Posted on 10/02/2024 9:29:46 AM PDT by TBP
Conservatism, the late philosopher Roger Scruton wrote, emerged into the modern world as “a kind of ‘yes but…’” response to liberalism. Conservatives, he observed, believe, like liberals, in the importance of the free market, of private property and of individual choice. They believe also in the overriding significance of community and tradition as setting limits to the reach of individualism. Liberalism, for Scruton, made sense “only in the social context that conservatism defends”.
The relationship between these two philosophical wellsprings of conservatism has never been comfortable. The tension between the individualism of the market and private property and the communality of custom and tradition, between promethean capitalist development and the fetters of history and culture, has always gnawed away at the heart of conservatism.
It is a tension that can be seen in a surprising ambivalence towards Margaret Thatcher. Certainly, she is an unalloyed Tory heroine, the Iron Lady who transformed both Britain and the Conservative party. Yet, many conservatives also regret the destruction Thatcherism wrought on Britain’s social fabric and its customs and traditions. Scruton himself admired Thatcher but in his memoirs, Gentle Regrets, described his 1980 book The Meaning of Conservatism as “a somewhat Hegelian defence of Tory values in the face of their betrayal by the free marketeers”.
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
“Liberal Conservatism” = Luke Warm.....”I vomit thee out”...
This is a UK paper and they are using liberal in the European sense with a meaning closer to libertarian than to socialist.
“...Conservatives, he observed, believe, like liberals, in the importance of the free market, of private property and of individual choice....”
Maybe in the past, but modern liberalism is close to communism and does NOT believe in free market, private property and individual choice. They believe in oppressive government control of all life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
No. One. Cares.
Can Quisling survive the remaking of the Nazi party are Nuremberg?
Liberal Conservative? What in the actual _______ is that?
That’s a very good graphic way to show how the average Lib has changed over the last two decades.
Some Dems continue to believe they belong to the same Democrat Party they joined back in 1970.
They continue to ‘sleep’ and cannot be awakened to the changes!
I have several family members like that.
Blissfully Ignorant that they now belong to what is essentially a Socialist Party, which among other things, advocates Open Borders, DEI, Trans (Chop-Shop) Surgery, even for for 5 year old children.
The emotionally weak and insecure always find it difficult to face the reality of significant negative change, so they just ignore or delude themselves.
Conservative needs no modifier. Now, if they want to do some conservative liberalism, we can talk.
Yes, he doesn't mean "liberal" in the American sense. I don't think he's quite clear about the other uses of the word: free markets, free trade, individual liberty, modern secularism. Free societies are, or were, quite diverse. We believed that we were free decades ago when we had a very different society. I don't see a threat to free society in Trump or a British equivalent to Trump.
“Liberal Conservatism”
I believe he is using a European definition of “liberal”.
“Liberal” used to mean a believer in individual rights, free markets, a representative republic, etc.
Leftists (now “progressives”) are authoritarian Marxists who reject all of that, but used to call themselves “liberals” and destroyed the meaning of the word.
I hadn't heard that liberals had changed their positions.
He’s using liberal in the classical European sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.