And then these flamboyant, effeminate mannerisms of his, what is that all about?
Posted on 09/30/2024 1:55:28 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Gov. Tim Walz (D), Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate, once bragged about mass immigration overwhelming a small town in southern Minnesota — calling the situation an example of “beautiful diversity.”
In late 2019, Breitbart News reported extensively on Worthington, Minnesota. With fewer than 14,000 residents, the town’s taxpayers were forced to hike taxes to the sum of tens of millions to expand the school district because of a rapid increase in migrant children enrolling.
Much of that mass immigration in Worthington is the result of the federal government’s Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) program and the fact that a JBS Pork slaughterhouse attracts newly arrived migrants to the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Let’s see them beautifully diversify Martha’s Vineyard without the Massachusetts National Guard relocating them to a military base this time.
For those who do not know, local public school districts are required by law to accept any school-age pupil who lives in the district. So if 1000 new kids enroll, places and teachers have to be found for them. This, of course, requires that taxes be raised. If the new kids have special needs, like no English, the district has to provide for that as well. This all comes at the expense of the taxpayers and their children.
This man appears in every respect to be a traitor to America.
But then again, most Democrats are. How did we get to this point?!
Never mind... rhetorical question.
And then these flamboyant, effeminate mannerisms of his, what is that all about?
The expectation of small towns to support these illegal residents is absurd. How about instead, they take all of them to the closest federal property — post office, perhaps? — and say, you want ‘em, you feed ‘em.
Not good for those already there and also not good for the immigrants either. Not being able to communicate with each other causes all kinds of problems - from things as like lack of economic opportunity and mobility to just not having friends and acquaintances you can socialize with.
“forced to hike taxes to the sum of tens of millions to expand the school district”
It all goes back to one Supreme Court decision. Plyler v. Doe.
A 5-4 decision told the citizens of America that they had no right to decide how to spend their taxes, that the citizens of other countries could simply walk in and demand to be given that money.
Repeal that and it all ends.
bttt
That’s from the training he got in china’s communists. “Be subversive in everything you do, comrade.”
So, what, are we going to have the spectacle of an entire TOWN arrested and tossed in jail because they refuse to support this illegal action by the feds? Will they all have wages garnished to enforce this immoral and repugnant dictum?
Where are the sheriffs and do they have a role here? I always thought they were the ones who (theoretically) could declare a law/act unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it (as in gun control).
We are so screwed as a country if these two clowns get in.
Pork roasts. Pork plants. “Beautiful diversity”. Something is going on in the upper worlds, and it doesn’t bode well.
Commies don’t worry about the lumps of clay dealing with their messes. It’s always just “forward comrades!” with not a second thought.
“A 5-4 decision told the citizens of America that they had no right to decide how to spend their taxes, that the citizens of other countries could simply walk in and demand to be given that money.”
The enumerated powers of the Constitution does not give the Judiciary any power to levy taxes nor does the Constitution give the Judiciary the power to dictate how tax money will be spent. The 10th Amendment specifically states all powers not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved to the states and the people. Any power the courts claim to levy taxes or dictate how they will be spent is an assumed power taken from the people and the states. Only Congress and state legislative bodies have the power to tax and appropriate funds.
It is long past time for governors of states to refuse to obey the plainly unconstitutional unilateral commands of tyrannical judges, justices, DOJ attorneys and regulator bureaucrats.
BTT
MN law? Walz regime law?
AMEN
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.