Posted on 05/25/2025 12:06:52 PM PDT by george76
Activists make very bad judges
This is so similar to the time in the 1860s when the country was divided and the courts were doing harm.
SCOTUS has to do this right (don’t hold your breath for the House and Senate to do their sworn duty on our behalf-—too much courage required for them) or there will be terrible consequences.
Amazes me that Kavanaugh, after being kept up at night by bullhorns of woke protesters and threats to his life and his family’s, would somehow be just as wimpy now as before.
Checks and Balances means that the courts also must be checked.
Never trust hyphenated humans, especially one who does not know what a human woman is.
Three co-equal branches of government.
Or, you can have little unelected judges just control everything and overrule anyone who stands in their way.
Right before the civil war then, and right before the coming civil war now.
Doesn’t help that too many of these activist judges weren’t even BORN in these United States of America and have no real ties to the American concept of “Truth, Justice and the American Way” but are more steeped in the political “black robes justice” of the turd world countries from which they excame.
True.
Even the biased Harvard Gazette ran a story on lawyers (who later we know become the judges).
“Among graduates of those top programs, among those who’ve made a contribution, 76 percent have given more money to Democrats than to Republicans.”
Said most colleges leaned Dem since the 1960s and students of Dem leaning colleges later enroll in law schools.
“...in the United States today, it seems like a really important point in people’s lives is their early 20s. People who might become lawyers, they’ve just graduated from college and they’re trying to think about what career interest they might want to pursue, and one possible thing that could influence their decision about which career to pursue is their own personal politics.”
From Gauging the Bias of Lawyers.
harvard.edu/gazette
Don't hold her to that opinion. She'll be a team player.
Good, but what is the fourth branch of government above the SCOTUS?
Maybe this?
Answer to a Higher Authority.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvsthRP1pjs
Congress should remove executive orders review from all courts but the SC.
>Right before the civil war then, and right before the coming civil war now
Absolutely,time will tell what means will be needed to put an end to this judicial tyranny. Probably firepower if it comes to that, that’s what it’s for after all, not deer hunting. Although I do like venison.
Sick joke.
At the end of an interview with legal insurrection last week, there’s a point that was very interesting. “If the ignorance of Roberts Scotus continues, one day there will be a Republican preaidential candidate that run on the platform of arresting the Scotus, and he might win!”
Again the Supreme Court is asked to do Congress’s job. The constitution gives total control of the lower court to Congress. They should already have passed legislation prohibiting universal injunctions. Instead they try to sluff it off on SCOTUS.
Turley dips his toe in the pond.
Females in particular.
You can see the dichotomy with Kagan.
When a judge rules outside their scope they should be immediately stripped of a duty and compensation, and should also be investigated.
Foreign-born activist judges make us unsafe...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.