Kamala Harris First Solo Interview with Local Pennsylvania Reporter Turns into Disaster

Breitbart ^ | 09/13/2024 | Wendell Husebo

[bunkerhill7]

Lawn darts, Anyone?

[vpintheak]

I agree. People need to see her talk. And it would be great to not have someone give her the questions ahead of time, and actually ask her difficult questions and press her when she ignores it.

[going hot]

Ye grasshopper of little faith.

[Beowulf]

Why wasn't Kamala provided with the questions before there interview?

OR

Maybe she was ... but with insufficient time to memorize lines and mugging choreography?

[Vendome]

She must’ve come with a Rosetta Stone at one time...

[1066AD]

Some say if internal polls don’t improve she will somehow get swapped out as nominee. In favour of ? ? ? ? ?

[scott says]

Some say if internal polls don’t improve she will somehow get swapped out as nominee. In favour of ? ? ? ? ?

https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-to-replace-kamala-on-ballot-with-abc-moderators

[scott says]

https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-to-replace-kamala-on-ballot-with-abc-moderators

[Gaffer]

She’s more full of sh!t than a Christmas Turkey.

[Political Junkie Too]

Trump is foolish not to have another debate. The more she talks, the greater chance of a screw up.

I disagree. I just posted this earlier before reading your post. You are correct that the more she talks, the greater the chance of a screw-up. It's just that Trump doesn't need to give her the debate stage in order to do that.

---

Harris didn't deliver on policy specifics that the independent voters were craving. I gave more credit to the lack of a Harris primary as the reason, instead of using the debate as a performance to attack President Trump at the cost of not revealing her own positions.

Still, the fact is that Harris needs more opportunities to show the voters what she "really" believes -- to get her "message" out. They want the forum of another debate to do that and are trying to publicly shame President Trump into giving them one.

They're saying that Trump won't debate because Harris won, while at the same time they're not acknowledging polls showing that "winner" Harris needs another opportunity to reach the voters because she left them wanting after the first debate.

What I'm saying is that President Trump doesn't have to oblige them of their need. They will have to create their own public shows of Harris:

• Trump is holding rallies that several media outlets are carrying (Fox News, Right Side Broadcasting Network, YouTube) where the interested can tune in and see Trump's "performance". Harris can do the same.

• Trump is holding press conferences nearly every other day where he is taking impromptu questions from reporters. Harris can do the same.

• Trump is appearing on multiple TV shows giving extended interviews with journalists. Harris can do the same.

• Trump is appearing before panels of special interest groups (convention of black journalists, New York economic policy boards, union members, black churches, etc.). Harris can do the same.

What President Trump is NOT obligated to do is give Harris another bite at the staged debate apple that he's now done twice to her once, through no fault of his.

---

President Trump already had two debates with the Democrat candidate; it's not his fault that the Democrats replaced their candidate after the first debate and now want Trump to pretend that never happened. It was the Democrats who ignored their own voters and didn't give them the candidate they voted for. It was the Democrats who cleared the field and didn't let anyone else run in the primary to become "battle tested" before facing President Trump.

It's not on President Trump to give the replacement Democrat another debate to give their candidate the visibility that a primary would have given. It's up to the Democrats to find a way on their own to make their candidate visible, like more press conferences, interviews, and rally appearances.

-PJ

[Tellurian]

She is trying to be a candidate “about nothing”.

Her Marxist self would turn everyone off, and her job record is ultimately worthless for an executive position, so all she can do is hide her true nature, hide her record, lie about her opponent, promise Joy, and end up being about nothing.

It worked for Seinfeld. Her puppeteers think it will work for Harris. But it’s not.

[Political Junkie Too]

“My approach is about new ideas, new policies that are directed at the current moment... my focus is very much in what we need to do over the next ten twenty years to catch up to the twenty first century,” Harris said.

So which is it? Is Harris "focused" on the "current moment" or on "the next twenty years?"

"[T]hinking about developing and creating an opportunity economy where it’s about investing in areas that really need a lot of work, and maybe focusing on again, the aspirations and the dreams, but also just recognizing that at this moment in time, some of the stuff we could take for granted years ago, we can’t take for granted anymore."

"I, based on experience and a lived experience, know in my heart, I know in my soul, I know that the vast majority of us as Americans have so much more in common... And I also believe that I am accurate in knowing that most Americans want a leader who brings us together as Americans..."

-PJ

[GOPJ]

The more she talks, the greater chance of a screw up.

Maybe if she's willing to debate on FOX News with Gutfeld and Watters as the mods - and the Babylon Bee writing half the questions...( kind of a parody of ABC's 'Cheatin' Refs Throwing the Game' routine...) Yeah, that would work.

[Mat_Helm]

Kamalama Ding Dong !

[GOPJ]

lived in Alameda County—Oakland, Berkeley, East Bay California in the Early 90’s and watched this ditz’s “career” unfold in real time. Herb Caen was a columnist for the SF Chronicle and reported on Willie Browns “squeeze” often.........she ain’t nothin’ but street trash....nothing has changed.

I wonder if the reason successful women in the MSM don't object to her getting 'a leg up' in her career unfairly is because many of them also 'slept with the boss' to cheat their way to the top. Could that be it?

[markman46]

she is just so stupid, to get the EITC you need to file taxes the yr after the child is born, so you need a crib or a new car. tuff bounce you got to wait, also need to get your kid a SSnumber

[scott says]

Women have a strange ‘bond”—will support a woman just because its a woman—no logic or reason or thought involved. Clarification—liberal women-—do this—not Conservative women.
As if it will make things better—
NEVER FORGET-—Adam was cast from Paradise,the Garden of Eden BECAUSE he listened to Eve and was deceived-—
lesson—IF you want to lose Peace and Heaven follow a woman-—
( I jest, somewhat 😜)

[Bullish]

So wait a moment... You mean she believes what can be, unburdened by what has been?

[avital2]

the strategy could be to force her to do interviews like this one, to get exposure. based on how this turned out, it could be a good one. she spoke in a disjointed jumble of memorized talking points and word salads that were not even close to answering questions posed.