Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Administration Files Emergency Motion to Vacate Treasury’s Restraining Order — Asserts ‘No Court Can Sever Presidential Supervision Mandated by Article II’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 2/10/2025 | jim hoft

Posted on 02/10/2025 5:50:41 AM PST by bitt

The Trump administration has filed an emergency motion to vacate an ex parte temporary restraining order issued by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

This order egregiously interferes with the executive branch’s operations by limiting access to crucial Treasury Department systems.

On Saturday, Obama appointee Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued an ex parte temporary restraining order that restricted access to Treasury systems exclusively to “civil servants,” explicitly excluding “all political appointees” from accessing these systems.

Ex parte means the “Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome.”

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump’s political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without… pic.twitter.com/gauqMKURvY

— @amuse (@amuse) February 8, 2025

The order temporarily blocks the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, and Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, from accessing a sensitive payment system that distributes Americans’ tax returns, Social Security benefits, disability payments, and federal employee salaries.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: doge; emergencymotion; jeannettevargas; paulengelmayer; treasury; vacate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 02/10/2025 5:50:41 AM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


2 posted on 02/10/2025 5:51:01 AM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

If the revelations of massive fraudulent activity in the USAID programs are replicated in many other branches of government — not just USAID and Treasury — the electorate when informed will be duly and rightly incensed. Open the books EVERYWHERE.


3 posted on 02/10/2025 5:54:54 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Sounds like Trump is going to abide by the ruling until/if it is vacated. Barf.


4 posted on 02/10/2025 5:55:32 AM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

So he ordered the Administration to destroy evidence of government wrongdoing, including waste fraud and abuse. This order violates anti-retaliation statutes and whistleblower proections.


5 posted on 02/10/2025 5:55:57 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

These are the parasites that are drinking our blood.


6 posted on 02/10/2025 5:56:23 AM PST by oldbrowser ( The sanctity of the law has been irreversibly stained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.


7 posted on 02/10/2025 5:56:57 AM PST by Ken Regis (I concur )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Kinda disappointed Trump took the legal route.

Trump should have just went to Treasury in person gave the orders of what he wanted done.

Delegated to Bissent and Musk, then said I’ll be back tomorrow to see who’s been naughty and nice, and act accordingly.


8 posted on 02/10/2025 5:57:50 AM PST by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Good that they fight back, and right away.

Otherwise the System will use a flurry of lawsuits to block the Trump Admin.

This deliberate insubordination must be stopped now.


9 posted on 02/10/2025 5:57:59 AM PST by canuck_conservative (Russia lies all the time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Good that they fight back, and right away.

Otherwise the System will use a flurry of lawsuits to block the Trump Admin.

This deliberate insubordination must be stopped now.


10 posted on 02/10/2025 5:57:59 AM PST by canuck_conservative (Russia lies all the time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Give that lefty judge a legal Bitch Slap.


11 posted on 02/10/2025 5:58:07 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Where is SCOTUS? I imagine Amy is shopping for designer children, and Roberts is diddlin' the choir boys.

12 posted on 02/10/2025 5:58:48 AM PST by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and His mercy endureth forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

one of the really smart things Trump and Musk did was swoop in quickly and grab the information before these crooks could hide their tracks.

That is why they got this hack judge to try to get Trump to destroy the evidence. To give them time to cover their tracks without evidence they they did it.

Hopefully Trump wont fall for this.


13 posted on 02/10/2025 5:59:09 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Good idea so many judges are proving they support corruption there are other avenues to challenge a presidents rulings.

Just because a judge has a robe it doesn’t mean it comes with a crown.


14 posted on 02/10/2025 6:00:01 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Admittedly, ignoring the order of a Federal judge — even if it’s unlawful — is a very thick line to cross. This should be a very easy appeal to win, so doing things the right way is a way to stay on the straight and narrow while showing the contrasting path taking by their enemies.


15 posted on 02/10/2025 6:00:47 AM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The fact that it was an ex parte decision alone makes it irrelevant.


16 posted on 02/10/2025 6:01:32 AM PST by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

*taken


17 posted on 02/10/2025 6:01:39 AM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Its good they did this. It shuts the door to a shampeachment for 'dastardly deeds'.
I hope there is something in the works for these hack judges. DC circuit an SDNY seem to be hotbeds of this crap.
18 posted on 02/10/2025 6:02:33 AM PST by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt; Lazamataz; Allegra; Fred Nerks
Judge Paul Engelmayer by day:



Judge Paul Engelmayer by night in the swamp:



Swampily, he egregiously violates the Constitutional Doctrine of Separation of Powers.A dirty, rotten,stinking, impeachable, lefty swamp creature.

But we won't send gangs of threatening demonstrators to his home to bang on drums all night long, while refusing him personal security.We wouldn't do that would we?

19 posted on 02/10/2025 6:02:46 AM PST by Candor7 (Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

He let them shoot at him, didn’t he?


20 posted on 02/10/2025 6:04:08 AM PST by Empire_of_Liberty ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson