Posted on 05/30/2025 10:50:34 AM PDT by Red Badger
In case you were wondering what the Wisconsin Democratic Party is focused on these days — it's not inflation, the border crisis, or crumbling roads. Nope.
Their latest priority is scrubbing the word "mother" from state law.
This week, Democrats introduced the Marriage and Family Equality Act — a warm, fuzzy name for a bill that replaces "mother" with terms like "pregnant person."
Apparently, acknowledging basic biology is now considered hAtE speech. Sorry, moms.
It gets worse. Similarly, Governor Tony Evers' Senate Bill 45 doesn't just tweak a few terms — it replaces "mother" with "inseminated person" across 1,917 pages of government legalese. Earlier this year, Evers introduced a budget proposal that used the same language, which Not the Bee reported on at the time.
The backlash hasn't dissuaded the Dems from changing course. They're plowing full steam ahead, all for the low, low price of $55 million in taxpayer funds.
Welcome to egalitarian Marxism.
It looks like Wisconsin isn't the only state captured by this nonsense…
Meanwhile, Trump signed an executive order to protect women's sports from biological men — because leadership actually means standing up for common sense, not pretending the existence of women is offensive.
Therefore, it is the policy of the United States to rescind all funds from educational programs that deprive women and girls of fair athletic opportunities, which results in the endangerment, humiliation, and silencing of women and girls and deprives them of privacy. It shall also be the policy of the United States to oppose male competitive participation in women's sports more broadly, as a matter of safety, fairness, dignity, and truth.
What actual leadership looks like. 👆
“People are happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they can’t get. They’re well off; they’re safe; they’re never ill; they’re not afraid of death; they’re blissfully ignorant of passion and old age; they’re plagued with no mothers or fathers; they’ve got no wives, or children, or lovers to feel strongly about; they’re so conditioned that they practically can’t help behaving as they ought to behave. And if anything should go wrong, there’s soma. Which you go and chuck out of the window in the name of liberty, Mr. Savage. Liberty!” He laughed. “Expecting Deltas to know what liberty is! And now expecting them to understand Othello! My good boy!” ― Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
“And home was as squalid psychically as physically. Psychically, it was a rabbit hole, a midden, hot with the frictions of tightly packed life, reeking with emotion. What suffocating intimacies, what dangerous, insane, obscene relationships between the members of the family group! Maniacally, the mother brooded over her children (her children) … brooded over them like a cat over its kittens; but a cat that could talk, a cat that could say, “My baby, my baby,” over and over again. “My baby, and oh, oh, at my breast, the little hands, the hunger, and that unspeakable agonizing pleasure! Till at last my baby sleeps, my baby sleeps with a bubble of white milk at the corner of his mouth. My little baby sleeps …”
“Yes,” said Mustapha Mond, nodding his head, “you may well shudder.”
― Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
A mother is an inseminated person. Ok then.
I’m trying to understand how the word mother is offensive.
I will go to re-education camp...
“inseminated“
It takes a MAN to make semen. Let’s see them get rid of that word. Ideas?
In the Huxley novel “Brave New World”, terms like ‘mother’, ‘father, ‘brother’ and ‘sister’ were considered obscenities and were not to be uttered in polite society.
We were warned........................
It has been done................
“In the Huxley novel “Brave New World”, terms like ‘mother’, ‘father, ‘brother’ and ‘sister’ were considered obscenities and were not to be uttered in polite society.”
I remember thinking that it seemed like an implausible plot point that the word ‘mother’ came to be considered as a very negative term or even an obscenity within that society. Yet here we are, and how wrong I was.
And we aren’t supposed to say “pregnant women”. We are supposed to say “pregnant people”, because the liberal view , is that there could be some Trans whatever who doesn’t identify as a woman, yet is pregnant.
And we are supposed to avoid offending the sensibilities of such Trans , who does not think she’s a woman but is pregnant.
We should adopt the rules of the “thoroughbred Horse Racing’s industry.
The horse must be bred by a stallion mounting a mare the old fashion way.
Both must be thoroughbred, no artificial insemination!
Maybe they should change the name of Democrats to Demoncrats to better reveal what their true belief system really is.
Any definition of mother shouldn’t be so broad to in include every person to ever give a “bj”!, i,e, “inseminated person” !
I wished my wife a happy Inseminated Person day on Mother’s Day. She was not amused.
I wonder if she will get me anything for Inseminating Person Day next month?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.