Posted on 09/04/2024 11:06:07 PM PDT by ganeemead
Conflict will end on Russian terms, and soon
maybe it’s true or maybe it isn’t, but Scott Ritter isn’t a good source because his heavy bias blinds him
DoJ has to arrrst him again…
It’s better for NATO to end. NATO was always a scam to get the US to pay for their defense so they could pay for socialism.
Child rapist has thoughts
“Hey, Blix Boy. Don’t you have a Burger King play with yourselfland that you need to perv off around?
ITA! It should have gone away when the Warsaw Pact did.
I smell a false flag coming
Maybe it’s a real and true flag instead of a false flag, I was reading an article recently about the Biden Administration giving approval to Ukraine for even longer-range missiles, then the ATACMS.
If Ukraine really is on the verge of collapsing, then look for them to try something really off the wall, like invading the Kursk region which appears to be failing, a barrage of long missiles raining down on Moscow might be just the ticket to really stir things up just before the election.
Wow, a Russian propagandist tells Russian propaganda. How quaint.
No, it should have been repurposed for the then emerging threat of global Islam and its oppression.
At one point it was to be used to counter nazis and communists. Now the nazis are Islamic and they have merged with communist/ tribal ideals.
Ouch, Danny and Scott. Two Marxists. Two haters of Israel. Two haters of the US.
Scott always sides with his wife’s nation of birth.
Again?
I thought the Neocons ‘silenced’ Ritter, as they do with every source that tell the truth and develops a following (and even attempt to do here, with some of us).
That pedo weirdo has been saying the same thing for over 920 days now. “Just a few more days until Russia’s total victory!”
Scott Ritter is correct about the war but he’s starting to smear Trump, saying that Trump does not have a realistic plan to end the war.
Does anyone have a realistic plan to end that war? Unfortunately not :(
This does not fit what I have been reading or seeing on YouTube (sometimes a better source of news then the network news).
If Russia had the ability to win the war with Ukraine they could have done it the first month. That was the plan after all. So why didn’t they? Corruption top to bottom. Putin believed his Generals when they told him the men were trained, the equipment was up to date and maintained, that they were ready to go if ever needed and I honestly think they, the Generals, never thought they would be needed.
Of course they were not ready. Money allocated for the military was skimmed off the top at every level and the only thing that got done right were the reports up the chain of command saying they were ready for war.
While Russia does not have a manpower problem, they have a logistic problem.
They don’t seem to be able to replace equipment as fast as it is being destroyed.
But even if they have the means of production they have another problem, how to get the stuff to the front line. Russia relies mostly on rail to transport goods, and trains, tracks and rails are easy targets and difficult to defend. A few men can disrupt miles of track preventing men and supplies moving to the front.
Same with roads.
Ukraine has not so much changed war as we know it, but returned to how a small force can defeat a much larger force, guerilla warfare. Ukraine does not have to take and hold land, but simply keep the enemy from access to key parts (like the gas hub system).
It is also interesting to note that Russia does not yet have air superiority. True they have a air force and they can fly over Ukraine but only at great risk so for the most part they are not doing so.
As always I have no inside knowledge and my conclusions from the data I have may be wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.