Posted on 03/29/2025 1:09:06 PM PDT by hardspunned
There is a lot of speculation about the potential for President Trump to remove National Security Advisor Mike Waltz following the SignalGate fiasco. However, I doubt it will come soon.
Yes, CTH predicted in January that Waltz would be the first to get fired; but that prediction was due to the easily identified conflict between Waltz’s ideological mindset and his responsibility to execute a President Trump national security policy that is seemingly counter to Waltz’s worldview.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Even given the benefit of the doubt, someone as boneheaded and careless as Waltz is a liability.
We are only lucky we learned about this arse clown so early. Some stakes are so high that any
error is fatal.
Even given the benefit of the doubt, someone as boneheaded and careless as Waltz is a liability.
We are only lucky we learned about this arse clown so early. Some stakes are so high that any
error is fatal.
Don’t know too much about him except his bio which is impressive. I don’t see Trump firing him this soon but we’ll see.
Once he gets back to USA, fire him.
He appears to be a mole to me.
My mother always told me you’re judged by the company you keep.
“I’ll shed no tears if he’s gone. Next to Blondi, Trump’s worst major pick.”
I’ll give ‘Blondi’ a bit more time, but Waltz is PATHETIC, and the BEST THING that Trump could do now is dump him, since the REAL PURPOSE of this crap was to take out Hegseth, and so dumping Waltz would show the Deep State that Trump is on to them and will make them pay, BIG TIME, by having their best agent be tossed to the gutter.
IMHO it’s either Waltz or one of his lackeys that ran an op trying to get a scalp. Whoever added the reporter is the mole, hoping that Gabbard, Ratcliff, or Hegseth would put something out in the signal chat that they could hang them with. No way no how does one J Goldberg of all people get added to this group chat without it being a deep state op.
Gabbbard is cabinet-level and participates in those meetings. Waltz is an advisor to the President and works more closely with the Oval Office. If we're going to see an offloading of responsiblity from Waltz, wouldn't that correspond with an increasing presence of Gabbard on the national security front?
-PJ
Once the RATS get one notch on their gun, they won’t stop.
“No way no how does one J Goldberg of all people get added to this group chat without it being a deep state op”
Yep. I’m astounded that they didn’t examine everybody on the signal messaging thread.
I never understood the Waltz pick. He’s as unimpressive, and untrustworthy, as every other jackass I’ve seen on the national political scene who has spent his entire life working for government.
I’m still not sure what it is that Waltz did wrong. Too many people are swallowing the whole Signal hoax whole, in my opinion.
have we learned how this pond scum journalist was invited to the meeting?
Agree. And the usual suspects. They know more than the President obviously.
So much they hide behind a keyboard and flatulate.
Waltz would not be “a notch on their gun” they want Watz right where he is. It is no mystery why they called for Pete’s scalp not Waltz’s.
Exactly right. Too many unbelievable excuses akin to "the dog ate my homework". Yeah, right.
Yes, his face & name were all over the internets yesterday. They know who did it.
Trust the Plan!
WWG1WGA!
6-D Chess!
Trust Sessions!
Q-Drop!
On the other hand, there's Occam's razor.
The only ones who keep posting and Flatulating Re-publicly about this story are those who want to hurt Trump and his Cabinet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.