Posted on 03/27/2025 2:47:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails until after the 2016 election
He’s also now “coincidentally” presiding over the Signal case
This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...

If it weren't for the antics of Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin, we might remember this judge for swinging the 2016 election.
When can you convince U.S. District Judge James Boasberg to defer to the judgment of the current administration? When it benefits a Democrat, of course.
Boasberg, as you might know, is the Obama-appointed judge who’s attempted to block President Donald Trump’s fast-track deportation of members of the Venezuelan transnational gang Tren de Aragua.
The move came as the individuals were on flights to El Salvador from where they were being detained in Texas. The judge ordered the flights to turn around, which the government argued he had no jurisdiction over as they’d already left U.S. airspace.
In the meantime, the Trump administration has announced its intention to continue deportations under the Alien Enemies Act until the Supreme Court weighs in as the final arbiter and has questioned whether Boasberg has jurisdiction over the case in the first place.
(How does a district judge based in the District of Columbia have a say over immigrants being detained in Texas that are being deported to El Salvador? When the American Civil Liberties Union venue shops, of course.)
However, if you want to see Boasberg deferring to the administration over their interpretation of the law, one need only look back to the administration which appointed him.
In September 2016, with Hillary Clinton’s email server scandal still being quite the to-do and Clinton being the Democratic candidate for president, Boasberg ruled that most of those emails wouldn’t be released to the public until after the election, despite conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch filing numerous lawsuits seeking to make the documents public under federal disclosure laws.
From The Wall Street Journal, Sept. 23, 2016: “Most of Hillary Clinton’s emails recovered during a Federal Bureau of Investigation probe into practices from her time as secretary of state won’t be made public until after Election Day, according to a new timetable set Friday by a federal judge.
Uh, Roberts needs to grow a spine and squash this nonsense if he wants to save the reputation of the Judicial branch.
judgewatch ping to you
He’s the one doing the rigging.
Can we get a legal DOGE Team ? Because, it is beyond obvious, the cahoots run very deep.
ping to John “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges” Roberts
You might wanna take some notes here, Johnny.
I always thought “Beds Are Burning” was a catchy tune even though the lyrics were preachy, but I never realized Boasberg went on to study law after Midnight Oil broke up.
Just the appearance of being compromised warrants investigation.
That would be real ‘checks and balances’.
they all represent Yale, Malta, and Epstein Island,
and hate the US Constitution and the elected President.
... and this just shows that they, and their
wives who run their satellites and “assignments”
for further income, always have.
Read this and weep.
https://thinglabs.io/heres-why-elon-musk-is-blocking-links-to-the-signal-app-on-x
Elon knows. Signal is one big fat corrupt leak.
Activists make very bad and very corrupt judges
He even looks like the melting Nazi in the Raiders of the Lost Ark. He’s a damn RAT shill. He’s no judge. He’s a RAT weapon.
Uh, Roberts needs to grow a spine and squash this nonsense if he wants to save the reputation of the Judicial branch.”
The list of conflicts and improprieties with this treasonous prick just keeps getting longer and longer. We are way past the point where Roberts should have stepped in. It is obvious that he has no intention of doing so. He has no concern that this will impact the reputation of the Judicial branch because MSM is its shield
What ‘case’? Brought forth by whom?
Are judges prosecutors now? Is this a trial? For what? Somebody accidentally added to some texts?
At worst it’s just egg-on-face for the Executive - but their discretion as to whether they have a problem with it or not. How is this for a judge to act on?
Okay Elon. Now do who added JG to the meeting list.
I think Johnson needs to grow a spine and dissolve his court.
DC needs to be managed by the House. It is not a State. I don’t expect the trough-sucking Congress-critters to take on the work, though.
People do see it. And they are tired of it. BTW, the Special election in Florida is the reason for all of this ‘extra’ bs by the Democrats. (Walz’s old Rep seat is having a special election).
‘Checks and balances’ means that the courts must be checked and balanced.
Uh, Roberts needs to grow a spine and squash this nonsense if he wants to save the reputation of the Judicial branch.”
The list of conflicts and improprieties with this treasonous prick just keeps getting longer and longer. We are way past the point where Roberts should have stepped in. It is obvious that he has no intention of doing so. He has no concern that this will impact the reputation of the Judicial branch because MSM is its shield
\/
where is USSC Roberts ? ,
the World Wonders.
( thats the legacy you’re looking at johny, AWOL )
What ‘case’? Brought forth by whom?
Chioma Chukwu, interim executive director of American Oversight
You’ll see a similarity between this one and the ones in NY and Fani
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.