Posted on 03/26/2025 8:51:48 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
The people’s deference to the judiciary is not unlimited. The courts can weaken their moral authority quickly with over-reaching rulings, particularly when those rulings reek of personal animus toward one man — i.e., “Trump Derangement Syndrome” — rather than rational decision-making. The so-called “resistance” will play well to the “elites” but not to the people who put the president into office to do the very things that are being resisted.
Americans intuitively understand that the judiciary’s primary role is to protect the rights of American citizens, not the “rights” of federal bureaucracies and foreign interests. They also understand that the president’s core functions include managing the executive branch and protecting Americans from foreign threats. They do not need to reread the Constitution with every dispute to remain convinced of these things.
Americans will tolerate some level of Ivy-League-trained manipulation at the margins of constitutional interpretation. However, they are not likely to support judicial micromanagement of personnel- and budget-cutting decisions for an organization that is $36 trillion in debt. They will not support judicial meddling in the military, foreign aid, or other foreign affairs. And they certainly will not support a federal judiciary hell-bent on favoring the interests of foreign threats — such as illegal alien law-breakers and Tren de Aragua gang members — at the expense of Americans.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
One can only hope.
Alternatively, a better approach would be to have the House defund all levels of district Judges. And then pass a bill forcing district Judges to only adjudicate local areas. Since the Constitution prevents changing their salaries to $100 a month.. Maybe then they will get the word!
Most of the rulings are based on statutes, which Congress has the authority to change. Congress has the authority to do many of the things Trump wants to do.
The supreme court will eventually rule in Trumps favor in “most” of these cases, and in the process restore the courts reputation. But the damage will have already been done by that point in delaying Trumps agenda.
The case Trump is most likely to lose is birthright citizenship IMO
Circumstances don’t make a man, they reveal him.
——quoted often by Dr. Wayne W. Dyer.
The rotten core of bias and leftist hatred of America in the judges is being revealed daily.
In Iran the black robed tyrants are called Mullahs.
In America they have another name.
Well put.
It needs destroying.
> Most of the rulings are based on statutes, which Congress has the authority to change. <
Yep. But I’m quite sure Democrats in the Senate will filibuster any attempt to bring balance to this situation.
So either Trump will back down in the face of these rogue judges (not likely) or we’re in for a constitutional crisis.
I don’t know if even the Supreme Court can help. Because if they strike down some rogue judge orders, other rogue judges will just issue new orders.
What’s the big difference between the Judicial Branch and a Clown Show?
The clowns are professionals.
“The supreme court will eventually rule in Trumps favor..”
I think a larger question is being raised here:
In a system of co-equal branches, does the Supreme Court get to have the last word on the question of judicial over-reach?
Just as well. Shovel ‘em all out like manure and replace ‘em.
until and unless the congress passes a law that a president signs that says otherwise, yes.
If they cannot be IMPARTIAL or follow constitution FIRE them or charge them w TREASON and like Rep Crockett SAYS TAKE THEM DOWN
Judicial Tyranny must be destroyed at the roots.
All part of the plan to one-party,total control of one's life by a global government
It’s up to Congress. Don’t hold your breath.
> Circumstances don’t make a man, they reveal him.
——quoted often by Dr. Wayne W. Dyer.<
Profound!!!
Trump may be allowing these short delays to expose the beast, create public backlash, and to rein in these district court justices to only deciding cases for their district. A Texas state judge can’t level an injunction that enjoins a California statute.
EC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.