I see only one logical response to this:
Regards,
Posted on 08/27/2024 7:52:57 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
This is the headline of an article published Aug. 26 in The New York Times: "Fare Evasion Surges on N.Y.C. Buses, Where 48% of Riders Fail to Pay."
The article begins: "Every weekday in New York City, close to one million bus riders -- roughly one out of every two passengers -- board without paying.
"Fare evasion has led to startling financial losses for the M.T.A. (Metropolitan Transit Authority), the state agency that runs the city transit system. In 2022, the authority lost $315 million because of bus fare evasion and $285 million as a result of subway fare beaters, according to a 2023 report commissioned by the M.T.A."
This report encapsulates the foolishness -- and therefore the destructiveness -- of progressive ideas.
To understand why, let's go back five years.
On April 13, 2019, the Times ran this headline: "1 in 5 Bus Riders in New York City Evades the Fare, Far Worse Than Elsewhere."
In just five years, the percentage of New Yorkers who avoid paying their bus fare -- in other words, steal -- increased from 20% to 50%, a two-and-a-half times increase.
And why might that be? The answer is the same answer that explains virtually every awful development in American cities: moronic progressive ideas and the Democratic Party, the party that governs all our big cities.
As reported in the 2019 article, "Fare evasion was widespread and the reasons varied. Riders did not have exact change. They knew they would not get in trouble ..."
Let's deal with these reasons.
"Riders did not have exact change."
Are we to believe that two and a half times more New Yorkers lacked exact change in 2024 than in 2019? The "no exact change" excuse is typical of people who break laws -- they don't blame themselves; in fact, they regard themselves as perfectly innocent. This is precisely what almost all people who engage in criminal behavior -- from fare evasion to murder -- do: justify their behavior to themselves.
"They knew they would not get in trouble."
That's the real reason. And as we shall see, progressives ensure that fare evaders will not get in trouble.
If people believe they will get away with it, many, maybe even most, people will do bad things.
There are three reasons people desist from doing bad things:
Progressives have done away with this crime prevention tool. In California, for example, progressives decided to make theft of up to $950 a misdemeanor. As a result, there is more theft of retail stores than at any time in modern California history.
The threat of punishment is why there is less fare evasion in London or Paris than in New York. As the 2019 Times article reported, "In London, where riders face fines as high as $1,300, the fare evasion rate on buses is only 1.5 percent." And in Paris, "the fare evasion rate for buses is 11 percent. ... The Paris transit system has 1,200 staff members dedicated to the problem and hands out about one million fines each year."
In December 2018, The Washington Post reported:
"The D.C. Council gave final approval this week to a measure decriminalizing Metro fare evasion. ... Council members and activists (said) decriminalization was an important step toward addressing disproportionate policing of African Americans who use the transit system. ... Proponents of the bill, the Metro Fare Evasion Decriminalization Amendment Act of 2018, pointed to a recent report from the Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs that found between January 2016 and February 2018, 91 percent of Metro Transit Police citations and summons for fare evasion were issued to African Americans."
Thanks to progressives and D.C. Democrats, the amount of fare evasion increased exponentially in the nation's capital. And so, a few months ago, D.C. did what New York City is now doing. As reported earlier this year by NBC News in D.C.:
"Enhanced enforcement against Metro fare evasion began in D.C. on Monday, March 18. The new policies are part of the anti-crime legislation approved by the D.C. Council and signed by Mayor Muriel Bowser earlier this month."
This is true among a minority of people. But for a vast number of people, the conscience is largely useless. The fact that Stalin, Hitler, Mao and the many people who murdered and tortured on their behalf slept well at night should prove how utterly malleable the conscience is. In most people, the conscience is as strong as putty.
People who believe in the Ten Commandments -- and, importantly, that God is their author -- are less likely to steal. This is the case either because they believe they must not steal just because God commands them not to or because they believe God will punish them.
But, of course, progressives have gotten rid of the Ten Commandments. Simply requiring school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments -- as Oklahoma and Kentucky are attempting to do -- has set off a left-wing panic.
In a nutshell, the Times headline encapsulates one other aspect of modern life: The civil war in America and in the West is not just between the Left and the Right. It is between the Left and civilization.
There’s a great scene in The Out of Towners where Jack Lemmon has been robbed of his money and his watch and his dignity by the lowlifes of New York City and says to his wife: Watch me, I can ride this city bus and I have a right and they have to let me.
Next scene is the bus departing and Lemmon standing back on the sidewalk.
WTF do you expect?
Many moons ago in Sacramento, Kalifornia, there was an ‘expose’ on the local news about the same thing. The news station actually confronted a local Sacramento bureaucrat about all the free riders. The bureaucrat stated “it would cost too much for enforce the law.”
There has been a palpable increase in general lawlessness since Covid, I think. It’s like something gave way in the culture. You see it in lots of small ways. Just today, during my evening commute, I was thinking about how people seem to run red lights more now.
Ahhwww, that’s a shame....
Crime don’t pay
If the “sanctuary city” doesn’t charge fares to the illegal aliens, why would any local pay?
the real reason is the law will not charge blacks and let them get away with everything...so why should the rest of us pay? WE SHOULDN'T..
I think there was a palpable shift during Covid. It’s like certain norms fell by the wayside and didn’t return. You see it in lots of small ways. Retail stores being in disarray is the new normal, for instance.
Ask Peter Buttigieg. He should have a solution. He’s the Transportation Secretary.
“so why should the rest of us pay? WE SHOULDN’T..”
That’s right, but the law these days is only enforced against the law-abiding people. They’d throw the book at us.
You see this in all sanctuary cities. Letting millions of monsters illegally live in your city just breeds contempt for the law and so everybody starts breaking the law.
They use their policies as a mask to disguise their intentional attacks on our society.
I see only one logical response to this:
Regards,
New York is going broke because they’re in the black.
It makes sense that if democrats can’t figure out how to get a voter ID, they can’t figure out exact change either. Sounds like lifestyle discrimination to expect them to pay for anything.
Pete becomes the butt of a lot of jokes.
Mostly deserved.
My thought, too. When it does all come tumbling down, NYC is not one of the places one would NOT want to be.
That movie was hilarious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.