Posted on 09/28/2024 5:56:04 AM PDT by central_va
Interest in electric cars has slumped to its lowest level for four years as an increasing number of drivers say they will stick with petrol-powered vehicles.
Figures from the Department for Transport show that just 13pc of all drivers plan to buy a fully electric car as their next vehicle.
By contrast, interest in combustion-engine cars has risen, with 37pc of motorists saying they will buy a petrol-powered vehicle, up from 31pc a year earlier.
The figures represent a new setback to Labour’s plans to ban the sale of petrol and diesel cars by the end of the decade.
The 13pc of people planning to buy an electric vehicle is the lowest since the summer of 2020, when the vehicles were much less widely available. It is down from 16pc this time last year and a peak of 19pc in the summer of 2022. Interest in hybrids has also dipped.
The latest figures show that around 30pc are now seeking to buy them as their next car, down from 35pc in 2022.
Among potential hybrid buyers, motorists are increasingly opting for older non-plug-in variations that largely rely on internal combustion engines.
The DfT’s Future of Transport programme regularly surveys the public on their attitude towards technologies such as electric cars, driverless cars and e-scooters.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
You left out one thing . . . a lot of those “extreme” profits are a result of Musk’s expertise at grabbing government grift, i.e. the sale of carbon credits. Whether Tesla products are “the best cars in existence” is a matter of personal opinion.
The government made carbon credits. If Musk hadn’t gotten them someone else would have. Don’t curse him for taking them, curse the government for making them. Most people won’t turn down free money. How many people said no to free Covid bucks?
Hmmmm, that means they’re sort of like those cornfield clicking aliens in the movie “Signs”, who are fatally allergic to water yet decide to invade a humid planet 70% covered in ocean. Both plots make about an equal amount of sense.
That statistic is out there. I believe it was 80% also have an internal combustion vehicle. That leaves 20% or so that only have a battery electric vehicle.
Aka not many
They also know that EVs knows where they are and their owners can look on their phones and know where the car is.
Tesla’s can go that far. That’s not to say all or most will. There are model 3s in the mid to high 200s already with good battery health.
Auto auction rebuilds seems to like buying them.
Learned the hard way on a model 85 when the rear drive motor failed and cost him 7k. But the battery was still good.
Oh, I agree and I’m certainly not cursing Musk. I was just attempting to point out that his “extreme profits” aren’t all coming from his “amazing” cars.
I favor: Knowing where places and things are, without requiring a computer.
I find: People with mobile computers, are losing (not gaining) the practice of location orientation - navigation that we learned as part of the necessities.
Ah, but what about mandates? I fully expect that Harris will pass a national mandate like Canada has done. All electric by 2035.
if she isn’t cheated in to presidency, then the next liberal who is will likely mandate it
Agree
EVs are the computer boat anchors of the 90s
All car manufacturers want that level of obsolescence
Musk once again promised the full self-driving “robotaxi” was coming soon, most recently by August 8, 2024. Now he says October. An “October surprise”?
The August reveal didn’t happen, just like every other one of his self-driving promises as far back as 2016.
The robotaxi doesn’t run on electricity, it relies on snake oil for power.
That's the same excuse Soros used to justify his participation in the Holocaust.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.