Posted on 06/19/2025 8:25:58 AM PDT by Twotone
A federal judge in California has halted the Trump administration’s effort to dismantle the State Department’s Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R-FIMI) Hub, formerly known as the Global Engagement Center (GEC).
In a June 13 order, US District Judge Susan Illston declared that the planned elimination of the unit, part of a broader push by the administration to downsize the federal government, violates an earlier injunction.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio may have prematurely celebrated the end of R-FIMI back in April when he said the censorship unit was “dead.”
Despite his announcement, legal barriers remain in place, preserving the agency’s existence. For now.
Through the intervention of the federal judiciary, R-FIMI, a program with a $50 million annual budget that has drawn fire for suppressing online speech under the pretense of combating “foreign disinformation,” has been granted an unexpected lifeline.
The agency, a legacy of the Obama administration, was launched in 2016 to monitor and counter alleged foreign propaganda, particularly from Russia.
But over time, its activities expanded into domestic spheres, drawing allegations that it pressured social media platforms to silence certain political voices ahead of the 2020 election.
Judge Illston’s ruling came in response to growing concerns from federal employee unions over sweeping executive actions they argue circumvent congressional oversight. The case, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, challenges President Trump’s February Executive Order 14210, which called for widespread agency reorganizations and staff reductions across multiple departments, including State.
Illston previously issued a preliminary injunction on May 9 barring these cuts.
In Friday’s order, she directly addressed the State Department’s attempt to move forward with plans to shutter R-FIMI, stating, “actions to be taken pursuant to the State Department’s reorganization plans…are prohibited by the Court’s injunctive relief, as are all final separations scheduled in the State Department’s Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference program.”
She added a pointed directive: “If the State Department has any question about whether planned actions fall within the scope of the Court’s injunction, the Court ORDERS the Department to first raise those questions with the Court before taking action.”
Rubio’s attempt to sidestep the court’s prior ruling and sunset the R-FIMI unit has now been frozen, part of the ongoing legal tug-of-war over executive authority and the role of the judiciary in restraining or enabling bureaucratic overhaul.
For now, R-FIMI’s future remains entangled in litigation, and its controversial role in shaping public discourse continues unabated.
A federal judge has no standing on how the DOJ runs the State Dept.
If we had these same judges in the Civil War, there would still be slavery.
Of course . . .
Too much irony to even comprehend. All pretending on the left has run its course. They are just full on tyrants of their own twisted virtue.
How does a Judge in California a proper venue for an administrative action. If a federal agency?!? For better or worse, it is the DC Circuit that has jurisdiction and venue over this.
Move the office to northern Minnesota.
Ignore and proceed.
In case you haven't noticed, it's back on with slavery.
Susan Yvonne Illston (born June 24, 1948) is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. She was nominated by President Bill Clinton and confirmed by the Senate in 1995. She assumed senior status in 2013.
+1 Nailed it.
A Trump judge. In other words a deep state judge who recommended to Trump.
Or one of the Aleutian Islands.
>>US District Judge Susan Illston
Recommended by both Boxer AND Feinstein, appointed by Clinton.
She should never have been a judge to begin with.
Parties have standing. Courts have jurisdiction
I think there are some Federal judges who need to be dismantled.
Nah. Point Barrow, AK.
Just ignore it.
imo
She has no right to do this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.