Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Trump's Pick for CIA Director Confirmed in Senate by Wide Margin
Red State ^ | 01/23/2025 | Ward Clark

Posted on 01/23/2025 8:24:35 PM PST by SeekAndFind

On Thursday, the United States Senate voted to confirm former Rep. GOP representative and former Director of National Intelligence under Trump 1.0 John Ratcliffe (R-TX) as the next Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The final vote tally by voice vote was 74 in favor and 25 against. Mr. Ratcliffe has now been officially confirmed as Director of the CIA. The one Senator who did not vote, for reasons as yet unknown, was John Fetterman (D-PA). As of this writing, the formal roll call tally has not yet been released. 

On Tuesday, President Trump said about John Ratcliffe:

Trump touted Ratcliffe’s loyalty Tuesday, saying in his announcement:“From exposing fake Russian collusion to be a Clinton campaign operation, to catching the FBI’s abuse of Civil Liberties at the FISA Court, John Ratcliffe has always been a warrior for Truth and Honesty with the American Public.”

A CIA official told CNN on Tuesday that the agency is “committed to ensuring a smooth transition.”

During his confirmation hearings, Mr. Ratcliffe vowed to return the CIA to its core mission of intelligence-gathering:

Testifying last week before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Ratcliffe said he's devoted his professional life to national security "for roughly a quarter of a century." And he promised that if confirmed, he would focus on "setting and communicating priorities and demanding relentless execution."

He pledged that if was confirmed, the CIA would be rededicated to its intelligence-gathering mission.

"We will collect intelligence — especially human intelligence — in every corner of the globe, no matter how dark or difficult," Ratcliffe said.

With this vote, now-Director Ratcliffe can begin doing just that. Ratcliffe has also stated that he views China as America's primary geopolitical rival and has vowed to pursue intelligence-gathering not only on America's rivals but also on terror groups, drug cartels, and other criminal organizations.


Previously on RedState: Senate Gets to Work: Votes Several Trump Nominees Out of Committee (Updated)

RedState Weekly Briefing: ActBlue Blues and KJP Reviews, As Ratcliffe Twists the Screws


Senate Democrats tried to slow-walk the vote with procedural games:

Senate Democrats slowed Ratcliffe's confirmation after his nomination advanced out of committee earlier this week, forcing procedural maneuvers to extend consideration of his nomination in recent days. Still, Ratcliffe's nomination was advanced with wide margins in a 72-26 procedural vote Thursday morning.

Sen. John Barrasso, the Republican whip, celebrated that the Senate was poised to confirm Ratcliffe's nomination, calling it "a win for our national security," while noting that it "should have been done two days ago."

"But Democrats unnecessarily delayed this important vote," Barrasso continued. "John Ratcliffe is undeniably qualified for the job, he's going to lead the CIA without bias, and with the safety of the American people being his priority."

Mr. Ratcliffe served in President Trump's first term, from May 2020 to the end of the president's term in 2021, as Director of National Intelligence. Before this, Mr. Ratcliffe served two terms in the House of Representatives representing Texas's 4th Congressional District following service as United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas.

This follows the confirmation of former Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) as Secretary of State. More confirmation votes are expected before Trump's first week ends. Stay tuned.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; US: Pennsylvania; US: Texas; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: bestpeople; cia; confirmation; deepstate; establishment; fbi; fisa; fisacourt; florida; johnbarrasso; johnfetterman; johnratcliffe; marcorubio; pennsylvania; swampcreature; texas; trumpmas; wardclark; wyoming

1 posted on 01/23/2025 8:24:35 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wouldn’t it be funny if, for once, the Dems suddenly changed to being on the side of GOP nominee approval harmony (after visits by the CIA agents apprising them of the blackmail evidence the new boss uncovered.)

Jake Blues: We think Mrs. Sline will be interested in seeing these photos.


2 posted on 01/23/2025 8:40:27 PM PST by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

Or maybe Ratliffe is actually Brennan’s b***h and the Democrats know it so they go along. Lara Logan posted something about that on X the other day.


3 posted on 01/23/2025 8:46:09 PM PST by Venkman (The )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As long as Fetterman votes for Hegseth


4 posted on 01/23/2025 8:48:51 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venkman

Yeah, seriously. If the Dems support the guy, i’m assuming that he’s not the sort of swamp-drainer we need.


5 posted on 01/23/2025 9:28:15 PM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Ratcliffe was originally refused by McConnell and Burr, and Grennell was appointed acting.

After Grennell spent a few months turning over desks and setting the curtains on fire, McConnell and Burr changed their minds and decided that Ratcliffe was good after all.

Now when you have half the Democrats voting for him, it just shows how much the Overton Window has moved.


6 posted on 01/23/2025 10:59:29 PM PST by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

I feel bad for General Mike Flynn right now and wish he’d make a comeback somehow.


7 posted on 01/23/2025 11:36:56 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

That was exactly my reaction.


8 posted on 01/24/2025 2:23:58 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It kinda scares me that he sailed through so easily.


9 posted on 01/24/2025 3:52:45 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

He’s a former congressman. The dems usually show deference to their own.

Ratcliffe was a good guy for Trump when being a good guy was tough. As DNI he declassified a Russian intelligence document that even CNN described as:

“ The declassified document, which includes a Russian intelligence assessment from 2016 that Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to “stir up a scandal” against then-candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Russia and the hack of the Democratic National Committee, has sparked charges from Democrats that Ratcliffe was politicizing intelligence and sharing Russian disinformation.”

EC


10 posted on 01/24/2025 5:25:08 AM PST by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Con777

I pray you are right. I trust Trump.


11 posted on 01/24/2025 5:41:49 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Radcliffe I feel is PDJT’s worse pick.

We will see what he does on day ONE at the CIA.


12 posted on 01/24/2025 5:55:06 AM PST by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Trump should be willing not to campaign for his opponent in exchange for some support. Having a Repuke hold you hostage because they vote trade is BS. I’d take a reasonable Democrat 90% of the time. Trump should also find a reasonable Democrat in AK


13 posted on 01/24/2025 6:12:36 AM PST by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

Murkowski wins in Alaska because Democrats cross over and vote for her, she is beholden to them.


14 posted on 01/24/2025 6:14:05 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Venkman

“Or maybe Ratliffe is actually Brennan’s b***h and the Democrats know it so they go along.”

It was too easy.


15 posted on 01/24/2025 6:22:28 AM PST by dljordan (What would Michael Collins do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Congratulations, John Ratcliffe! I admired your role in the house. Such composure. I said, this guy . . . and here you are. Blast from the past
16 posted on 01/24/2025 7:16:02 AM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

THE missing vote should be J D VANCE.

HOW is the vote being calculated???


17 posted on 01/24/2025 7:56:38 AM PST by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

So Republicans need to cross over and support a Democrat. This isn’t so complicated


18 posted on 01/24/2025 10:49:56 AM PST by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson