Posted on 07/07/2025 3:45:06 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin
On Sunday night the Department of Justice and FBI released a document that concluded that notorious child predator Jeffrey Epstein did not have a “client list” and that he was not murdered but committed suicide.
The FBI released a video that shows an empty hallway in what they insist proves Epstein committed suicide.
The FBI memo says there is no evidence that Epstein blackmailed powerful political figures.
Additionally, the memo suggests that no further Epstein records will be released. ... Back in July 2022, The Gateway Pundit lawyers Marc Randazza and Jay Wolman of the Randazza Legal Group, along with GP General Counsel John Burns filed a motion to intervene in the Guiffre v. Maxwell case in the United States District Court for the District of New York.
GP asked the Court to unseal all records identifying Epstein’s sex clients.
TGP lawyers moved to intervene in the Ghislaine Maxwell case in the Southern District of New York.
However, in August 2022, something truly bizarre and unexpected happened.
An anonymous John Doe—literally styled by his lawyer as “John Doe”—filed an objection to TGP unsealing the sex client list … and the Court SIDED WITH THE JOHN DOE over the interests of the press and public to know what happened in one of the most remarkable court cases in US history.
What possible reason could John Doe have for not wanting the Epstein Sex Client List exposed?
We were very curious about Mr. John Doe. Who is this person and why is he the lone person fighting to keep the Epstein client list hidden from public view? What is his connection to Epstein? Why did the court side with this anonymous and powerful power player?
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
DOJ spent months scrubbing the Epstein client list to avoid revealing sensitive information about innocent victims. After scrubbing it for months, they found out that it didn’t exist.
Define “Client” and you have your answers
Define “Client” and you have your answers
The deep state continues...
This story totally destroys the “New FBI” before it even gets started!
Meet the new Boss, same as the old boss!
Did anyone really think that Deep State would leave the Trump Admin complete, undoctored files to work with?
If Deep State left anything for Trump, the info was likely incomplete, problematic, untrustworthy, loaded with false trails and laden with legal landmines.
I’ve always thought that Epstein was run by multiple Deep States and used to blackmail high profile targets, business people, royals, and pols.
If the network has been neutralized and the threat it posed ended, if that’s the best outcome we get, I will take it.
There is a list..
What the people did on this list is the issue.
If nobody was trafficked then why were Epstein and now Maxwell in prison?
Sigh.
Folks, see my reply #8.
And if I’m wrong and the threat has not yet been dealt with, the president will handle it.
One more thought...
We clearly don’t know what’s going on.
If our enemies are also in the dark...
Works for me.
Our side is engaged in subterfuge.
Their side has only name-calling.
“Blondie Bondi.”
They are weak, and we already know what else they are.
Unpaid parking tickets
Even if we were to get an unredacted client list, nothing would change. It’s inadmissible evidence; Biden and his handlers made sure of that.
That’s pretty much what I’ve been trying to tell people from day 1.
But people don’t like giving up the idea of one perfect golden bullet that will solve everything they think is wrong.
And don’t forget we’re saving someone for last.
Existance of a list, has been assumed.
Jeeze.. Wait, What?... What a memory that stirs up!!
10-15 years ago all 3 of my kids went thru a phase of using that as a response to ANYTHING said to them. it got so bad I I took their phone for the day every time they said it!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.