Posted on 07/17/2025 8:04:40 PM PDT by bitt
We already knew that Donald Trump was acquainted with Jeffrey Epstein. The two were both young New York City multi-millionaires back in the day and ran with some of the big dogs in a big town. There are photos of Epstein with Trump and his then-girlfriend, Melania. So one wonders why it would be BLOCKBUSTER news on the pages of the Wall Street Journal that Trump received an invitation to Epstein's 50th birthday before anyone with a badge and gun knew the financier was a sick pervert.
No, really, that's the big news from the Journal that has been leaking out through social media rumors all day long.
The Journal reports in an exclusive story that Trump wrote Epstein a bawdy note for his 50th and drew a picture. It was allegedly contained in a 50th birthday album compiled by Epstein's girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, and shown to the Journal by someone acquainted with this information.
Trump told the Journal that no, that ain't me:
This is not me. This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story. I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women. It's not my language. It's not my words.
Now, it's not as if Donald Trump isn't capable of trash-talking. You saw what he said about Rosie O'Donnell. And, being a multi-married man who, in his youth, went to Studio 54 with the beautiful people, Trump's been a loud and proud New Yorker for decades. That he may have attended a big-timer's 50th isn't news.
My colleague at RedState, Joe Cunningham, observes that the note wasn't even authenticated:
Here's what the Journal doesn't tell you: They provide no evidence that this letter was authenticated. No handwriting analysis. No chain of custody documentation. No forensic verification. Just their
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Sean Davis of the federalist did an actual search and found Trump has never used the term enigma. Like was in the card. Much less the fact the card was type written so they couldn’t analyze his handwriting.
It’s clear the card was fake and sounds like it was actually made by a woman listening to the wording.
Wall Street Journal got burned cause Trumps tariffs have proven the opposite of everything they posted and they were looking for a gotcha story. Well they got one and a probably a future settlement to prevent discovery.
Epstein was 50 in…2003
His first arrest for soliciting underage girls was…2006
Yep - and they didn’t learn a thing with the CBS settlement....
It is known that they had “docs”. It is unknown how many and what was in them.
I reiterate:
If there was a list that had detrimental info relating to conservatives, the previous admin would have released them. If they had info detrimental to liberals, the previous admin would have destroyed them.
Remember the story about the list was started by the obama admin.
Murdoch and his spawn are PURE EVIL.
Check out what his rags got away with in the UK.
They were hacking mobile phones.
I think a woman named Brooks took the fall for that.
As I remember Piers Morgan’s name came up tangentially although I’m not sure if he worked for Murdoch or his paper was doing the same kind of hacking.
I was talking with my wife about this.
The Wall Street Journal is notorious for being boring and having lots of numbers and detailed analysis of business issues.
This is like a Babylon Bee version of the Wall Street Journal.
Tear rags on sale $2.00
WSJ, call your lawyers, and prepare to bend over bigly for what’s coming.
We obviously read the same article/s at the same time and have very good memories. Thanks for the corroboration!
So what your saying is that when Trump gets to run again in 2028, he AinT going to be happy?
We should not bring up the 10 Commandments and this man in the same sentence… Certainly not the seven fruits of the spirit as articulated in Galatians… He’s anything from it, but if people are stuck in TDS (Trump Deep State) the coverups, the distractions, embracing autocracy just to “own the Libs” that’s up to them
Read Dr Steven Hassan
FACT: Supported him publicly from Summer 2016 nomination (review my FR posts for the facts then I’ll accept your apology) then dropped support based on his shameless photo op sellout in Singapore to Kim Jong Un in mid 2018 (which NO FReeper would have supported if that were a Democrat president offering such a grotesque and immoral appeasement to Stalinist)
He can only have two terms (2017-2021) (2025-2029) per the US Constitution. States will not certify him as a candidate. What is wrong with you people. RIDICULOUS point to argue.
Ain’t happening
It is not Trump who is bearing false witness against his neighbor on this thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.