Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kamala Harris Fails to Keep Pace with Joe Biden’s 2020 Pennsylvania Mail-in-Ballot Requests
Breitbart ^ | 09.24.2024 | Wendell Husebø

Posted on 09/24/2024 8:51:31 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

Vice President Kamala Harris is short about 360,000 Democrat mail-in-ballot requests in Pennsylvania compared to where President Joe Biden was during this time in 2020, according to Secretary of State data.

Harris’s shortfall of Biden’s 2020 mail-in-ballot requests pace is a positive sign for former President Donald Trump’s overall election chances. The mail-in-ballot requests indicate which party is more energized and more likely to vote in the Keystone State.

Biden only won Pennsylvania by about 80,000 votes with about a one million mail-in-ballot request advantage over Republicans.

“Kamala is not even close to keeping pace with Biden mail-in requests,” Republican strategist Cliff Maloney posted on X. “She is down 360,101 Dem mail-in requests compared to this time in 2020.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2020; biden; harris; loserkamala; pace; progressivekamala
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Not a good sign for cackle kneepads
1 posted on 09/24/2024 8:51:31 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
a one million mail-in-ballot request advantage over Republicans.

I may have to request an absentee ballot this year, want to minimize the midnight jump.

2 posted on 09/24/2024 8:53:33 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Oh, there are boxes and boxes of ballots marked for Harris that will appear election night. Don’t doubt it.


3 posted on 09/24/2024 8:56:44 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I’ve never understood why the Democrats settled on Harris? Any candidate they nominated would be bad for the nation to be sure, but others like Gretchen Whitmer, Josh Shapiro and Gavin Newsom would have been much better candidates than Kamala Harris. They would be out there on the campaign trail much more than the VP is, and all of them would have given Trump a challenge in a debate.


4 posted on 09/24/2024 9:10:04 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

And hopefully this costs her the White House.


5 posted on 09/24/2024 9:11:05 AM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

“ I’ve never understood why the Democrats settled on Harris?”

They would have their “people of color” (particularly of the female and tranny variety) and the far, far left - two major portions of their base. And there’d have been an internal war over dissing the “elected” VP that would have also fracture party. It’s a bit like why they chose a guy with obvious dementia four years ago - it’s hard to keep their various factions on the reservation.


6 posted on 09/24/2024 9:16:07 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (Peak crazy is almost here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

“Oh, there are boxes and boxes of ballots marked for Harris that will appear election night. Don’t doubt it.”

I wish you people would stop. You are not helping. You are hurting. There are people out there who will not bother voting because of comments like yours. I wonder if some of these comments are by ChiCom or Dem bots to try and demoralize us. Quit whining and do something:
https://earlyvoteaction.com/
https://truethevote.org/donate
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/?utm_soure=website
https://www.gop.com/


7 posted on 09/24/2024 9:18:00 AM PDT by willk (Local news media. Just as big an enemy to this country as national media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

And after the election quite a few people will find out they requested a ballot the that the turnout exceeds 90% yet again.


8 posted on 09/24/2024 9:24:50 AM PDT by jps098
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

No problem, she will make that up, on the early morning of November 6th.


9 posted on 09/24/2024 9:25:36 AM PDT by spincaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

How do things look compared to 2016?

Are these numbers in proportion to the “pandemic” inflated votes that caused more mail ins?


10 posted on 09/24/2024 9:26:14 AM PDT by dm4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

It would have been best if they hadn’t cancelled the primaries and allowed other candidates like RFK Jr be competitive against Biden but that needed to be decided over a year ago. By the time he got out it was unfortunately way too late for anyone else to hit the ground running. They wouldn’t have had crucial advantages like name recognition and inheriting the Biden/Harris campaign funds. To rerun the primary election is the responsibilities of the states and takes months to prepare for.


11 posted on 09/24/2024 9:27:41 AM PDT by erlayman (E )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dm4

“Are these numbers in proportion to the “pandemic” inflated votes that caused more mail ins?”

That is my question too.


12 posted on 09/24/2024 9:28:04 AM PDT by willk (Local news media. Just as big an enemy to this country as national media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Check this guy out, he says Harris is toast.

https://www.youtube.com/@GoldCrownPolitics#:~:text=My%20content%20looks%20at%20hard%20data

He uses a different way to analyze voting patterns.


