Skip to comments.
The Sacred Undergarment That Has Mormon Women Buzzing
The New York Times ^
| May 29, 2025, 5:01 a.m. ET
| Lauren Jackson
Posted on 05/29/2025 11:34:22 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
“I want them now. I will get them at all costs,” said one influencer based in Hawaii.
Some Mormon women are obsessed with something illicit. They’re phoning friends, calling in favors and paying for international shipping to get it: a sacred tank top.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has redesigned its temple garments, which are worn by faithful members under their clothes. The garments are effectively underwear that until recently, looked like white short-sleeve shirts and knee-length shorts. Now, the church has removed the sleeve on some designs, turning them into tank tops.
The church is releasing the tops to its more than 17 million members around the world in phases. Last October, it quietly announced that the new garments would first be available to members in “hot, humid” climates like those in Africa and Asia.
They aren’t sanctioned for wear in the United States yet, but that hasn’t stopped American influencers from sourcing them — and showing them off
in recent videos online.
“I was like: I want them now. I will get them at all costs. I will fly to Japan if I need to,
” said Andrea Fausett, a 31-year-old influencer based in Hawaii. She secured a few tops from a friend in Asia. Other women told The New York Times that they had asked friends or family in Thailand and the Philippines to mail them.
Kim Austin, a 33-year-old consultant living in Provo, Utah, said that she wore the new garments under a sleeveless dress to church, and that women in her congregation asked how they could get them. “Utah women will stop at nothing,” she said. Alyssa and McKenna Banks, sisters who run...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
A sleeveless top? How risque! What a scandal!
2
posted on
05/29/2025 11:38:46 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Psalms 118:24)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Actually it won’t be a scandal until they turn the “knee-length shorts” into booty shorts.
3
posted on
05/29/2025 11:40:08 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Psalms 118:24)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why can’t they go to BrighamYoungsSecret.com and get them online?
/s /s /s
4
posted on
05/29/2025 11:41:04 AM PDT
by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: HombreSecreto
5
posted on
05/29/2025 11:43:13 AM PDT
by
dayglored
(This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Psalms 118:24)
To: HombreSecreto
6
posted on
05/29/2025 11:44:10 AM PDT
by
Tell It Right
(1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The famous “magic underwear”. I thought it was just an urban legend.
CC
7
posted on
05/29/2025 11:45:46 AM PDT
by
Celtic Conservative
(Pedisequus parasiticus es popularium!)
To: HombreSecreto
I have an idea; how about cutting the sleeves off one which has them, any seamstress worth her name could be doing it easily unless such a garment needs a special blessing or endorsement? Just asking for a friend.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
And to think that they call Hellenism “Greek Mythology.”
9
posted on
05/29/2025 11:47:38 AM PDT
by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis! Trump & Vance, 2024! (Formerly) Goldwater & Thomas Sowell.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
10
posted on
05/29/2025 12:03:22 PM PDT
by
Fido969
To: E. Pluribus Unum
But they aren’t a cult... just have to have that sacred underwear...
11
posted on
05/29/2025 12:05:02 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Screw the ChiComms! America first!)
To: vpintheak
“Cult” ==> “Any religion the speaker wishes to disparage.”
12
posted on
05/29/2025 12:06:44 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: HombreSecreto
>>Why can’t they go to BrighamYoungsSecret.com and get them online?
BrighamYoungsSecret only carries children’s sizes.
13
posted on
05/29/2025 12:07:53 PM PDT
by
vikingd00d
(chown -R us ~you/base)
To: NorthMountain
Do you plan on becoming a god when you die?
14
posted on
05/29/2025 12:13:46 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: ansel12
Irrelevant, and my religious affiliation is no secret on this forum. You can answer your own question.
My assessment of the practical meaning of “cult” in American popular English remains. In practice, it’s just another four-letter word for “something [I] don’t like”.
15
posted on
05/29/2025 12:17:11 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: NorthMountain
I don’t know your faith or if you belong to a cult, that’s why I asked the question.
16
posted on
05/29/2025 12:19:58 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
To: NorthMountain
17
posted on
05/29/2025 12:20:06 PM PDT
by
MotorCityBuck
(Keep the change, you are filthy animal !!)
To: ansel12
List all the religions that you dislike. Since “cult”, in practical use, has no objective meaning, I cannot help you with that. Or you could use the search feature of this forum and see which religious “caucus” I occasionally post in.
As for your original question ... as I said, it’s irrelevant to my contention that “cult” is just another meaningless four-letter word.
18
posted on
05/29/2025 12:24:49 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: NorthMountain
My assessment of the practical meaning of “cult” in American popular English remains. In practice, it’s just another four-letter word for “something [I] don’t like”. I don't like asparagus and will proudly claim myself not a member of that cult.
19
posted on
05/29/2025 12:27:45 PM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
To: NorthMountain
I guess it was a hard question.
20
posted on
05/29/2025 12:28:28 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson