Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ghislaine Maxwell demands immunity to testify before House panel after subpoena
Just the News ^ | July 29, 2025 3:26pm | Natalia Mittelstadt

Posted on 07/29/2025 6:21:24 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

"Any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool," attorney David Oscar Marcus said

A lawyer for Ghislaine Maxwell, an associate of the late financier and convicted sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein, on Tuesday demanded his client receive immunity to testify before the House Oversight Committee, after the panel subpoenaed her last week.

Maxwell – convicted on the charges in 2021 and now serving a 20-year prison sentence – returned to the public spotlight after the Trump Justice Department recently said it was closing an investigation on Epstein, despite President Trump and allies in the agency having vowed to further investigate Epstein, whose death in prison while awaiting trial on new charges was ruled a suicide.

Maxwell solicited and groomed young women for Epstein. A major issue among those who want the Epstein probe to continue is whether he indeed had a "client list" of powerful men for such women. 

On Monday, she appealed to the Supreme Court to overturn her 2021 conviction for sex trafficking children.

Maxwell attorney David Oscar Marcus said in the appeal that his client's testimony to the committee could jeopardize efforts to overturn her conviction, The Hill news outlet reported.

“As you know, Ms. Maxwell is actively pursuing post-conviction relief—both in a pending petition before the United States Supreme Court and in a forthcoming habeas petition. Any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool,” Marcus wrote.

“Public reports – including your own statements – indicate that the Committee intends to question Ms. Maxwell in prison and without a grant of immunity. Those are non-starters. Ms. Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity.”

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: epsteindistraction; epsteinhysteria; epsteinhysterics; epsteinsmear; maxwell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/29/2025 6:21:24 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Demands”?


2 posted on 07/29/2025 6:26:25 PM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Good for her.

I hope she gets immunity from suicide.

L


3 posted on 07/29/2025 6:28:01 PM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, just duh... What is the drama queen Mz. Massie going to demand?
4 posted on 07/29/2025 6:30:04 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Psalm 2. Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Good points but she should be concerned about personal security more than anything else. I’m surprised she’s survived this long.


5 posted on 07/29/2025 6:39:10 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (Listen to me now, think about it later and cry about it some other day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Why on earth would she testify in front of congress?


6 posted on 07/29/2025 6:40:21 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Need 2/3 of house committee to agree for immunity. That means Dems must agree to it. I don’t know if Dems will know what DOJ knows after their interview? DOJ should know whether it’s worth it.
If Dems don’t know what she’ll say or if Dems are involved and Trump isn’t, my guess is they won’t allow immunity as the price for testifying.


7 posted on 07/29/2025 6:43:44 PM PDT by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Thankfully, Massie is not on the oversight committee that would be interviews Maxwell. He’s on transportation and judiciary. He really should be on no committees.
He’s a zero and a pox on the conservative movement. He has less power because he’s not a team player. GOP should strip him of all committee assignments.


8 posted on 07/29/2025 6:50:53 PM PDT by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wait, isn’t she already in jail. What does she need immunity from exactly? Is it being on double secret probation? Cause she is already there.


9 posted on 07/29/2025 6:57:51 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy
Why on earth would she testify in front of congress?

No clue.. why this 'woman' has done anything she has done before ... something out of the nether world. She is accustom to big time drama parties, and there is no place like the belly of Congress for high drama.

10 posted on 07/29/2025 7:06:34 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Psalm 2. Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
What does she need immunity from exactly?

Crimes that she has yet to be prosecuted for that will be revealed through her testimony.

11 posted on 07/29/2025 7:11:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of racism, anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman
“Demands”?

Yeah, otherwise she can easily go all 5th Amendment on her. She's already in jail. If she sings, her life may be endangered.
12 posted on 07/29/2025 7:51:09 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Especially if she has dirt on any of them…oh how they will squirm.


13 posted on 07/29/2025 7:51:21 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy
Why on earth would she testify in front of congress?

Gives her a chance to talk directly to her best customers.

14 posted on 07/29/2025 7:54:59 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy
Why on earth would she testify in front of congress?

I was wondering the same thing myself.

Seems like anything she would have to say would tend to incriminate her.

Also, unless she actually witnessed any person having sex with an underage victim, wouldn't her testimony be hearsay, not admissable anyway?

15 posted on 07/29/2025 7:55:31 PM PDT by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Immunity”: protection from Hillary’s suicide squad.


16 posted on 07/29/2025 8:01:12 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“Ghislaine Maxwell demands immunity to testify before House panel after subpoena”

oh hell, just let her plead the 5th to every question ...


17 posted on 07/29/2025 8:18:14 PM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She was the architect of this getting girls for Jeffrey people want to know if there where others involved well goto the source and let her testify. They keep trying to pin Trump to this by simple guilt by association. Since she is petitioning for a possible pardon that tells you all you need to know about what Maxwell would say about trumps involvement which is backed up by both Epsteins attorneys.


18 posted on 07/29/2025 8:35:27 PM PDT by Lod881019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lod881019

Ghislaine Maxwell thinks she is above it all Epstein said to have gotten her protection in his sweetheart plea deal almost 20 years ago.

Dershowitz says she deserves commutation of her sentence so let’s all bow down and pardon her?


19 posted on 07/29/2025 9:13:39 PM PDT by Nextrush (FREEDOM IS EVERYBODY'S BUSINESS, REMEMBER REV; NIEMOLLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
She just did "Queen for a Day" with the DOJ with a grant of immunity. If Congress really wanted her to talk, why would they not grant use immunity? It has been six years and nobody has been prosecuted except Maxwell. Not one person who went to Epstein's island for the purpose of having sex with underage girls has been prosecuted.
20 posted on 07/29/2025 9:35:08 PM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson