to preserve the Republic is not necessarily justice.

Trump is a stable genius. He has shown the ability over and over.


4 posted on 08/02/2025 10:28:40 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Trump was originally a public intellectual.

That has to be the stupidest thing I've heard in a while.

There's no problem with not being a "public intellectual."

But that's just not Trump.

5 posted on 08/02/2025 10:28:49 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And as usual, the elitist media can’t help but show who they are by demeaning and demonizing “the mob”, who is everyone that they don’t control, those that don’t follow their lead.

At worst, Trump meets people where they are.


6 posted on 08/02/2025 10:30:26 AM PDT by larrytown (A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t think MAGA populists are going to be abandoning Trump, but admitting that the government doesn’t want to tell the truth (and that people don’t want to hear it) is a very bitter pill.


7 posted on 08/02/2025 10:31:14 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes Trump is not the old Trump...


8 posted on 08/02/2025 10:36:43 AM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is the author stupid enough to think that he can put lipstick on a pig?

After reading his condescending elitist rant, I felt like he was just using higher level language to call Trump supporters deplorables much like Crooked Hillary had done a decade ago.

Only difference is Crooked Hillary called us deplorables out of anger and desperation as it wasn’t something she had given much thought to.

This elitist twit has evidently put some thought to the matter.


9 posted on 08/02/2025 10:45:48 AM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter
After reading his condescending elitist rant, I felt like he was just using higher level language to call Trump supporters deplorables much like Crooked Hillary had done a decade ago.

Yes, that's all this screed amounts to. "Trump fooled all you stupid WalMartians who voted for him. Bwooohahaha...."

10 posted on 08/02/2025 11:13:05 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: x

Poorly written and pointless D-


11 posted on 08/02/2025 11:55:56 AM PDT by central_va (The I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Never in my going-on 80 years have democrats been thoughtful legislators.


12 posted on 08/02/2025 12:22:55 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS

In 1991, Clarence Thomas was lifted over the top by three Democrat senators. Arizona’s Dennis DeConcini, a terrific guy. Sam Nunn, who was decent, and leftist Wyche Fowler who was running so scared that he dared not vote against a black Georgian.

The rest of them were pretty much like now.


13 posted on 08/02/2025 1:18:29 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: erkelly; x
"Never in my going-on 80 years have democrats been thoughtful legislators."

They have been, I (and you) just did not like the thoughts they had in their heads when they legislated. I'll give you an example.

Bill Clinton's Motor Voter Law. You should watch the video of when he signs the law. Who are those two people standing directly behind President Clinton? (the two people on his right[Forest green dress and grey suit])

That's Richard Cloward in the grey suit. Halfway off the screen is his wife, Frances Fox Piven in dark forest green. (Their photo is also the splash screen here at CSPAN before the video plays)

Their presence(Cloward and Piven's presence) during this ceremony tells you everything you need to know about just how revolutionary-centric this law really was and still is to this day. Pretty sure that F.F.Piven gave a speech too.

This was extremely well thought out; motor voter. No part of it whatsoever was accidental.

Cloward and Piven came up with the concept of using welfare to overload the system, and motor voter plays a part in that.

14 posted on 08/02/2025 3:37:59 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot vote our way out of these problems. The only way out is to activist our way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Donald Trump vs the presstitutes.... 😆

Just one Male Lion makes a difference
https://x.com/VideosVuvu/status/1951661055244931421


15 posted on 08/02/2025 6:51:29 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Making money now. Still want much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson