Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Biden’s Dept of Justice – Merrick Garland was AG In Name Only for a Specific Reason
The Last Refuge ^ | 5/17/2025 | Sundance

Posted on 05/18/2025 10:46:33 PM PDT by ma_che62

Merrick Garland was not selected to be Joe Biden’s Attorney General because the crew in control of the events wanted Merrick Garland as Attorney General. Garland was removed from his position as DC Circuit Court Justice in order to make room for Ketanji Brown-Jackson to take Garland’s place, get Senate confirmed and then await the resignation of Supreme Court Justice Stephen Bryer.

As a standalone Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown-Jackson would have been a radical pick. Judge Brown-Jackson was a known activist in the DC District Court; however, by removing Garland as chief circuit justice and replacing him with KBJ, who needed Senate confirmation as chief circuit justice, she could get through a later Senate confirmation easier and then sit on the Supreme Court for thirty years. Garland was removed to make room for KBJ. It was a strategy.

Garland was a U.S. Attorney General in name only. The actual lead of the DOJ was from Obama’s crew, Deputy AG Lisa Monaco.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: biden; corruption; cth; dei; doj; donion; garland; itsthemarxismstupid; judgewatch; ketanjibrownjackson; lawfare; lisamonaco; merrickgarland; obama; scotus; sundance
Corruption and evil without end...
1 posted on 05/18/2025 10:46:33 PM PDT by ma_che62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ma_che62

Heinrich Garland is pure evil


2 posted on 05/18/2025 10:51:53 PM PDT by digger48 (Mp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ma_che62

Sundance is wrong on this one. It just worked out that way.


3 posted on 05/18/2025 11:38:25 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ma_che62

Sounds plausible to me!


4 posted on 05/19/2025 12:32:11 AM PDT by quilterdebbie (We will endeavor to persevere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ma_che62

.


5 posted on 05/19/2025 2:48:37 AM PDT by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

“Sundance is wrong on this one. It just worked out that way.”

Oh, I have no trouble believing that Obama was pulling the strings at the Justice Department through Monaco.


6 posted on 05/19/2025 3:04:18 AM PDT by I-ambush (From the brightest star comes the blackest hole. You had so much to offer, why didya offer your sou?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

That is some coincidence.


7 posted on 05/19/2025 3:58:03 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: I-ambush

“ Oh, I have no trouble believing that Obama was pulling the strings at the Justice Department through Monaco.”

The larger question is who was and still is “guiding” Obama. Obama has never given any hint that he is capable of strategic thinking at such a level.


8 posted on 05/19/2025 4:10:47 AM PDT by Rlsau1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ma_che62

This explains a lot of Garland’s actions and lack of actions. Thank God he never made it to the USSC.


9 posted on 05/19/2025 4:20:27 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox

So many sociopaths. So little time.


10 posted on 05/19/2025 6:21:29 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ma_che62

Plausible, but is it factual; circumstantial consequences are not evidence, they are mostly assumptions.


11 posted on 05/19/2025 7:08:00 AM PDT by Wuli (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ma_che62

Garland was the biggest loser at every level, which is nice.


12 posted on 05/19/2025 7:09:57 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I-ambush
I was more referring to the whole Garland thing. They did not predict the Mitch move.
13 posted on 05/19/2025 8:01:16 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
I would tend to agree with you.

They were rewarding Garland for losing the SCOTUS nomination in a way that was payback for Republicans.

Brown's nomination to SCOTUS was coincidental.

-PJ

14 posted on 05/19/2025 8:32:47 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson