Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgia judge rules election officials can't delay certification because of fraud concerns
CBS News ^ | October 15, 2024 | Graham Kates

Posted on 10/15/2024 10:32:41 AM PDT by Coronal

Elections officials in Georgia have to certify results by the date required in state law, a judge ruled Monday, saying they have no discretion to delay certification because of fraud concerns or other potential issues that may arise as votes are being counted.

Fulton County Judge Robert McBurney wrote in an order Monday that "election superintendents in Georgia have a mandatory fixed obligation to certify election results" by Nov. 12.

The ruling came in a case filed by Julie Adams, a Republican member of the Fulton County election board, who argued election board members had leeway around certification. She wrote in her complaint that she would be "unable to fulfill her oath of office" if not empowered to investigate for fraud.

McBurney, who also presided over the Georgia grand jury that indicted Trump and others in 2023, wrote that "no election superintendent (or member of a board of elections and registration) may refuse to certify or abstain from certifying election results under any circumstance."

The case was supported by the Trump-aligned America First Policy Institute. During an Oct. 1 bench trial, Adams' attorneys argued that election officials should be allowed to certify results that don't include batches of ballots they're investigating for fraud.

McBurney said in his ruling that while local superintendents have an obligation to "investigate concerns about miscounts," they are not empowered to investigate or determine fraud. Instead, any concerns they have should be forwarded to law enforcement, he wrote.

"The Georgia Bureau of Investigation, the Secretary of State, the many District Attorneys, and the Attorney General are all better equipped and clearly authorized to undertake the work of verifying election fraud and seeking consequences for it. Superintendents are not," McBurney wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 3rdworld; bananarepublic; robertmcburney
Click The Pic
Hey! FReepers!
Help Fill The Tank!
How About It? Huh?
It Ain't Askin' Too Much
Ya Know....

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2024 10:32:41 AM PDT by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coronal

Ridiculous. How can you certify a fraudulent election?

There must be a law against cheating. If not, why not cheat in every election. It cannot be stopped is what this judge just said.


2 posted on 10/15/2024 10:35:09 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yes, this judge is on the take is some way. An accomplice, nothing more.


3 posted on 10/15/2024 10:36:25 AM PDT by Sarcazmo (I live by the Golden Rule. As applied by others; I'm not selfish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

The law is the law.


4 posted on 10/15/2024 10:37:38 AM PDT by GrootheWanderer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

So if they can’t delay certification, can they refuse to certify? if not, isn’t certification just an empty, meaningless gesture? The “results” are in, you have to certify (even if there are more votes than registered voters?)


5 posted on 10/15/2024 10:39:19 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

If election officials have no discretion then they are merely tabulators.


6 posted on 10/15/2024 10:39:44 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

The Royal US Judiciary Government Branch has ruled ... all fall down and worship


7 posted on 10/15/2024 10:41:25 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

They can choose to not certify the results, hen fraud is suspected, right?

There seems to be no other choice.


8 posted on 10/15/2024 10:42:38 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
There must be a law against cheating.

There are. But nobody ever has "standing" to enforce them.

9 posted on 10/15/2024 10:42:57 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

No law can force someone to sign something they disagree with - it institutionalizes fraud and perjury.


10 posted on 10/15/2024 10:45:29 AM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

So suddenly we want delays of weeks, or months, and no declared winner? After all the complaining about officials not being able to tally the vote in a timely manner?

Sorry, the law gives officials a week after election day to announce and certify results. If this were Dems trying to delay results and potentially miss the deadline for submitting Electoral ballots Freepers would be grabbing the torches and pitchforks.


11 posted on 10/15/2024 10:48:07 AM PDT by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

>>”no election superintendent (or member of a board of elections and registration) may refuse to certify or abstain from certifying election results under any circumstance.”

Then “certification” is meaningless.


12 posted on 10/15/2024 10:48:08 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
why not cheat in every election. It cannot be stopped is what this judge just said.

This has been the Democrats basic strategy for quite some time now.

13 posted on 10/15/2024 10:48:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (My decisions about people are based almost entirely on skin color. I learned this from Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coronal
How can a person certify something that they can't attest or confirm?

“War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”

Invalidation is certification.

14 posted on 10/15/2024 10:48:30 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

They are going to ram the fraud through. We are not going to accept it. It will go to the Supreme Court if it has to. Hope team Trump has a protocol in place.


15 posted on 10/15/2024 10:48:46 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal
Georgia judge rules election officials can't delay certification because of fraud concerns

If it is fraudulent, it isn't an actual *ELECTION*.

More idiocy from our idiot court judges.

16 posted on 10/15/2024 10:48:56 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

I think this judge will be overruled. Under penalty of perjury, they have to certify that the election results are accurate. The superintendants can say I can’t perjure myself so I won’t certify this election.


17 posted on 10/15/2024 10:49:23 AM PDT by convoter2016 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Certified as fraudulent.


18 posted on 10/15/2024 10:49:36 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Coronal
Ridiculous. How can you certify a fraudulent election?

My thoughts exactly. It seems to be an unconstitutional ruling. Why certify if certification means nothing. Congress should not accept the Georgia electors under these conditions.

19 posted on 10/15/2024 10:51:07 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Ridiculous. How can you certify a fraudulent election?

You don't. You use your authority to declare the election uncertifiable and throw it out.

Then it goes to the state legislature to select Electors to the Electoral College via their plenary power.

-PJ

20 posted on 10/15/2024 10:52:16 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson