Nevada Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots without postmarks can be counted after Election Day

November 8th:

Oh, look! A Boxcar full of ballots!.............

Nevada Supreme Court rules the counting will continue for the next 100 election?.

I’ve been screaming this for awhile. Beat them at their own rules.

That’s what I thought too. Why this arbitrary limit. If it’s not governed by a law then why not until January 6th?

Remember the PA Supremes changed the rules in the 11th hour. Now everybody’s doing it.

Fun days.

One that was dropped off at election center. This is good ruling for Reps as I understand it. I could see the PO not postmarking mail in ballots from Republican areas to void their votes. Dems have no issue getting postmarks.

So some dumbboy “judge” has stretched the friggin’ election out to four years unless the RATS demand a recount.

The Fifth decision applies to MS, LA and TX.

I gotta’ hand it to rats. Once they achieve power, they take all measures necessary to remain in power.

It should be a law that morons who want to be “judges” need at least an 8th grade education.

They just have to sneak them into the mail room....they may have never seen the mail...

I realize that, but then how hard would it be to fake a postmark? If you are going to violate one Federal law (sneaking ballots into the mailroom, why stop there?

I occasionally receive a letter without a postmark/stamp cancellation. So it happens. But it doesn’t happen hundreds or thousands of times. Large numbers of un-postmarked ballots should raise all kinds of red flags.

Hopefully the conflicting ruling will be appealed to SCOTUS, which will cut off all ballots received after election day.

Any way this can go to a higher appeals court?

I know that in 2020, covid systematically disabled USPS’s mail handling machines, necessitating emergency workarounds. But that was four years ago. Surely by now all the machines have been vaxxed and triple masked????

Heck... Florida never counted the military absentee votes during Bush/Gore, which they could have done because the threshold of victory was so low (which is what triggers the counting of military absentee votes if you didn’t know that already) but somehow or another those military absentee votes which numbered in the hundreds of thousands disappeared and were never heard of again AND I have never heard anybody talk about it after the “mefia” went dark on the subject!

Seems reasonable that if it received by election day it should count. I guess only question is how was it received, hopefully not delivered at 11:30 pm by an unmarked vehicle.

No denial here. We must be ready 5o go to war I’m November, if necessary.

I always thought that judges applied the law that exists not create the law to suite themselves.

As the 5th circuit just ruled this violates the constitution and federal law. Just because the court did not choose to act on it the law is still being violated. And people should go to jail for that. Including these judges.

Thank you for referencing that article hole_n_one. Please note that the following critique is directed at the misguided (imo) courts and not at you.

"Nevada Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots without postmarks can be counted after Election Day"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Judges seem to be ignoring the Constitution's rules for electoral votes imo.

To begin with, the states have never expressly constitutionally given ordinary citizen voters the power to vote for POTUS like we have for members of Congress. Our votes for POTUS are basically nothing more than corrupt political party smoke and mirrors, probably intended to make voters think that they are in control of the Oval Office.

To the contrary, the Constitution mandates a very small number of official state legislature-appointed electors for each state.

After all, constitutional drafters established the Electoral College to make sure that the right person is in the wartime Oval Office.

At the other extreme, the Electoral College is MAJOR OVERKILL for making sure that the right person is in the peacetime Oval Office to make sure that your mail is delivered promptly, the US Mail Service, let's also include militia readiness, being arguably most of the very few powers that the states have given to the feds to dictate domestic policy.

"Article I, Section 8, Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;"
"It is one of a few government agencies explicitly authorized by the Constitution of the United States." (non-FR)
The congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, a constitutional lawmaker, had clarified the federal government's constitutionally limited powers as follows.
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

In other words, if a given federal social spending program is not reasonably related to the Mail Service, then you can bet that it is unconstitutional, based on stolen state powers, and win your bet probably most of the time.

The bottom line is that, based on Rep. John Bingham's clarification above of state power to serve the people, the corrupt political parties, working in cahoots with the likewise corrupt media to control the constitutionally limited power (hint) Oval Office, are actually fighting to control state powers that they have stolen from the states, most federal domestic policy based on stolen state powers imo.

Getting back to constitutional electoral vote rules, note that official electors are required to meet together, vote by write-in ballot, make lists of vote totals for each candidate, then sign, certify, seal and transmit the sealed lists to President of Senate in unbroken chain of custody imo.

"Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 (2.1.2): Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress [emphasis added]: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector."
Excerpted from 12A:
"The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots [all emphases added] the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice- President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; ..."

Given electoral vote rules, it is logistically impossible for millions of unauthorized POTUS voters in each state to meet together and comply with these rules imo.

Also, note that 12A requires only the small number of electors (see 2.1.2 above) in each state to certify candidate vote counts, federal Democrats possibly refusing to certify a hopeful Trump 47 win just more 12A-ignoring smoke and mirrors imo.

Democrats Have Objected to Electoral Vote Certification For the Last 3 GOP Presidents (1.1.21)

Next, I'm going to pick on California (CA) regarding how long it might take a small number of official electors to determine who gets their state's electoral votes, CA's electoral votes the most of any state.

Simply put, given CA's 64 electors, I could probably tally votes for all candidates, including double-checking totals, in under an hour.

In other words, the work of deciding candidate vote totals from millions of political party politically correct voters is more political smoke screen, evidenced by compromised FN (imo) saying that totals might not be ready for a few days.

HERE WE GO AGAIN: Head of Fox News Decision Desk Warns Election Result Will Take Around Five Days (10.21.24)

Also, regarding state winner-take-all laws for electoral votes, the states actually surrendered their power to make such laws when they ratified Constitution with its electoral vote rules imo.

In fact, despite hypocritical "all votes count" mantra by elite desperate Democrats, Justice Joseph Story had explained that when political parties divide a state's electoral votes, doing so weakens (obviously) a state's total electoral votes for each candidate, comparable to when a state's federal senators vote yes and no on an issue, effectively cancelling each other's votes.

"In case of any party divisions in a state, it may neutralize its whole vote [emphasis added], while all the other states give an unbroken electoral vote." —Justice Joseph Story, Article 2, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3, Commentaries on the Constitution 3, 1833.

Consider the possibility that desperate elite Democrats are evidently so concerned that may not win enough constitutionally unauthorized ordinary citizen votes in given state in order to unconstitutionally win all of a state's electoral votes, that they are resorting to unconstitutional votes of illegal aliens just for an extra push to try to win constitutionally meaningless majority popular vote for such states.

Since Congress and renegade states have repeatedly proven that they are enemies of the people imo, it is now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to effectively "impeach and remove" ALL (exceptions?) state and federal lawmakers and executives in November.

In fact, it's up to us Trump supporters to take the first MAJOR step in draining the swamp by supporting hopeful Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp.

Finally, let's not allow the anti-Trump media try to fade our memories of what we witnessed on July 13.