Posted on 07/08/2025 8:59:13 AM PDT by Kazan
The government is lying about Jeffrey Epstein. Either they were lying then, or they’re lying now, maybe both. They don’t get to claim that there are no client lists after issuing statements going back over a decade saying there were “client lists.”
Were they lying then when they described Epstein as a “large trafficking ring”? Or are they lying now when claiming that the “ring” consisted of exactly two people and Prince Andrew?
#
Was the government lying then when they said they had thousands of hours of videos showing the most disgusting things imaginable? Or are they lying now when they maintain that the only thing that happened was 17-year-old girls giving Jeffrey a back massage with a happy ending (while gross, a far cry from “most disgusting things imaginable”)?
Speaking of video, the government claimed that the cameras outside of Epstein’s cell were malfunctioning (while the guards were napping), but now it posts 10 hours of video from the malfunctioning devices?
How did Epstein make his money? Why doesn’t the government know? Did he build a billion-dollar empire $9,999.99 at a time, and avoid reporting anything to the IRS ever?
Government officials start sounding like gender nonbinary people the second Epstein’s name comes up. They always talk about what he wasn’t and never about what he was. (“A nonbinary person is someone who doesn’t adapt to gender norms.” Well, duh, we asked for a definition of what nonbinary is, not what it isn’t.) #
The government is and has been lying about Epstein… the question is why?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
No clients. Yet Ghislaine Maxwell is in prison. Huh.
p
Losing ANY TRUST in BONGINO, BONDI and PATEL!!
“How did Epstein make his money?”
It is my belief that he made money via illegal information gathering.
Most of his guests were probably interested in stock tips and free food & drink and not the teenage girls he mysteriously kept around.
If those guests were proven to be beneficiaries of illegal investment information, that would open up a giant and very costly ‘can of worms’.
Epstein & Maxwell are only one organized criminal activity, that was allowed to continue in operation while:The corrupt:
- - politicians and so-called
- - "judges" and
- - "prosecutors" and
- - "cops"
. . . looked the other way. <-- THEY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED: Senators and Representatives (federal and state), U.S. Federal Judges and DoJ officials, area and regional "district" attorneys, judges, and law enforcement officials for the states of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, New Mexico, and Florida.
There are so many possibilities.
I wonder if a British royal family “request”, plus benefits, might have been a factor.
***********
Well there you have it. Nothing to see here...move along. /sarc
The "leak" of the memo (which conveniently occurred over the holiday weekend) was an intentional one by people in DOJ who didn't wanted to come out and publicly declare there was no client list and that no “further disclosure” of Epstein-related material “would be appropriate or warranted.” This is such an obvious coverup.
Does make you wonder what’s up, when even hardcore driven reformers get a peek, and start saying - “Nope!”
If someone (or ONES) in the government is lying, it becomes very difficult to ever get at the truth. We have been told that the latest round of high-up government officials are the best of the best in matters of honesty, yet something fishy seems to be going on here. It’s just like having Biden & his group back in charge & that’s certainly NOT what we voted for.
That is the rational decision.
Folks trying to avoid going there sound like Flat Earthers—making up excuses by the truckload.
“Losing ANY TRUST in BONGINO, BONDI and PATEL!!”
____________________________________
Very much THIS!!!!!!!!!
I am curious. Did Bill Barr’s earlier time with the CIA leave him open to stupid leverage?
Should we expect Maxwell out on appeal soon?
There are a few that think Patel and Bondi have a sandbag yet to swing. It better be significant.
This is on Trump. Bondi and Patel are following orders.
It would not have been as bad if they just said it was in the national interest to keep a lid on it. We would not have been happy about it but lying to our face is so much worse.
They have clearly sold out and are doing the bidding of others who are controlling the info. Bondi is a mere functionary so no real surprise there, but I expected more integrity out of Patel and Bongino given the intensity of their long histories of anti-Deep state rhetoric. They are huge disappointments.
Assuming the consequences of revealing what was going on with Epstein are so significant that Trump himself will back off, I can only speculate that Epstein was a government operation, either ours, or jointly with another country.
It has long been speculated that Epstein was a Mossad operation designed to entrap and blackmale leaders from all over the world.
Now I can certainly understand why Mossad would want to do this, so this idea seems plausible. I can also understand why the US deep state would want to do this, so that seems plausible.
I've read that Epstein has CIA connections, so this dovetails with the above theory(s).
But is this enough to make Trump back off? Trump is famously unwilling to back off from positions he has embraced, so whatever is causing this must be some sort of serious concern indeed.
Could it be that he is afraid to throw Israel under the bus? I can't see him having any love for the US Deep State, because those guys attempted to put him in prison.
Could it be Britain's government that would be in trouble?
Something is going on here, and whatever it is has Trump willing to stop talking about the subject and to also instruct his subordinates to attempt to discredit the subject.
I don't think Patel or Bondi knew what was going on when they first were handed this task. This is why they made all those statements that do not jive with what is being said now.
Aliens.
📌👀
Well, not exactly 10 hours. The very last minute of the record is missing. But it doesn't matter anyway, because the camera was pointing to the guards' station instead of a cell with a window and prisoner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.