13 posted on 09/24/2024 9:36:26 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (.You will suffer from one: The pain of discipline or the pain of regret. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

I read that it was the cost Biden extracted for his stepping down, that Harris was forced upon him in 2020, and insisting that she, as his veep, be the candidate in 2024, both mitigates his shame by continuing his “legacy”, and sticks it to the party.


14 posted on 09/24/2024 10:48:13 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Democrats have devised an undetectable plan to steal 2024
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 9/24/2024 | Patty McMurray
FR Posted on 9/24/2024, 10:07:21 AM by bitt

Democrats have devised a “brilliant plan” to steal our election in 2024—and it’s really quite simple.

They believe the key to winning is getting “9 million individuals to vote for Kamala Harris” from a (cough) pool of 2.4 million eligible overseas voters———latter number of eligible overseas voters are verified according to US government data.

Democrats essentially remove the shock value when it’s announced they only achieved “a percentage” of their goal and reveal they received “millions of new overseas votes.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...

cont


15 posted on 09/24/2024 11:44:05 AM PDT by Liz (Faith is believing what you cannot see; its reward is to see what you believe. St Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Reports from different sources on PA mail-in requests are pretty consistent, with positive news for Repubs.

An article about a week ago noted that 2022 was an off year election. Requests for mail-in from both Dems and Repubs will naturally be up in 2024. However, at the time of the article, Dem requests were up +18% over 2022, Repub requests were up +85%. Appears to be much more interest from Repubs.


16 posted on 09/24/2024 11:44:22 AM PDT by Roadrunner383
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
This reveals the significance of the overseas votes to Democrats.
In 2020, Ga received 18,475 UOCAVA ballots, a state where Trump allegedly lost by 11,779 votes.

Poll workers in other states reported similarly remarkable irregularities:

In Fulton County, GA, a hand recount of 950 UOCAVA ballots had zero votes for Trump—a curious 100% tally for Joe Biden.

A poll worker in a Louisiana County reported that 80% of the UOCAVA ballots were for Biden.

In Cobb County, GA, a poll observer challenged the authenticity of the UOCAVA ballots when she realized that 80 to 90% were votes for Biden.

A judge of elections in Colorado observed the tabulation of UOCAVA ballots and was alarmed that nearly 95% of the ballots were votes for Biden.

In the City of Richmond, VA, a poll worker reported that a hand-tally of approximately one thousand ballots showed 85-90% Biden.

These are just four examples of shocking asymmetries in party preference. Verity Vote submitted multiple FOIA requests to counties across the country requesting records of the UO—CAVA ballot tabulation.

Most counties do not keep records of the results for this category of ballots. The accommodations necessary to ensure that uniformed service members are fully able to participate in elections should not be the same as the accommodations offered to every non-military requester.

17 posted on 09/24/2024 11:49:04 AM PDT by Liz (Faith is believing what you cannot see; its reward is to see what you believe. St Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

Note well: Congress allocated $90 million tax dollars to the US Postal Service to compensate them for services rendered to voters living abroad.

Citizens living overseas, including members of the armed forces, are allowed by law to vote absentee in elections. In Montana, a functioning absentee system allows them to vote starting 45 days until Election Day.
Democrat voter fraud is in high gear.......globally.
Backstory: Pres Reagan signed into law the 1986 Uniformed
and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA):
<><>to protect a time-honored tradition of overseas voting
<><>to enhance US citizens abroad and U.S. military members’ right to vote
<><>yet, federal law doesn’t provide clear, commonsense rules
<><>for how overseas voters register to vote
<><>or how their votes are compiled and counted.
<><>ergo, states can make their own laws — even bad ones.

But this past August, we learned that Democrats have gone global, committing $300,000 to register and influence 9 million overseas voters — even though the federal government says only 2.4 million legal voters live in other countries. That’s 6.4 million votes that Democrats want to find...that don’t exist. The group financing the efforts——Democrats Abroad—— told CBS News that the ballots are “likely to favor Kamala Harris.”

Contact the RNC
310 1st St SE
Washington, DC 20003


18 posted on 09/24/2024 11:51:00 AM PDT by Liz (Faith is believing what you cannot see; its reward is to see what you believe. St Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

All you need is one ballot. You run it through the counter 360,000 times. easy peasy.


19 posted on 09/24/2024 12:28:50 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The ballot truck from Long Island hasn’t arrived yet.


20 posted on 09/24/2024 12:54:22 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson