| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 09/19/2024 5:26:28 AM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
Childishness |
Posted on 09/09/2024 6:28:41 AM PDT by Cronos
Russian government long term planning set in motion a long term military buildup to deal with Ukraine and if necessary NATO. In 2022 and 2023 Russia tweeked its MOD output. The original build up called for four combined army corps of approx 500k men. At the same time they have increased naval vessel production.
“””At the same time they have increased naval vessel production.”””
Surely they didn’t anticipate these massive naval losses they have suffered during this land invasion? What was the purpose of their increasing naval production back then?
You’re smart. Research it for yourself and you tell me. I just read what they did. Hint - try the Russian Duma or MOD homepage.
Here is a video to listen to at 2x speed on youtube. He is going into the pressures on Russia from their diplomatic and trade partners which demonstrates to great degree as to why Russia did not use it full force to defeat Ukriane.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxidE8ADpFA
I usually read ahead while on 2x speed, and bump ahead to get thru his long sessions.
You never support your claims, you just post them endlessly.
Yeah, I went to 2x for Alexander for a while, but now I dropped back to 1.75x [to catch the names of the towns that Syrsky and the Azov guys are coughing up to the Russian liberators].
Alexander is dropping this one REAL early today!
I wouldn't have checked till around 3 or 4pm.
"Putin Hosting Modi Rep; BRICS NSAs Moscow Meeting; Rus Cuts Selidovo, Vuhledar Lines; Breaks Toretsk" [September 9, 2024]
"Brokeback Rada: Why cain't he quit Doink?"
Is your Internet broke?
Good comeback to that Russian liar.
They never, ever criticize Putin, the guy who actually started this war, do they? (lol)
Welcome aboard, we need more good guys here!
Only someone delusional would deny that.
It's been obvious for months that continuing this war will only result in Ukraine losing more lives and territory. The loss of territory is accelerating.
Anyone believing this propaganda is a moron.
Disagree? Put up or shut up and let's make a wager -- $100 to a future Freep-a-thon.
Sorry my FRiend. I stopped all communication with you. While I can agree with your posts in some forums which we overlap, I will continue to avoid direct responses to your failure to answer your own questions which are endless. Maybe I overestimated your abilities?
ransomnote: Jumper and the analysts I’ve watched throughout the conflict are correct - early on, the Ukraine obviously stood no chance of winning. Therefore, analysts and those of us who read them, believed that Zelensky would preserve the lives and resources of his country and negotiate.
Some of us didn’t realize that NATO (United STates) would refuse to allow the Ukraine to negotiate a peace deal. The country and her citizens mean nothing to NATO, they are simply a tool to be used up, drained dry of blood and resources, and the empty husk thrown away.
So there would be attacks that would normally be decisive in driving the Ukraine to the negotiating table. The analysts would say, ‘it’s over’, the Ukraine would want to negotiate, the United States would refuse to let them negotiate and would instead, shove them back into the ring, and the Ukraine would begin conscripting old disabled men on down to young teenaged boys and keep fighting.
So the Ukraine lost early on and is forced to fight. The Kursk operation was a critical disaster for the Ukraine - it’s why their lines in Donbas are falling. But Zelensky will say and do what his handlers tell him to say or do.
The 3rd June 2022 link you quote “Ukraine, stick a fork in them and turn them over” was an accurate reflection of the battlefield realities at the time. Normal leaders would preserve enough citizens to have a country which can rebuild after the war - but NATO may just slice up the Ukraine and hand it out to neighbors. Whatever NATO’s plan, they are not saving the Ukraine for the Ukrainians. The Ukraine is to them just a launch pad full of useful people to expend in NATO’s proxy war. They are fighting through the Ukraine until the soldiers all die and or run out of bullets.
You quote:
“1st September JUST BEFORE KHERSON was liberated from Muscowite hands — “Farther down in the article it states Russian forces in Kherson number about 20,000 military, and that it could take “months” to dislodge them.
