Skip to comments.
Fired head of the agency that protects whistleblowers sues Trump, saying he was ousted illegally
AP ^
| 02/10/2025
| ALANNA DURKIN RICHER AND ERIC TUCKER
Posted on 02/10/2025 1:58:35 PM PST by mcenedo
The Office of Special Counsel is responsible for protecting the federal workforce from illegal personnel actions, such as retaliation for whistleblowing. It investigates whistleblower claims of reprisal, can pursue disciplinary action against employees who punish whistleblowers and provides a channel for employees to disclose government wrongdoing.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: erictucker; lannadurkinricher; lawfare; leakers; leaks; osc; shapley; specialcounsel; ziegler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator
To: mcenedo
Does Trump or any president have the right to run the executive branch or not? I don’t understand this “you can’t fire me” shtick.
To: mcenedo
They say they’re using Trump. They’re actually using the government. No pennies will come out of Trump’s pocket, for a change.
3
posted on
02/10/2025 2:02:18 PM PST
by
lurk
(u)
To: irishjuggler
“I don’t understand this “you can’t fire me” shtick.”
The five stages of grief are denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.....this dudes still at stage 1.
4
posted on
02/10/2025 2:05:47 PM PST
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!ly)
To: irishjuggler
Somebody better call the WHAAAmbulance
5
posted on
02/10/2025 2:06:44 PM PST
by
Linda Tripp
(America's Best Best Friend)
To: irishjuggler
Agency protecting whistleblowers
_________________
From what I can see, he did not do his job too well!
6
posted on
02/10/2025 3:11:53 PM PST
by
AZJeep
To: AZJeep
You nailed it. Complete failure. Whistleblowers were fired, harassed, lawfare, etc. under his incompetent command.
7
posted on
02/10/2025 3:27:00 PM PST
by
RetiredTexasVet
(Trump has arrived and it is awesome to have a real President.)
To: AZJeep
Every whistle-blower I have seen interviewed (2 from USAID in the last week) have suffered retaliation in major ways & one is involved in a lawsuit that has been ongoing for something like 4 years. “Hamilton” or whoever has held this position prior has, as you noted, not done a good job.
8
posted on
02/10/2025 3:40:01 PM PST
by
Qiviut
(Come! Live in the light! Shine with the joy and the love of the Lord!)
To: RetiredTexasVet
This should be obvious to everyone. Yet he’s complaining to the CIA-funded AssPress that there is no reason to fire him.
To: irishjuggler
They aren’t meant to win, they are just meant to tie Trump up in court forever.
10
posted on
02/10/2025 3:47:36 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Before you post a nasty, stop and think: "Would that person slap me if I said it in person?" )
To: Qiviut
And Trump knows there will be a whole bunch of whistle-blower who need the protection this guy has NOT been providing.
To: butterdezillion
I believe you are correct.
12
posted on
02/10/2025 3:49:11 PM PST
by
Qiviut
(Come! Live in the light! Shine with the joy and the love of the Lord!)
To: RetiredTexasVet
Isn’t the entire mission of DOGE whistle blowing for fraud, waste, and abuse?
13
posted on
02/10/2025 3:49:37 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Before you post a nasty, stop and think: "Would that person slap me if I said it in person?" )
To: AZJeep
14
posted on
02/10/2025 3:50:25 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(GOP RINOs - Get on Board or Get Out!)
To: V_TWIN
“I don’t understand this “you can’t fire me” shtick.”
I think the unions were able to get the Federal Agencies, (excluding DoD) to agree to hiring and firing rules. Again, the agencies agreed to this. Not the Executive. The Executive just let them do it because they usually didn't care. The Executive still has the power to fire outside of the Agencies role, which is what Trump is doing. If this was only an internal agency issue, the guy might have a legal leg to stand on.
Anybody DoD has no leg to stand on at all, they are always at the discretion of the CiC.
15
posted on
02/10/2025 3:55:06 PM PST
by
wbarmy
(Trying to do better.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Technically I think DOGE is basically an impromptu audit.
16
posted on
02/10/2025 3:56:27 PM PST
by
RetiredTexasVet
(Trump has arrived and it is awesome to have a real President.)
To: wbarmy
In civilian agencies only regular employees are allowed to be union members.
Anyone who supervises or manages anyone else is not eligible and is not covered by a union contract.
That means the subject of this thread can be fired on the spot—zero issue.
17
posted on
02/10/2025 3:58:22 PM PST
by
cgbg
(The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
To: wbarmy
I have friends at the DoD facility I worked at that WANT to take the early retirement offer, and from what little they are being told (and that’s not much) the offer isn’t open to them.
It’s kind of a mess really.
18
posted on
02/10/2025 5:09:48 PM PST
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!ly)
To: V_TWIN
The civilian and military pieces of the government have always had different rules.
This particular buyout is for civilian agencies—not complicated at all.
19
posted on
02/10/2025 5:18:36 PM PST
by
cgbg
(The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise.)
To: V_TWIN
Probably DoD isn’t involved because the vast majority of DoD civilians can probably tell you what they do, and why.
20
posted on
02/10/2025 8:29:06 PM PST
by
wbarmy
(Trying to do better.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson