Posted on 03/30/2025 5:29:23 PM PDT by TheRef
“No one should be fired, at least in the short term, over the Atlantic article. To do so would only embolden the Dems to go after additional scalps. Say what you want about the Democrats, but they have always circled the wagons and protected their own for transgressions far greater than this. It’s time we took a page from their playbook and protected our people as well.”
I agree.
I’m not a fan of Mike Waltz but Republicans need to stop falling for the divide and conquer strategy of the left.
The only part of any of this that poses a danger to Waltz is the stuff about expressing views inconsistent with Trump’s positions. That is absolutely not allowed.
If Trump’s views are not palatable to Waltz, the correct response is to resign. Not hang around and undercut him.
Do note, the only effective and timely manner of finding all the leakers and leaky crap is to let these non issue items that “sound” good to commies and libtards drop and connect the dots...
Man
The anti trumpers bite at each cut bait mullet chunk on a hook in front of their noses don’t they?
“Shucks WSJ said it that’s why wardaddy “
I said last week he looked like a plant. A double agent. Agent provocateur.
Why else would he have Goldberg’s number in his contacts?
I would have fired him immediately..................
I still believe it was his CCP staffer, Wong, who added the contact to Waltz’s contact list and/or the call itself.
Something about all this stinks. If I were Goldberg, I would have hung on to this story, (would still do damage at a later date) and I would have waited to see if something more juicy came in another chat. If he could have got intel on Z negotiations, or DOGE, or a series of topics, that would have been devastating. Not to mention, he could have dropped just a few tidbits in DC about the strike and had team Trump at each other’s throats wondering who the mole was and no one trusting each other. Maybe he just hates Trump that much, or he wanted to hurry and get credit for it. I don’t know, but to me it seems something is strange.
Is it because he’s a traitorous backstabbing snake? Trump was warned against hiring this neo-con snake.
Don’t know enough about him to render a decent opinion so I’ll have to take your word. But why would he “out” himself so plainly? doesn’t make sense to me.
Pqrt of coordinated Dem fight back. Right now they’re coordinating against Musk, Hegseth, waltz and other. Somebody anybody’s head.
Vance was discussing in the Signal chat as well... he is just as responsible as any others who were chatting there. The whole administration caught in a major (but typical) Washington leak...
This time its blatant incompetence that has to be blamed. It’s truly crazy stuff.
Thank God, Trump wasn’t in the chat!!
WSJ is never Trump. Not trustworthy.
You and me, both.
He is a liar and needs to go.
BKMRK.
Elon has his own press outlet, X, that she has no control over.
How do you propose she handle X?
Has this been “fact-checked”?
Im not trusting him one bit
It would be like Hegseth having Leon Panetta’s number on his phone
>> Even considering the source, one is inclined to believe this.
“One” is inclined to believe it? Is that “one” you, or are you trying to make that every”one”?
Because I, for “one”, don’t believe it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.