....I doubt the Ukraine will have swift gains on a large scale”
Well that was true as no one realized the Russians would withdraw their troops and the Ukrainians would then claim that they drove the troops out of Kherson. The Ukraine has a habit of doing that - claiming ‘mighty victory’ over abandoned buildings and towns. They are doing it now, in Kursk. The Russians evacuated citizens in Kursk and the Ukrainians moved into empty villages and claimed to have ‘taken Russian land” and ‘set up an administrative office’.
You quote: “10thNovember 2022 “ I predict every East of Di’niper River will be ceded to Russia “
That still looks likely to be true. Prescient.
You quote: “10th October 2022 The Ukraine will not tie into the EUs electrical grid until 2023. Rolling Blackouts in the Ukraine have canceled today, the Blackouts will now be mostly permanent.”
That is true - most of the grid is gone in the Ukraine, along with most electronics plugged into it -medical equipment on down to cell phones.
There are many statements you profile which are true, but delayed beyond all reason as it only destroys the Ukraine and her people. The following is painfully true after Zelensky’s tactic of sending the Ukraine’s best regiments into Kursk.
“13th December 2022 Russia is advancing on all fronts as I type this... This is the final stage of battles which will dictate Russian demands for peace. The Ukraine is going to see the destruction of most of her army.”
NATO is fighting down to its last Ukrainians - this has slowed things down as most believed the battle was to preserve Ukraine. Quite the opposite is true.
I believe NATO supported the Kursk operation in order to end the Ukraine’s chances of ever negotiating with Putin. Very recently, Johnson arrived in Ukraine and all talk of negotiations once again were scrapped.
So Jumper and others have been right - if this had been a war FOR Ukraine instead of a proxy war fronted by Ukraine. The history of quotes you provide is proof that this is not about freeing the Ukraine, ‘saving the homeland’ etc.
This war is NATO pushing for world dominion, and Russia is in its way. NATO will use up every drop of Ukrainian blood, and then once failure is too obvious to hide, will allow negotiations.
As your links indicate, “Odessa will fall. Ukraine will no longer have any port access once this ends and is carved up”, this is likely true, and will likely take more time.
Thanks!
“Here is more to hold. Odessa will fall by Dec 25, without negotiations.”
“Kiev will unconditionally surrender by Dec 26 if they do not negotiate surrender first.”
Given your track record as shown by Cronos, dont you think you should just dial back the predictions a wee bit?
Its ok to admit simply that you were wrong on your predictions. My Daddy always said it took a bigger man to admit when one is wrong. i sure have been at times.
Every inch of Kursk that Ukraine now controls will absolutely remain part of Ukraine.
Suck it up princess.
You just can’t explain your bizarre and ridiculous predictions that you constantly make.
You don’t like responding to people who ask you about them, you just want to make long, detailed, and fanciful posts that you dream up, and then follow those with different, long, detailed, fanciful predictions that you dream up to replace the debunked ones, and as we see, you do that for years on this Russian invasion, the seasons change, the years change, and your predictions change as the facts overrun them, but you don’t want to respond to people about them.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Ukraine started this year {2024} on the brink of disaster. A lot has changed since., canuck_conservative wrote: Every inch of Kursk that Ukraine now controls will absolutely remain part of Ukraine.
Suck it up princess.
That's obviously a ridiculous assertion. Russians have hundreds of thousands of reserve troops if they want to use them. Putin has pointed to the fact that French, American and Polish mercenaries in the Ukraine troops have been shooting at civilians, ambulances and firetrucks and trying to attack the nuclear power plant. For these reason, he has deemed the Ukrainian operation in Kursk 'terrorism', and he said the rules of the Geneva convention therefore do not apply. For this reason, it's possible that every foreign troop in Kursk will never leave Russia alive. There's simply no hope of the Ukraine remaining supplied and alive in Kursk - they have lost air defenses and are under attack from Russian aircraft and ground troops. The Russians can resupply at will.
The Kursk offensive was supported by NATO to stop Putin from negotiating - NATO was satisfied to sacrifice the Ukraine's best troops for this operation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.