SURPRISE: Liberal 9th Circuit Court OVERTURNS Biden Judge Ruling Requiring Trump Administration to Continue Accepting New and Potentially Dangerous Refugees

Gateway Pundit ^ | 03/25/2025 | Cullen Linebarger

[DFG]

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Maybe the courts are beginning to realize they exist at the pleasure of Congress and they can’t make 100% of their rulings against Trump, lest Speaker Johnson lower the hammer on them.

[Flaming Conservative]

Praise. The. LORD!

[Impala64ssa]

Barry Silverman and Ana De Alba
Do these judges live in a "sanctuary city"? Asking for a friend....

[A_perfect_lady]

Wow... I am so relieved to know that even leftie judges occasionally have flashes of sanity and honesty.

[DIRTYSECRET]

The 9th circuit USED to be liberal.

[BenLurkin]

The current laws regarding “asylum” and “refugees” need to be junked entirely.

[rdcbn1]

This is a strategic win for Team Trump

It shuts down the influx of illegal aliens into the country and allows Trump to secure the borders

Dealing with those already in the country is going to have to work its way through the courts where Trump Admin will eventually prevail

As a practical matter, the Trump Admin is going to have its hands full and be task saturated removing the million or so criminal illegal aliens , terrorists, sleeper agents, cartel members and other undesirable illegals so its going to take a while to get to the garden variety fraudulent asylum seekers

There is nothing the courts can do about defunding the Biden illegal alien money laundering schemes

[Jim Noble]

This was a three judge panel.

If the Ninth Circuit hears the appeal en banc, no way they will rule for the government.

[Sarah Barracuda]

A commie court did this wow let me go see if any pigs are flying

[RoosterRedux]

Winning.

Now if we can just get an overturn by the DC Appeals Court of the Trump-Boasberg case.

[Magnum44]

Politico notes that the administration must still process refugees approved before January 20.

[dancusa]

I’m shocked.

[kiryandil]

Pacito v. Trump (2:25-cv-00255)

District Court, W.D. Washington

[Impala64ssa]

Yes. I remember back them Michael Savage calling them the 9th Jerkit Whores and Schlemeils

[quilterdebbie]

Wonderful!!!

[FlingWingFlyer]

When will they be locking up Boaburger and his daughter?

[Lazamataz]

This was a three judge panel. If the Ninth Circuit hears the appeal en banc, no way they will rule for the government.

Petition for Rehearing by the Panel: A party may request the same three-judge panel to reconsider its decision.​

Petition for Rehearing En Banc: Alternatively, or additionally, a party can petition for a rehearing en banc. Unlike other circuits where all active judges participate in en banc hearings, the Ninth Circuit employs a "limited en banc" procedure due to its large size. This involves the Chief Judge and ten randomly selected active judges, totaling eleven judges.

So yes, they can petition for an en banc hearing.

[Signalman]

Well that’s some good news in a sea of, lately, bad news involving the courts.

[magua]

Mount up Tom Homan a.k.a. Kemo Sabe!