Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America, the Juristocracy
American Thinker ^ | May 15, 2025 | Peggy Ryan

Posted on 05/15/2025 3:30:58 PM PDT by Kenny

The list is growing of judges who moonlight as the President of the United States. These ‘judges’ have reversed executive orders, prevented the firing of federal employees, even ordered deported gang members returned to the United States.

No one should be surprised at this judicial insurgency. For decades Democrats have “judge shopped” to get their case before a “friendly” judge. The openly corrupt part of this tactic is having ‘friendly’ not impartial judges. But the crazy stuff eventually got overturned and the system worked. So how did we get to this place where the system no longer works?

Well for anyone who didn’t notice, there was a silent coup in 2020. A pandemic and the resulting tsunami of mail-in ballots were used to illegally remove a sitting President.

So President Trump was out, the Biden regime in. But unlike Brazil where courts banned President Bolsonaro from running for office in upcoming elections, the Biden regime lacked the legal muscle to keep Trump from running in 2024. Which is why Biden stacked the courts with his judges durning his occupation. As Chuck Schumer bragged, Biden confirmed 235 judges. And he added, "they are ruling against Trump, time after time after time”.

. . . And it’s not just district judges. SCOTUS joined the insurgency with their recent decision to block President Trump’s deportations.

In his dissent, Justice Alito slammed the majority saying they lacked jurisdiction “given that the case is still being litigated in lower courts”. He excoriated the majority saying, the court “acted literally in the middle of the night, without full information or proper process, based solely on applicants submission with no response from government.” .

Translation, SCOTUS Issued this decision not based on jurisdiction, evidence, or process to sanction the judiciary overriding the executive branch though clearly unconstitutional.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: interference; judgewatch; juristocracy; kritocracy; lawfare
“As the courts are generally the last in making the decision, it results to them, by refusing or not refusing to execute a law, to stamp it with its final character. This makes the Judiciary department paramount in fact to the Legislature, which was never intended, and can never be proper.” — James Madison
1 posted on 05/15/2025 3:30:58 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Yes. We have a Constitutional Crisis, and it isn’t Article II.


2 posted on 05/15/2025 3:33:04 PM PDT by griswold3 (Truth Beauty and Goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

When in the course of human events


3 posted on 05/15/2025 3:37:16 PM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

And useless Republicans will do nothing.

I hate to say it, but it’s over.

Poor Trump is alone.

Our constitutional republic is dead.


4 posted on 05/15/2025 3:38:47 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
No one should be surprised at this judicial insurgency.
For decades Democrats have “judge shopped” to get their case before a “friendly” judge. The openly corrupt part of this tactic is having ‘friendly’ not impartial judges.

Didn't think the Constitutional crisis would come from the Judiciary - but here it is...

5 posted on 05/15/2025 3:41:03 PM PDT by GOPJ (Judicial robes aren't invisibility cloaks that allows judges to engage in criminal acts. J Turley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

The three branches are supposed to check each other.

Nowhere is it written that the courts are supreme and judges free from prejudice and political bias, but that’s how they are being treated.

People complain, rightly or wrongly, about corruption or self-interested behavior from Congress and the executive.

But the judiciary is now to be followed as if they had the authority the Pope does over the Catholic Church.


6 posted on 05/15/2025 3:43:32 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
America, the Juristocracy

I'm going to check Walmart, they may have a Judge that I could buy at a price that I can afford.

7 posted on 05/15/2025 3:44:46 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (President Trump Decisively Won Popular & E.C., Celebrate Recivilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Bkmk


8 posted on 05/15/2025 4:52:06 PM PDT by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

What if a dem president eo’s an end to guns?

Could a court be stopped in setting such aside?


9 posted on 05/15/2025 5:35:00 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Trump failure: Not declaring Antifa a terrorist organization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

Shove your ignorant Anti-Catholic Bigotry.


10 posted on 05/15/2025 6:01:58 PM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Does the Pope not have more or less complete authority over the Catholic Church?

L


11 posted on 05/15/2025 6:04:56 PM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

That’s not to be anti-Catholic. He’s the spiritual leader of the church.

I was in no way equating him with some power hungry district judge who people are now putting on a pedestal.

Quite the opposite. I was saying people are giving the judiciary a pass treating them as if they had the authority of the pope.


12 posted on 05/15/2025 6:23:45 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
What if a dem president eo’s an end to guns?

Could a court be stopped in setting such aside?

That's the point of this article.

"“Constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States is not explicitly stated in the Constitution but is firmly established through historical precedent”.

So we're using a court's opinion (precedent) to override the Constitution. But I have no idea how to fix it.

13 posted on 05/15/2025 7:21:04 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
we're using a court's opinion (precedent) to override the Constitution. But I have no idea how to fix it.

\

Article V

Convention of the States

( the founders were Geniuses )

14 posted on 05/16/2025 6:23:46 AM PDT by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson