Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Attorney Makes ‘Desperate’ Attempt To Win Back Jurors in $1 Billion Defamation Lawsuit—and Appears To Fall Flat
Washington Free Beacon ^ | January 9, 2025 | Jessica Costescu

Posted on 01/11/2025 6:11:34 AM PST by Twotone

PANAMA CITY, Fla.—CNN’s lead attorney, dealing with a jury that appeared bored as he grilled a Navy veteran over his finances, pivoted toward an explosive charge on Thursday. He effectively accused Zachary Young of lying when he testified that he hadn’t worked since CNN aired a segment accusing him of operating in an "illegal black market."

The attorney, David Axelrod, produced a document he said was a contract between Young and an employer, Helios Global Inc., that was signed one month after the November 2021 segment ran. He argued that the case wouldn’t have gone to trial if Young had produced the record as he was required.

"I'm sorry I'm getting upset, but [Young’s lead attorney Devin] Freedman has been talking to the press for years about what a terrible company CNN is," Axelrod said. "The fact is, this lawsuit was a fraud from day one."

"I'll say, your Honor, that later on today, after I confer with counsel, we will be filing a motion about fraud on the court and gross discovery allegation abuses," he added.

If true, the accusation could have turned the tide in Young’s lawsuit against the network. Instead, it appeared to fall flat.

In follow-up testimony, Young said the document was simply a form he had to sign to maintain his security clearance, meaning it didn’t contradict his prior testimony. In fact, the document didn’t even include a signature from a Helios Global representative.

Young is seeking $1 billion in damages from CNN, alleging that the segment on The Lead with Jake Tapper irreparably harmed his reputation and destroyed his company, Nemex Enterprises.

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: cnn; defamation; florida
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last

1 posted on 01/11/2025 6:11:34 AM PST by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Hold on... they missed the lede! CNN’s lead attorney is Barrack Obama’s chief campaign strategist and senior advisor, David Axelrod?!


2 posted on 01/11/2025 6:15:52 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

bkmk


3 posted on 01/11/2025 6:20:38 AM PST by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Not much to go on in this article, and it kinda sounds like a necessary document may not have been submitted by the plaintiff.

I try to be fair-minded and reasonable, but... “This is CNN” ... Screw ‘em. Hope they lose!!


4 posted on 01/11/2025 6:29:29 AM PST by DJ Frisat (If I said something really stupid, chances are I was under the influence of AutoCorrect. 🙄🫤)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I believe it is a different David Axelrod.

https://www.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/2023/06/12/david-axelrod-pivoting-white-collar-skills-to-find-success-in-defamation-trial/


5 posted on 01/11/2025 6:31:38 AM PST by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat

It doesn’t sound like that “contract” fulfilled what Axelrod was implying. It wasn’t a fully complete document, with signatures from both parties. But it’s interesting that the jury doesn’t seem to care much.


6 posted on 01/11/2025 6:34:45 AM PST by Twotone ( What's the difference between a politician & a flying pig? The letter "F.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

I can’t think of a worse venue for CNN than Panama City, Florida.

The city and the people are great; CNN can expect a fair trial and a just verdict.

That has to terrify CNN.


7 posted on 01/11/2025 6:36:09 AM PST by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Maybe Elon Musk will be able to buy CNN with the change in his pocket.


8 posted on 01/11/2025 6:38:34 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

BTTT


9 posted on 01/11/2025 6:39:45 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

I hope this Navy vet cleans CNNs evil clock.


10 posted on 01/11/2025 6:58:08 AM PST by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The way CNN is going, they will have to pay Elon to take over


11 posted on 01/11/2025 7:02:06 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

The real question is, did they contract services with him. If not, that is proof of damages.

There is a big difference between having a contract and actually performing work under a contract.

Contracts have many conditional clauses. This was a contract that he was to be paid for work they asked him to do. If they didn’t ask him to do any work, why?

If I sign an engagement letter with an attorney and then don’t give him any work, the contract is meaningless.


12 posted on 01/11/2025 7:09:03 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gunnut

AXELROD IS A COMMON JEWISH NAME.


13 posted on 01/11/2025 7:15:19 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

As is David.


14 posted on 01/11/2025 7:27:48 AM PST by arthurus (covfefe ,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I think we all will by the time this is done.


15 posted on 01/11/2025 7:27:54 AM PST by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy saints surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gunnut

There’s two ?!? Eek!


16 posted on 01/11/2025 8:09:05 AM PST by j.havenfarm (24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat

If you have a security clearance, and your employment is terminated, your clearance is still good for a year (or so it was years ago). It sounds like the form in question extended the plaintiff’s clearance — that is not the same thing as a job offer.


17 posted on 01/11/2025 8:32:09 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat

I’m not familiar with the form in question, but I’m inclined to believe it would go to the Defense Department, not the contractor.


18 posted on 01/11/2025 8:33:30 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

No sympathy for that horde of idiot vets and guys like Markwayne Mullen who tried to flood in all the afghans they found into America. They were emotion driven and bringing people to America that will only hurt us more.

I know, kite runner, three cups of tea… yadda yadda.

CNN sucks, but he’s no hero


19 posted on 01/11/2025 8:44:23 AM PST by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Maybe he’s waiting until he can get it for nothing.


20 posted on 01/11/2025 8:47:17 AM PST by Savage Beast (There's a Light over the Whole World. Fight! Fight! Fight! --DJTrump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson