Posted on 05/15/2025 5:37:47 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Arena,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship was “a loser.”
Host Kasie Hunt said, “I want to start with what the Supreme Court discussed here today. They seemed open to limiting the ability of district court judges to issue nationwide injunctions. Do you think there’s potential validity to that?”
Raskin said, “Not really. It would mean, for example in this case on birthright citizenship, that every family in America that might be affected or every person who might be affected would have to go themselves to court to sue. That’s enormously inefficient and really unmanageable. and it doesn’t make any sense. it would be like saying, if, you know, the schools were discriminating today, that it wouldn’t be enough to get one case going up to the Supreme Court on school segregation everybody who is being discriminated against would have to go in their own district. So I don’t see the logic of that.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Raskin is the LOSER
Yep.
At least none of Trump’s children have committed suicide Jamie.
I think the reason that the Supreme Court is using this issue when it really should simply be about nationwide injunction by one District Court judge is because it is a loser for Trump. These should be totally separate cases.
If retards had their own country, Raskin would be king.
Typical Dem tactic. If he’s speaking out against it he’s the one concerned with losing.
Just like the tariffs, right Raskin?
Agree. They are trying to kill 2 birds with one stone, wrongly, to neutralize Trump. Cowards.
Jamie is already on the helicopter list.
If that were the case, Ratskin would be urging President Trump on.
Projection.
Raskin is an expert in being a looser.
Yes, IT TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE! Raskin in another loser from Maryland.
Maryland is the Loser State. Just think of all of mega-idiots that state has produced. These must be something in the water.
Yes. Raskin is the one with a big “L” tattooed on his forehead.
If Maryland did not have federal money pouring into it due to its many Federal, employees, corporate headquarters, and lobbyists due to their proximity to Washington DC, it would be a very poor state. The government in Maryland is very anti-private enterprise especially small business.
That’s a very incorrect assumption- if Maryland didn’t have all of those things that you’ve correctly mentioned- it wouldn’t have the government that it does.
Maybe, but no one can change its location
Says raskin...a verifiable loser.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.