Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radical, Populist,Extreme, Nationalist: How Should We Be Talking About the Far Right?
Euronews ^ | 17/10/2024 | Amandine Hess

Posted on 10/18/2024 12:55:58 PM PDT by nickcarraway

The three most right-wing groups of the European Parliament and their members are all known as "far-right" — but they have some crucial differences.

The members of Patriots for Europe met in Brussels for the first time on Thursday, convening on the sidelines of the European summit.

The group is one of three at the right-wing end of the European Parliament, joined by Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN) and the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR).

The parties making up these three parliamentary groups are generally nationalist, sovereigntist, conservative and Eurosceptic, thoguh their positions differ on Russia and Ukraine and on their precise relationship to the European Union.

But while they can all be classified as far-right in one way or another, most of them reject this label.

Extreme right, hard right, radical right, national conservative, populist: these terms have invaded European public debate, and the lines between them are becoming increasingly blurry. So where do the differences really lie?

Euronews spoke to an expert about how to classify them.

Extremist, illiberal and nativist

"The Europe of Sovereign Nations is the most extreme far-right group in the European Parliament," says Dave Sinardet, Professor of Political Science at the Free Flemish University of Brussels.

Created in July, it is now the newest and smallest parliamentary group, and the notorious Alternative for Germany accounts for more than half of the group's 25 members. Also on board are a Polish party, Confederation, and Bulgarian MEPs from the pro-Russian party Renaissance.

Sinardet says a number of these parties can justifiably be described as extremist.

"This means that they do not always respect parliamentary democracy and that they have a number of authoritarian traits," he explained.

The professor also describes the group as illiberal, because it has problems accepting the independence of the judiciary, the rule of law and individual freedoms, and nativist, because of its opposition to immigration and the distinctions it draws between immigrants and native-born citizens.

"The parties that are clearly illiberal and nativist are to be found mainly in the Europe of Sovereign Nations," says Sinardet. "Some parties that are part of the Patriots for Europe can also be considered illiberal".

Populism, not demagogy

With 86 MEPs, the Patriots for Europe is the third largest force in the European Parliament.

Created in July, its members make up a who's who of European right-wingers: from France, Marine Le Pen's Rassemblement National; from Hungary, Viktor Orbán's Fidesz; from Italy, Matteo Salvini's League; from Spain, Santiago Abascal's Vox party; and from Austria, Herbert Kickl's FPÖ.

Patriots for Europe and Europe of Sovereign Nations can also be classified as populist, according to the professor.

Often confused with demagogy, populism refers to a binary vision of society that pits an elite presented as corrupt against "the people", who are presented as homogeneous and pure.

Populism can be left- or right-wing. The strongly left-wing La France Insoumise, for example, is also widely considered a populist party.

Recipe for radicalism

Finally, some parties of the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) are often described not as far-right or extreme, but "radical right".

With 78 MEPs, this group is mainly built around Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's party, Brothers of Italy, and former Polish leader Jarosław Kaczyński's Law and Justice.

According to political scientist Cas Mudde, the term radical right refers to parties that combine two ideologies: nativism and authoritarianism, which together consider adherence to authority a supreme value.

"Not all European conservative and reformist parties can be considered radical right-wing," adds Sinardet. "They are often rather nationalist and conservative. But others can be considered radical right-wing".


TOPICS: Culture/Society; European Union; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chat; eu; euroweenies; farrightwins; gaslighting; notfarright

1 posted on 10/18/2024 12:55:58 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Just don’t call them far-left communist, fascist pigs.


2 posted on 10/18/2024 12:57:46 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I've come to the conclusion that the world is made up of millions of Three Stooges comedians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hiw about normal?


3 posted on 10/18/2024 12:58:14 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

How about extreme centrists ?


4 posted on 10/18/2024 1:02:26 PM PDT by oldbrowser ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Cuddly? Lovable? Unspeakably handsome? Too cool for school?


5 posted on 10/18/2024 1:16:25 PM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Leftists: Everyone I hate is literally HITLER!


6 posted on 10/18/2024 1:24:04 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Remember these are same people that claim Stalin was a moderate...


7 posted on 10/18/2024 1:39:01 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

what they do they accuse others of


8 posted on 10/18/2024 3:19:00 PM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The professor also describes the group as illiberal, because it has problems accepting the independence of the judiciary, the rule of law and individual freedoms,

"Professor" dear, please define what you mean by those terms.

The "Rule of LAW" for example are you saying that those who are actually for upholding the law that says you should not break into a country and harm the citizens of the country are actually "against the law"?

Or that people who want the law followed are against the "individual freedoms" of criminals?

Or that they do not support the "the independence of the judiciary" who are not punishing criminals but are quite willing to lock up those who have "mean thoughts" about criminals who have broken into their country and using their "individual freedoms" to do harm to the citizens?

This "what ever it is" should be forced to read a dictionary.< P>

9 posted on 10/18/2024 3:30:25 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ( Not my circus. Not my monkeys. But I can pick out the clowns at 100 yards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
I now identify as "Normal America".
10 posted on 10/18/2024 3:30:58 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ( Not my circus. Not my monkeys. But I can pick out the clowns at 100 yards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson