Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump: 25% Tariffs on Canada, Mexico and Additional 10% on China Starting March 4
Breitbart ^ | 02/27/2025 | Olivia Rondeau

Posted on 02/27/2025 11:43:27 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

President Donald Trump has confirmed that his proposed tariffs on Mexico and Canada will begin on March 4, with an “additional 10 percent tariff” likely to be charged to China.

Drugs such as fentanyl “are still pouring into our country from Mexico and Canada at very high and unacceptable levels,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, stating that many of them are “made in, and supplied by, China.”

“More than 100,000 people died last year due to the distribution of these dangerous and highly addictive POISONS. Millions of people have died over the last two decades. The families of the victims are devastated and, in many instances, virtually destroyed,” the president continued in his Thursday morning statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: additional; canada; china; crime; drugs; fentanyl; march; mexico; starting; tariffs; trump
Finally, they have been sticking it us for years.
1 posted on 02/27/2025 11:43:27 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What are the key products imported from Canada and Mexico?

Are American companies prepared to produce and sell those products in the measure needed to replace imports of those products?


2 posted on 02/27/2025 12:01:57 PM PST by Arcadian Empire (The Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein, by itself, is deadly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arcadian Empire

We can make them here but there has to be deregulation and massive incentives for plants to expand. It won’t happen overnight, it when it does it will be amazing!!!


3 posted on 02/27/2025 1:40:21 PM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I look at it this way and I’ve done illegal drugs in my youth, If you don’t trust the source you don’t do the drug!
If these people dying are that stupid then well, no loss.
Most dealers don’t want to kill off their
regular clientele.
Dealers are businessmen. If they can keep you hooked and alive for 20 years, much better than a cheaper chopped
dose that kills the customer


4 posted on 02/27/2025 2:29:04 PM PST by rellic (No such thing as a moderate Moslem or Democrat )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arcadian Empire
What are the key products imported from Canada and Mexico?

Lumber is a big one from Canada. My Father-In-Law worked at the Weyerhauser saw mill in Grande Prairie, AB (Grande Prairie hit the news today for a trans stabbing).
5 posted on 02/27/2025 2:37:08 PM PST by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

The lumber in my house is stamped Made In Canada.


6 posted on 02/27/2025 3:33:44 PM PST by Aquamarine (“Be excited about the future of our country. Be excited.” - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I thought he changed it to April 2nd..?


7 posted on 02/27/2025 3:53:14 PM PST by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I am no deal-making genius, but I have been a financial professional for 45 years and I am concerned about tariff warfare.

First, It would make sense to go after ONE adversary, and that would our biggest one, China. Going after EVERY trading partner makes it seem like the White House is emulating Oprah: EU, YOU’ll get a tariff, Canada, YOU’ll get a tariff, Mexico, YOU’ll get a tariff. If we concentrated our fire on China and succeeded in getting better terms, the rest of the world would fall into place.

Second, it’d make sense to lay out your objectives before imposing tariffs. What are the concrete measure that countries can enact to avoid tariffs? I haven’t seen a one. (This parallels the Russian invasion of Ukraine, where Putin never said what his demands were by issuing an ultimatum.)

Third, a lack of specificity in arguing the necessity of imposing them. The offending industries should be listed. If Belgian steel is unfairly underpriced, we should target Belgian steel, not Belgian chocolate.

Fourth, ignoring existing trade treaties. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) was enacted by President Trump on July 1, 2020. In it are the means of settling trade disputes. If it was inadequate, it should never have been signed.

It’s not enough to say, “they have been sticking it to us for years.” Specify how so and what our demands are.

By demanding specific improvements in trade conditions, the Administration will have a better way of measuring success both for it and for the American people.


8 posted on 02/28/2025 7:01:04 AM PST by Miami Rebel (pro-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arcadian Empire

Auto production here in the US relies on Canadian and Mexican components. Sticker prices will soar if 40% of the cost of making a car goes up 10 or 20%


9 posted on 02/28/2025 7:03:13 AM PST by Miami Rebel (pro-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

If all he’s doing (for most of the countries) is mirroring their tariffs on us, then doesn’t that encourage bilateral disarmament? We hammered China pretty hard in the first Trump term and those other nations didn’t change hence the current action.


10 posted on 02/28/2025 7:04:20 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (Plans are worthless, but planning is everything. - Dwight Eisenhower, 1957)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

With all due respect, you are stating generalities.

“We hammered China pretty hard...” How so and what were the specific results? Our trade deficit with China has been fairly sticky at $300-400 billion.

As to “mirroring their tariffs,” that doesn’t make sense to me. I’m not interested in tariffs on products that are imported at fair prices, only those with unfair advantages. My steel/chocolate example expresses that.


11 posted on 02/28/2025 7:11:50 AM PST by Miami Rebel (pro-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

My view is that it is best to have domestically-sourced replacements for key items ready to go before imposing tariffs that may cause prices to go up for those key items.


12 posted on 02/28/2025 7:51:26 AM PST by Arcadian Empire (The Baric-Daszak-Fauci spike protein, by itself, is deadly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arcadian Empire

I agree 100%.


13 posted on 02/28/2025 8:00:07 AM PST by Miami Rebel (pro-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel
How so and what were the specific results?

Apparently increased Treasury income, but maybe everyone's lying about that.

that doesn’t make sense to me.

Product X has a 10% tariff on it, we put a 10% tariff on their's. Probably not a 1:1, but at least it's something and opens the door to "you drop yours and we'll drop ours."

14 posted on 02/28/2025 9:05:23 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (Plans are worthless, but planning is everything. - Dwight Eisenhower, 1957)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson