Posted on 03/03/2025 6:14:27 PM PST by hardspunned
"Reasonable concerns have been raised about various aspects of Ms. Peters’ case. ... the exceptionally lengthy sentence imposed relative to the conduct at issue, the 1st Amendment implications of the trial court’s Oct 2024 assertions relating to Ms. Peters, & whether Colorado’s denial of bail pending appeal was arbitrary or unreasonable under the 8th and 14th Amendments Parallel to these .. DOJ is reviewing cases across the nation for abuses of the criminal justice process. See Attorney General Memorandum, Restoring the Integrity and Credibility of The Department of Justice (February 5, 2025). This review will include an evaluation of the State of Colorado’s prosecution of Ms. Peters and, in particular, whether the case was “oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives.” Executive Order 14147, Ending the Weaponization of The Federal Government (Jan. 20, 2025)."
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
It’s just a lefty bias, but it is definitely there. I’ve found that you can call it out on that and it will stop it for the current session. And the more you point out things, the more it’s responses move neutral or rightward.
Bookmark
Tina Peters merely noticed the corruption. That was her “crime.”
We’re not supposed to notice.
Bump for this very important thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.