Posted on 03/25/2025 12:39:00 PM PDT by DFG
The most liberal circuit court in the country delivered a surprise victory to the Trump Administration today.
As Politico reported, a three judge panel for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals blocked an order by a district court judge in Seattle that would have forced the Trump Administration to restart refugee admissions. Trump can now continue with his pause on all new refugee admissions.
Politico notes that the administration must still process refugees approved before January 20. The ruling notes that Trump’s executive order had nothing to do with those refugees.
Bill Clinton and Joe Biden appointed two of the judges, Barry Silverman and Ana De Alba. The other judge, Bridget Bade, was appointed President Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Maybe the courts are beginning to realize they exist at the pleasure of Congress and they can’t make 100% of their rulings against Trump, lest Speaker Johnson lower the hammer on them.
Praise. The. LORD!
Wow... I am so relieved to know that even leftie judges occasionally have flashes of sanity and honesty.
The 9th circuit USED to be liberal.
The current laws regarding “asylum” and “refugees” need to be junked entirely.
It shuts down the influx of illegal aliens into the country and allows Trump to secure the borders
Dealing with those already in the country is going to have to work its way through the courts where Trump Admin will eventually prevail
As a practical matter, the Trump Admin is going to have its hands full and be task saturated removing the million or so criminal illegal aliens , terrorists, sleeper agents, cartel members and other undesirable illegals so its going to take a while to get to the garden variety fraudulent asylum seekers
There is nothing the courts can do about defunding the Biden illegal alien money laundering schemes
If the Ninth Circuit hears the appeal en banc, no way they will rule for the government.
A commie court did this wow let me go see if any pigs are flying
Winning.
Now if we can just get an overturn by the DC Appeals Court of the Trump-Boasberg case.
I’m shocked.
Pacito v. Trump (2:25-cv-00255)
District Court, W.D. Washington
Yes. I remember back them Michael Savage calling them the 9th Jerkit Whores and Schlemeils
Wonderful!!!
When will they be locking up Boaburger and his daughter?
Petition for Rehearing by the Panel: A party may request the same three-judge panel to reconsider its decision.
Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Alternatively, or additionally, a party can petition for a rehearing en banc. Unlike other circuits where all active judges participate in en banc hearings, the Ninth Circuit employs a "limited en banc" procedure due to its large size. This involves the Chief Judge and ten randomly selected active judges, totaling eleven judges.
So yes, they can petition for an en banc hearing.
Well that’s some good news in a sea of, lately, bad news involving the courts.
Mount up Tom Homan a.k.a. Kemo Sabe!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.