Posted on 01/22/2025 2:47:52 PM PST by hardspunned
Kamala Harris was all smiles and affection for her 'beloved' second gentleman Doug Emhoff in the immediate aftermath of her crushing presidential election defeat.
But now that President Donald Trump has been sworn into office, for sore loser Harris, it is now all about the blame game, and her target has flipped to her 'dead weight' husband.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The MSM downplayed those scandals, and I doubt most voters even heard about them. Kamala was her own wrecking ball.
He didn’t look very “involved” at the Inauguration.
LMAO
no one cared about that stupid John who fell for your suction. They cared that you were retarded and totally unfit for office.
Classic liberal and doubly so for a liberal woman, it is not her fault, the man is always to blame.
LOL they soo deserve each other!
“They cared that you were retarded and totally unfit for office.”
Nothing more needs to said. +1
Impressive leadership.
Like all libtards. Never responsible for their own screwups. Everything is always someone else’s fault.
How can one learn from one’s mistakes if one never makes mistakes. ode to a LibTard
What was that Jack Nicholson character’s line about reason and accountability again???
Exactly. Good God. Only the comatose and cultist would vote for the Word Salad Queen. It is a source of extreme irritation that she came as close as she did.
😆
Nobody stirs the pot like the British press.
On his show, Ben Shapiro has said he cannot wait to read the books written about the Biden/Harris White House and the campaign. I tend to agree, they will be great reading!
Good Gutfeld line about the past:
“Looked as worried as Emhoff seeing the nanny was gaining weight.”
> Kamala was her own wrecking ball. <
True that. But sometimes I wonder if even Kamala had anything to do with it. I think most folks were either voting for Trump or against Trump.
Just my take.
I doubt that 1% of voters even know who Doug Emhoff is.
Denial runs deep. He had nothing to do with their loss.
I just did a search of Emhoff and New York Times.
According to them he was a fine and outstanding guy.
If he did beat up on women their readers sure would not know anything about it.
When in doubt always blame a man.
Always.
If Emhoff was such an albatross then how come nearly all Americans had to be informed of who the heck he was?
Because she’s better looking than Cum Alla?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.