Posted on 07/25/2025 6:34:39 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
““Okay, yes, it’s true.”
I cannot imagine the legacy media ever getting to that one.
Steve Bannon in recent interview hinted that Trump may be going into Obama’s forged “birth certificate” once again. If so, it is about time to not just talk about it but get the controlling legal authorities to investigate that “issue” and also Obama using a back dated and forged draft registration card and an SSN stolen from a deceased person who lived and died in CT, a state Obama never lived in. All the forgery and fraud was done for a reason. Trump needs to order the DOJ and other agencies to dig into and find the true reason and facts, i.e., Obama is not who he says he is. Obama is a treasonous anti-American fraud and usurper. And who in our government helped Obama with his treason.
See: Interviewee Steve Cortes with Steve Bannon, at 51:48-52:10 minutes on Gttr, See: www gettr com /post/p3nn68nbdc0
“Hey Steve,
Visit this site and scroll down to the spring of 2009 to May 2011 full page newspaper advertorials run in the Washington Times National Weekly edition regarding Obama’s life narrative and ID document fraud “issues”: www kerchner com / protectourliberty / archives [dot] htm The nation reaped what it allowed to be sown with election of and swearing in of Barack Hussein Obama II, aka Barry Soetoro. The nation and powers to be were warned as these dozens of advertorial warned. But the powers to be chose to do nothing about these “issue” with who Obama really is. And that is how this Republic got to be in the shape it has been for the last 17 years or so. CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret), ProtectOurLiberty [dot] org”
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2025/07/22/obama-illegitimate-sheriff-joseph-arpaio/
http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org
But the powers to be chose to do nothing about these “issue”
//
But but but, if you remember..
.Nancy “ deemed” berry vetted.
Deemed.
Nancy’s weasel word of choice.
I think the funniest thing of all is that these people never learn.
Newt said it best.
Something to the effect of, “He’s the most Alpha Male you will ever meet. He is relentless against his foes.”
The Times and the others don’t realize still, that this kind of thing envigorates him.
He has been consistent since the beginning claiming that is was all a hoax.
Now they’re going to pin this Epstein thing on him.
I bet you the first thing, first thing they asked Ghislaine was:
“Did President Trump ever come to the island? Did he molest girls and women?”
Once she makes clear that Trump had nothing to do with Epstein, and Trump’s attorney holds a press conference and says this, the Times and others pushing the Trump-Epstein will fall apart.
Savage states immediately in his subtitle "a January 2017 intelligence assessment of Moscow’s election interference."
Notice how Savage states as an undisputed fact right at the top of the article that Moscow interfered in the election?
This is meant to anchor the reader on the fact that Russian interference is beyond dispute as they read the rest of the article, when the true fact is that Russian interference in the election is the core thing that is being disputed."
The entirety of the declassified documents show how Obama and his intelligence community leadership were planning to publish a long-researched Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) report declaring that Moscow did NOT have the means to interfere in the election (presumably to legitimize a Hillary Clinton win resulting from Democrat vote-fraud), but then pulled that ICA after Donald Trump won the election and rewrote it to say that Moscow DID interfere in the election (presumably to delegitimize Donald Trump's win as stolen by Putin).
The Obama team pulled the original ICA a few hours before it was scheduled to be delivered to President-Elect Trump, and then never gave him the manufactured ICA that said that Moscow interefered in the election in order for Trump to win.
Savage, in his attempt to undermine DNI Gabbard's declassified documents is using linguistic propaganda techniques to trick the reader into accepting his frame that it was a known fact all along that Russia was interfering in the election for Donald Trump.
-PJ
Exactly. If the Times says they dont say what Trump says they do…. Then they 100% do. Maybe the Times can a deep dive into overnight 180 the IC did on Russian collusion immediately after the meeting.
The gaslighting from the Times continues unabated.
Made ya look!
BS.
The link below shows the response by John Sexton to the NYT article. His conclusion is:
“Put it all together and maybe at some point a decent reporter might want to ask, or at least ponder for a moment, how many of these rushed judgements and outright lies by people like Brennan, Comey and Obama were really mistakes and how many were calculated efforts to hobble Trump’s administration before he could even take office. Maybe someday the NY Times will get there but it is not this day.”
NYT you just can’t cover for them anymore. You have made yourself irrelevant.
.
I think it’s important to know what lies they’r telling today, because half the country believes them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.