Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States Take Their Fight to Defund Planned Parenthood to the Supreme Court
Life News ^ | December 19, 2024 | Dave Andrusko

Posted on 12/20/2024 11:53:59 AM PST by Morgana

On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Kerr v. Planned Parenthood. At issue is a 2018 order by pro-life South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster directing the state’s Department of Health and Human Services to stop abortion facilities from receiving taxpayer funds from the state’s Medicaid program.

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) is representing the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

“We are pleased that the U.S. Supreme Court will take up Kerr v. Planned Parenthood,” said NRLC President Carol Tobias. “Taxpayers should not be forced into supporting or supplementing abortion facilities and states should not be forced to override state pro-life laws that citizens support.”

Tobias went on to say, “No American taxpayer should be forced to use their hard-earned dollars to put more money toward Planned Parenthood’s over $2 billion a year in funding. It is good that the U.S. Supreme Court will weigh in on the rights of citizens to direct how their state spends taxpayer funds.”

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson expressed his strong support for the case. “Although we are not a party to this lawsuit, I am adamantly opposed to any taxpayer money going towards funding abortions,” he said in a statement. “I’m glad to hear the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear this case.”

Following a decision by the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that ruled against the state, ADF asked the high court to take the case.

“Taxpayer dollars should never be used to fund facilities that make a profit off abortion,” said ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of Appellate Advocacy John Bursch. “Pro-life states like South Carolina should be free to determine that Planned Parenthood and other entities that peddle abortion are not qualified to receive taxpayer funding through Medicaid. Congress did not unambiguously create a right for Medicaid recipients to drag states into federal court to challenge those decisions, so no such right exists.”

If the High Court applies its decision in the Talevski case, John Bursch said, “We expect the court to hold that Congress did not intend to allow federal courts to second guess states’ decisions about which providers are qualified to receive Medicaid funding.”

According to ADF

After South Carolina determined that Planned Parenthood was not qualified to receive taxpayer funding as part of its Medicaid program, a federal district court forced the state to permanently restore Planned Parenthood’s funding. ADF attorneys appealed to the 4th Circuit, which ruled against allowing the state to terminate Planned Parenthood as a qualified Medicaid provider.

ADF attorneys then filed a petition with the Supreme Court asking it to hear the case and affirm that the Medicaid Act does not create a private right for Medicaid recipients to challenge a state’s decision that a specific provider like Planned Parenthood is not qualified to receive taxpayer funding. The Supreme Court granted that petition and sent the case back to the 4th Circuit for further consideration after its decision in Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski. The 4th Circuit again ruled against South Carolina, prompting attorneys to file another petition before the Supreme Court.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: abortion; plannedparenthood; prolife; scotus; southcarolina; taxes

1 posted on 12/20/2024 11:53:59 AM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Bueno. Taking the initiative at the State level is exactly what needs to be done. Put the baby-killers on the defensive rather than just letting them run the board.
2 posted on 12/20/2024 12:00:56 PM PST by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

From the article: NRLC President Carol Tobias: “No American taxpayer should be forced to use their hard-earned dollars to put more money toward Planned Parenthood’s over $2 billion a year in funding. It is good that the U.S. Supreme Court will weigh in on the rights of citizens to direct how their state spends taxpayer funds.”

I’m thrilled the US Supreme Court is hearing this case. Why are we, who vehemently oppose the slaughter of the innocent, forced to pay for it?

The Democrats love PP because much of the money PP generates through killing babies and selling their body parts goes into their campaign coffers.

Thank God Biden didn’t get to pack the court.


3 posted on 12/20/2024 12:06:24 PM PST by bimboeruption ((“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRob 12-2-2023) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
The basis of a VALID US Supreme Court decision is the Constitution.

Nowhere does the Constitution authorize the feds to fund or meddle with abortion or any healthcare at all.

The Supreme Court should NUKE FEDERAL HEALTHCARE!!!!

4 posted on 12/20/2024 12:20:34 PM PST by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Since when does Planned Parenthood - or any other private organization - have a right to public funding?


5 posted on 12/20/2024 12:51:48 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

And all this mess, tens of millions of deaths, expense, fracturing of society is due to the decision of seven lawyers in 1973.


6 posted on 12/20/2024 2:07:59 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

The underlying cause is the gradual acquiesce of Americans to allow the federal gov’t to go outside its constitutional boundaries beginning around 1900.


7 posted on 12/20/2024 2:32:55 PM PST by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bimboeruption
The Democrats love PP because much of the money PP generates through killing babies and selling their body parts goes into their campaign coffers.

That is the most important reason they will admit to. They won't say it, but they love how easy access to abortion for minorities allows them to keep down the number of 'undesirables and inferiors', as Margaret Sanger put it.

8 posted on 12/20/2024 4:44:05 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt ( Fascist, deplorable and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt


What many Americans voted for in November, 2008:

And Manchurian Candidate Barack Hussein Obama made certain (in Illinois) that any baby that SURVIVED AN ABORTION ATTEMPT was left WITHOUT MEDICAL TREATMENT TO DIE. Obama (in Illinois) blocked BAIPA.



Then there's the "shout your abortion" people...


9 posted on 12/20/2024 10:02:30 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Day's of Lot; They id Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This should also be done Federally.


10 posted on 12/25/2024 8:15:18 AM PST by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral creulty of the Biden-Harris regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson